Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Smith v. NetApp, Inc.”
Parallel Iron LLC v. NetApp, Inc.public domain
Memorandum Opinion ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE: Currently before the Court is Defendant NetApp, Inc.’s request for attorney’s fees. *355(D.I.94). This matter has been fully briefed. (D.I.94, 103, 104), For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s request is GRANTED IN PART. Defendant’s requests for discovery and an injunction are DENIED.
Parallel Iron LLC v. Netapp Inc.public domain
Memorandum Opinion. ANDREWS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:. Presently before this Court for disposition is Defendant NetApp Inc.’s motion for attorney fees. (D.I.58). This matter has been fully briefed (D.I.59, 64, 72) and the Court heard oral argument on June 25, 2014. (D.I.82). The Court also reviewed the Plaintiffs pre-suit claim charts and other supporting materials submitted by the Plaintiff for
NetApp, Inc. v. Nimble Storage, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge • Plaintiff NetApp, Inc. filed this suit against Defendants Nimble Storage, Inc. (“Nimble”), Michael Reynolds, and former NetApp employees Daniel Weber, Sandhya Klute, Timothy Binning, Neil Glick, and Christopher Alduino (collectively, “employees”). See ECF Nos. 1 (Compl.), 34 (First A
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.public domain
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. This copyright dispute involves 37 packages of computer source code. The parties have often referred to these groups of computer programs, individually or collectively, as “application programming interfaces,” or API packages, but it is their content, not their name, that matters. The predecessor of Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) wrote these and other
Paragon Metals Holdings, LLC v. Michael J. Smithpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PARAGON METALS HOLDINGS § LLC, PARAGON METALS LLC, § STELLEX PARAGON METALS § No. 385, 2025 SPLITTER LP, and STELLEX § CAPITAL INVESTORS, § Court Below—Superior § Court of the State of Plaintiffs Below, Appellants/ § Delaware Cross-Appellees, § § C
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RIVER VALLEY ) INGREDIENTS, LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N19C-12-160 PRW ) CCLD AMERICAN PROTEINS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants/Counte
Robert Bugielski v. At&t Services, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT J. BUGIELSKI; CHAD S. No. 21-56196 SIMECEK, individually as participants in the AT and T D.C. No. Retirement Savings Plan and as a 2:17-cv-08106- representatives of all persons similarly VAP-RAO situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. AT&T SERVICES, INC.; AT&T BENEFIT PLAN INVESTMENT COMMITTEE,
Shaw v. Citimortgage, Inc.public domain
ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is a breach of contract action arising from an alleged residential loan modification agreement between plaintiff Leslie J. Shaw (“Shaw”) and defendant CitiMort-gage, Inc. (“CMI”).. Shaw alleges that in mid-2011, the parties executed a loan modification agreement on his residential home loan, but CMI breached the agreement
Welenco, Inc. v. Corbellpublic domain
ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. Before the court are motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Gary W. Corbell, ECF No. 109, and Boredata, Inc. and Craig G. Corbell, ECF No. 110. Plaintiffs Water Well Technology, Inc. (Water Well) and Welenco, Inc. (Welenco) oppose both motions, and seek sealing of certain documents. ECF Nos.-125, 126, 127. Defendants have replied. ECF Nos.
Sunpower Corp. v. Sunedison, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION The central issue in defendants SunEdison, Inc., Shane Messer, Kendall Fong, and Vikas Desai’s motion to dismiss is whether current employees violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1030, if they breach their employer’s computer use policies while accessi
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, AND THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. __________________________ 2009-1372, -1380, -1
Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.public domain
688 F.Supp.2d 957 (2010) SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., Defendant. No. C-07-05488 EDL. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 24, 2010. *959 Carrie Lynne Williamson, David L. Alberti, Eliza Behold, Mark Fowler, Yakov M. Zolotorev, Christine Kerba Corbett, DLA Piper US LLP, East Pal
Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Network Appliance, Inc.public domain
690 F.Supp.2d 1027 (2010) SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., Defendant. No. C-07-05488 EDL. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 19, 2010. *1029 Carrie Lynne Williamson, David L. Alberti, Eliza Behold, Mark Fowler, Yakov M. Zolotorev, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP, East Palo Alt
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.public domain
OrdeR Granting Motion of Defendant to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE I. Introduction As set forth herein, the Court Grants the motion of defendant Apple Inc. to stay this case in favor of inter partes review proceedings currently underway before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). (Dkt. No. 125.)
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RIVER VALLEY ) INGREDIENTS, LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N19C-12-160 PRW ) CCLD AMERICAN PROTEINS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants/Counte
Bertola v. Fisher-Pricepublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SARAH ANN BERTOLA and ) DALLAS BERTOLA, ) Co-Personal Representatives of the ) C.A. No. N21C-01-115 FJJ Estate of A.M.B., Deceased ) and in their own right ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) FISHER-PRIC
Christie v. National Institute for Newman Studiespublic domain
OPINION Freda L. Wolfson, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) filed by Defendants National Institute for Newman Studies (“NINS”), Catherine Ryan, Drew Morgan, Henry Gailliot, and David Abernathy (collectively “Defendants”), seeking dismissal of the Complaint by Plaintiff Robert C. Christie (“Plaintiff’) for la
Gavin Grimm v. Gloucester County School Boardpublic domain
*289 ORDER Gavin Grimm, a transgender boy,’ commenced this action against the Gloucester County School Board in July 2015, alleging that the School Board’s policy of assigning students to restrooms based on their biological sex violated Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Shortly t
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HARTREE NATURAL GAS ) STORAGE, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N22C-07-073 ) PRW CCLD PAA NATURAL GAS STORAGE, L.P., ) PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, ) L.P., )
Epikhin v. Game Insight North Americapublic domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Evgeny Epikhin (“Epikhin”) and Dmitri Redlikh (“Redlikh”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring suit against defendants Game Insight North America, Cooper Media Corp. d/b/a Game Insight, and Game Insight Global Limited d/b/a GIGL (collectively, “Game Insight”) and Game Garden, LLC (“Game Garden”) (together, with