Cases

ORDER HAROLD L. MURPHY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This ease is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [25]. I. Background A. Plaintiffs Allegations 1. The Parties Plaintiff is a citizen of the State of Georgia and resides in Dalton, Whitfield County, Georgia. (Am. Compl. (Docket Entry No. 21) ¶ 3.)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHERYL H. LIPMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 159), filed October 12, 2016, Plaintiffs Response (ECF No. 178), filed November 9, 2016, and Defendant’s Reply (ECF. No. 183), filed November 23, 2016. In addition to arguments attacking the merits - of

OPINION ⅛ ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: On February 22, 2016, the judge then presiding over this action, the Honorable Shira A. Scheindlin, issued an order dis*171missing all of the patent claims asserted by TiVo Research and Analytics, Inc. (“TRA”). Judge Scheindlin’s ruling was a reasoned attempt to follow what was, at the time, som

STARK, U.S District Judge MorphoSys, Inc. ("MorphoSys" or "Plaintiff") sued Janssen Biotech, Inc., Genmab US, Inc., and Genmab A/S (together, "Janssen" or "Defendants") for infringement of three patents on antibodies that bind to the CD38 protein. (D.I. 205) Pending before the Court are summary judgment motions filed by both sides. Janssen moves for summary judgment of (1) non-infringement of the "human" antibody claims (D.I. 384) a

ORDER GRANTING JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND JOHNSON & JOHNSON’S MOTION TO DISMISS JON P. McCALLA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss, filed February 12, 2016. (ECF No. 18). For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court dismisses al

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES ex rel. ALEXANDER No. 18-55643 VOLKHOFF, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, * D.C. No. 2:16-cv-06997- v. RGK-RAO JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA N.V.; JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; OPINION JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DE

The Supreme Court of South Carolina State of South Carolina ex rel. Alan Wilson, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondent, v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc., and/or Janssen, L.P., and Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Defendants, of whom Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES ex rel. ALEXANDER No. 18-55643 VOLKHOFF, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, * D.C. No. 2:16-cv-06997- v. RGK-RAO JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA N.V.; JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; OPINION JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DE

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court State of South Carolina ex. rel. Alan Wilson, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondent, v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc., and/or Janssen, L.P., and Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Defendants, of whom Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-206987 Appeal from Spartanburg County

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY. LOURIE, Circuit Judge. AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co., KG, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, Inc., and Abb-Vie Biotechnology Ltd. (formerly Abbott, collectively “AbbVie”) appeal from the final judgments of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in a patent infringement action and a patent interference action. In the infringemen

790 F.Supp.2d 868 (2011) ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. (f/k/a Alcon Manufacturing, Ltd.), Alcon Laboratories, Inc., and Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. APOTEX INC. and Apotex Corp., Defendants. No. 1:06-cv-1642-RLY-TAB. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. May 23, 2011. *872 Adam L. Perlman, Bruce

353 F.Supp.2d 231 (2005) PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. John R. NICHOLAS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Human Services for the State of Maine, and G. Steven Rowe, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Maine, Defendants. No. 00-157-B-H, No. 04-161-S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island.

[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276

Wallach, Circuit Judge. *1066 Appellants BTG International Limited et al. ("Appellants") sued Appellees Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al. ("Appellees") in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey ("District Court"), asserting that Appellees' Abbreviated New Drug Applicatio

PROST, Chief Judge. Appellants Sanofi, Aventisub LLC, Re-generan Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal from a final judgment of the district court holding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,829,165 (“’165 patent”) and 8,859,741 (“’741 patent”) not invalid and granting a permanent injunction enjoining sales of Appellants’

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § WHATABURGER RESTAURANTS No. 08-13-00280-CV LLC, § Appeal from Appellant, §

*1075 DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge. In June 2000, Michael Deutseh and Dr. Dietmar Wittmann formed Starsurgical, Inc. (“Star”), a Wisconsin corporation. Subsequently, they had a falling out resulting in the present diversity case. In 1987, Wittmann, an employee of the Medical College of Wisconsin (“MCW”), invented a pa

AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is AHS Staffing, LLC's ("AHS") Application for a Preliminary Injunction against Defendants Quest Staffing Group, Inc. ("Quest"), Jaclyn Ward ("Ward"), Michelle Swann ("Swann"), and Sandra Dominguez ("Dominguez") (collectively, "Defendants") (Dkt. # 15). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds that the motion should be granted.

DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH, United States District Judge Concord Management and Consulting LLC moves to dismiss the indictment on the ground that Special Counsel Robert Mueller was appointed unlawfully by Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Dkt. 36. The Court will deny Concord's motion. The Special Counsel's appointment complies with the Constitution's Appointments Clause because (1) the Special Counsel is an "inferior Officer"; and (2

DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge. In 1987, Dr. Dietmar H. Wittmann, an employee of the Medical College of Wisconsin, invented a surgical patch for use in abdominal surgery. In 1988, he assigned the rights to the patch to the college’s research foundation, which in turn granted a license to use the patch to Michael Deutsch. Deutsch attempted to obtain approval to market the pat