Cases

MEMORANDUM JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge. I. Background Sharonlee Smith (“Smith”) and her husband, Bernard Smith (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed suit in Baltimore County (Maryland) Circuit Court against Giant Food, LLC (“Giant”), and two Giant employees, Mike Haines and Jerry Gans (collectively, “Defendants”), claiming false imprisonment, intentional inflict

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion in which Judge NIEMEYER joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a separate concurring opinion. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: This is the latest in a series of appeals in copyright infringement cases arising out of the design and use of the logo for the Baltimore Ravens football team. In *3

981 A.2d 1 (2009) 188 Md. App. 1 GIANT OF MARYLAND, LLC v. Julia M. TAYLOR. No. 223, September Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 30, 2009. *3 Connie N. Bertram, Patricia A. Exposito (Winston & Strawn, LLP, on brief), Washington, DC, for Appellant. William Ford, Camp Spr

Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation 2021.11.15 Commission '00'07- 10:53:29 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER J. RONNIE GREER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiffs for class certification, [Docs. 201, 202]. The defendants have responded in opposition, [Doc. 228], and plaintiffs have replied, [Doc. 295]. Plaintiffs filed a supplemental memorandum in support of the motion for class certification, [Doc. 669], and defendants responded to th

OPINION KELLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff Wade C. House brought this negligence action against Giant of Maryland, LLC (“Giant”) and Michael S. Green to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained in a vehicular collision on August 5, 2002. After a three day trial, the jury awarded plaintiff $300,000. Plaintiff then petitioned to recover fees and costs under Fed. R.Civ.P. 37(c)(2) because

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE SEARS HOMETOWN AND OUTLET ) CONSOLIDATED STORES, INC. STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2019-0798-JTL POST-TRIAL OPINION Date Submitted: November 4, 2023 Date Decided: January 24, 2024 Ned Weinberger, Mark Richardson, Michael C. Wagner, Jiahui (Rose) Wang, LABATON KELLER SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Peter B. Andre

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

Held Invalid 26 C.F.R. § 54.9815-2713 (a)(1)(iv); 29 C.F.R. § 2590.715-2713 (a)(1)(iv);

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Waugh Chapel South, LLC, WCS LLC, WCS Properties Business Trust, and ELG Inglewood LLC (collectively, “the WCS plaintiffs”) sued United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 27 (“UFCW 27”), United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 400 (“UFCW 400”) and the Mid-Atlantic Retail Food Industry Joint Labor Management Fund (“the Fund”) (collectivel

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAUL W. GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge. This Memorandum and Order addresses the Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 19, filed by Defendant GEEK Squad® Subsidiary Best Buy Stores, L.P. (“Geek Squad”); Plaintiffs Charles Casey and Jeanette Casey’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Pis.’ S.J. Resp.”), ECF No. 21; and Defendant’s Reply to Pl

506 F.3d 315 (2007) Frederick E. BOUCHAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BON-TON DEPARTMENT STORES, INCORPORATED; Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of Maryland, Incorporated; Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of Annapolis, Incorporated; Burlington Coat Factory of Gaithersburg, Incorporated; Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Of Security, Incorporated; Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of Baltimore, Incorporated; Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of R

In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 15, 2022 S21G0798. EDIBLE IP, LLC v. GOOGLE, LLC. MCMILLIAN, Justice. This case involves Google LLC’s application of internet search algorithms, which it uses to auction off search terms for profit to advertisers, and the interests of Edible IP, LLC, which seeks to exercise control over the profit generated from its trade name and associated goodwill. In 2018, Edible IP brought an ac

416 B.R. 239 (2009) In re CARR & PORTER, LLC, Debtor. Tom C. Smith, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. J. Ridgely Porter, III, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-70238-SCS. Adversary No. 08-07051-SCS. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. March 17, 2009. *242 Robert V. Roussos, Roussos, Lassiter, G

801 F.Supp.2d 1363 (2011) Jimmy WOODARD, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, Defendant. No. 5:09-CV-428 (CAR). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. July 13, 2011. *1366 Michael G. Horner, W. Carl Reynolds, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff. Albert J. Decusati, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant. O

697 F.Supp.2d 1373 (2010) Donna HEATH and Andy Heath, Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-03665-JOF. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. March 11, 2010. *1374 Kenneth Brown Crawford, Tisinger Vance, P.C., Carrollton, GA, for Plaintiffs. Albert J. DeCusati,

ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment brought by Defendants U-Haul Co. of Indiana, Inc. and U-Haul International, Inc. (collectively, U-Haul). Plaintiff Austin Rock (Rock) resists, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) joins that resistance. The Court held a hearing on the Motion on May 10, 2013. Attorneys J

Mark S. Davis, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant FQSR, LCC, d/b/a KBP Foods, ("Defendant," or "KBP"). ECF No. 31. After examining the briefs and record, the Court finds that oral argument is unnecessary because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented, and oral argument would not aid in the decisional process. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b) ; E.D.