Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Smith v. Karnes”
Karnes v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNA.public domain
921 A.2d 591 (2007) Roger J. KARNES, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNA. Penna. State Police (D.N.A.), Respondents. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted January 12, 2007. Decided April 19, 2007. Roger J. Karnes, petitioner, pro se. Michael L. Harvey, Sr. Deputy Attorney General and Susan J. Forney, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Harrisburg, for
Karnes v. Boeing Companypublic domain
HENRY, Circuit Judge, concurring: I agree with the dissent that if Mr. Karnes is raising his statutory claim based upon a breach of contract between the Union and Boeing, such a claim would be pre-empted. I read the majority opinion to say that the claims that are not preempted were based on unfair application and wrongful termination claims arising from the Oklahoma Standard for Workplace Drug and Alcohol
Sampson v. Karnespublic domain
PER CURIAM: This is an appeal by Donald Karnes, the Mayor of the City of Nitro, West Virginia, and Hack’s Mobile Homes, Inc., a West Virginia corporation, from an order entered by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County on October 29, 1990. That order enjoined Hack’s Mobile Homes, Inc., from using a parcel of real estate located in the City of Nitro in such a manner as to violate the zoning ordinance of the City of Nitro. The appa
McLenagan v. Karnespublic domain
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge K.K. HALL wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Senior Judge GODBOLD joined. OPINION K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge: In the early morning hours of May 10, 1992, the Richmond Police Department was conducting a sobriety checkpoint at a toll plaza on the Richmond Downtown Expressway. Drivers who failed a field sobriety test were tak
Aimee Karnes v. Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2023 MSPB 12 Docket No. DA-1221-21-0009-W-1 Aimee Karnes, Appellant, v. Department of Justice, Agency.
Boersma v. Karnespublic domain
417 N.W.2d 341 (1988) 227 Neb. 329 Lloyd BOERSMA and Phyllis Boersma, Appellants, v. Donna KARNES, Nebraska Tax Commissioner, and Nebraska Department of Revenue, Appellees. No. 86-196. Supreme Court of Nebraska. January 8, 1988. *343 Michael L. Johnson of Luebs, Dowding, Beltzer, Leininger, Smith & Bus
Miskel v. Karnespublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0037p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Petitioner-Appellant,
Inscore v. Karnes County Savings & Loan Ass'npublic domain
787 S.W.2d 183 (1990) T.R. INSCORE, et al., Appellants, v. KARNES COUNTY SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellees. No. 13-89-269-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. March 22, 1990. Rehearing Overruled April 19, 1990. O.F. Jones, III, Victoria, for appellants. Frank B. Burney, Martin & Drought, San Antonio, John D. Murp
Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. Richmanpublic domain
652 F.3d 360 (2011) Rita L. TRISTANI, by and through her Attorney in Fact, Maria C. KARNES; Joshua C. Valenta, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated; A.H., individually and as parents and natural guardian of A.H., a minor v. Estelle RICHMAN, in both her individual and official capacity; Feather O. Houston, in her individual capacity, Estelle Richman, in both her individual and official capacity; Feather O. Houston, in her i
Carol M. Sieg v. Keith E. Karnespublic domain
LAY, Chief Judge. This case involves an appeal from an order of the district court for the district of South Dakota, the Honorable John B. Jones presiding, quashing service of process and dismissing the case. Carol M. Sieg, a resident of South Dakota, was injured in an automobile accident with Keith E. Karnes,, a resident of Iowa, on December 10,1978, in
Johnson v. Karnespublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0097p.06 UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ JAMES M. JOHNSON II; CHRISTIE R. JOHNSON; JAMES M. X
Leisure v. Karnespublic domain
ORDER Linda Leisure, an Ohio resident proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing her civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a). On August 8, 2000, Leisure filed a complai
Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. Richmanpublic domain
609 F.Supp.2d 423 (2009) Rita L. TRISTANI, by and through her Attorney in Fact, Maria C. Karnes, and Joshua C. Valenta, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Estelle B. RICHMAN, in both her individual and official capacities, and Feather Houstoun, in her individual capacity, Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-694. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.<
United States v. Robert Lee Karnespublic domain
WINTER, Circuit Judge: After the jury was unable to agree upon a verdict and was discharged at his first trial, Robert Lee Karnes was tried a second time and convicted by a jury of concealing a motor vehicle moving as, or which is part of, or which constitutes interstate or foreign commerce, knowing the vehicle to have been stolen, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2313 (1970). Karnes has appealed, asserting as
People v. Smithpublic domain
Appeal by the People from so much of an amended order of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), entered March 19, 2001, as granted those branches of the defendants’ respective omnibus motions which were to dismiss count one of the indictment charging them with arson in the third degree. *598Ordered that the amended order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, those
Mary Ann Karnes v. William Drake Karnespublic domain
Karnes v. Karnes IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN NO. 3-93-149-CV MARY ANN KARNES, APPELLANT
Karnes v. Statepublic domain
873 S.W.2d 92 (1994) Noah Charles KARNES, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Nos. 05-93-00102-CR05-93-00104-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. February 23, 1994. *94 Garland D. Cardwell, Sherman, for appellant. Thomas H. Fowler, Sherman, for appellee. Before BAKER, BURNETT and ROSENBERG, JJ. <
Karnes v. Quality Pork Processorspublic domain
532 N.W.2d 560 (1995) Bonnie KARNES, Appellant, v. QUALITY PORK PROCESSORS, Respondent, v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. CX-93-2113. Supreme Court of Minnesota. June 9, 1995. *561 Warren F. Plunkett, Peter D. Plunkett, Warren F. Plunkett & Associates, Austin, for appellant. Donal
Leavell v. Karnespublic domain
143 B.R. 212 (1990) Daniel R. LEAVELL, et al., Appellants, v. Gibson KARNES, Appellee. Civ. No. 90-4125-JLF. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois, Benton Division. October 31, 1990. *213 Darrell W. Dunham, William F. Meehan, Carbondale, Ill., for appellants. Terry Sharp, Mt. Vernon, Ill., for appellee. <
Traci Miskel v. James A. Karnes and Dwayne Maynardpublic domain
OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Traci Miskel appeals the district court’s denial of her petition for a *449 writ of habeas corpus under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner, who was convicted of driving while havi