Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARLON ALONZO SMITH, No. 22-954 Agency No. Petitioner, A036-706-804 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2874 MARIA E. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States

OPINION Opinion by Justice Boatright This is a dispute about promotions in the City of Garland (“City”) fire department. The City sued appellant Randy E. Smith and many other City fire fighters, including the people who are now appellees in this case. The City voluntarily; dismissed Smith from the suit, but-he later intervened, suing the City and the fire fighters who the City had not dismis

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Defendant David Wayne Garland appeals after his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) and 21 U.S.C. § 846. Garland’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87

RILEY, Chief Judge. Garland Lott, Jr. applied for social security disability insurance (SSDI) benefits under Title II and supplemental security income (SSI) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Lott’s applications were denied initially by the Commissioner, on reconsideration, and by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). After the Appeals Council declined to review the ALJ’s

CALKINS, J. [¶ 1] Lonnie Garland appeals from a summary judgment entered in Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mead, J.) in favor of Dr. Joshua Sherwin. Because we agree with the court that Garland’s medical malpractice action is barred by the statute of limitations, we affirm the judgment. [¶ 2] On June 18, 1996, an x-ray was performed on Garland at Eastern Maine Medical Center and read by Sherwin.

KRUGER, J. *1141 A jury convicted defendant Floyd Daniel Smith of one count of first degree murder ( Pen. Code, § 187 ), and found true an alleged special circumstance that he committed *11 t

BENKE, J. *769I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Kiesha Renee Smith and Michael Mitchell appeal from their judgments of conviction for the murder of Josephine Kelley. In a prior *770opinion, we reversed both defendants' conviction

AARON, J. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Kiesha Renee Smith and Michael Mitchell appeal from their judgments of conviction for the murder of Josephine Kelley. We are compelled to reverse both defendants' convictions due to prejudicial error in the joint trial before separate juries.1 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A.

SLOUGH J. *719Defendant Michael Lee Smith appeals from the summary denial of his Proposition 47 resentencing petition. (Pen.Code, § 1170.18.) Using Riverside County Superior Court's standard petitioning form, Smith sought to have two felony second degree commercial burglary (§ 459)1 convictions (counts 1, 2) designated as mis

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JASWINDER SINGH, No. 23-95 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-276-233 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Arg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHNNIE L. JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-654-MJS PAMELA BONDI, 1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Between 2011 and 2015, Plaintiff Johnnie Jacobs worked in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (“FBI”) Office of Equal Employment Opportunity Affairs as

Opinion SLOUGH, J.— Defendant Michael Lee Smith appeals from the summary denial of his Proposition 47 resentencing petition. (Pen. Code, § 1170.18.) Using Riverside County Superior Court’s standard petitioning form, Smith sought to have two felony second degree commercial burglary (§ 459)

403 S.E.2d 4 (1991) Doris Rock GARLAND v. Jesse Thomas GARLAND. Record No. 0751-90-2. Court of Appeals of Virginia. April 2, 1991. *5 Ronald M. Maupin (Gardner & Maupin, on briefs), Spotsylvania, for appellant. Carroll E. Smith, Fredericksburg, for appellee. Present: BARROW, COLE and WILLIS, JJ. BARROW, J

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CLAUDE STEPHEN BENT, No. 22-1910 Petitioner, Agency No. 037-050-176 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Bo

Opinion BUTZ, J. This appeal concerns the scope of the government’s jurisdiction under the federal Clean Water Act (the Act; 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.) to regulate water pollutants. Enacted in 1972, the Act prohibits any person from discharging a pollutant into “navigable waters”—i.e., into “the waters of the United States”—from a “point source” (a discrete conveyance of pollutants) without a permit. (See 33 U.S

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CLAUDE STEPHEN BENT, No. 22-1910 Petitioner, Agency No. 037-050-176 v. ORDER AND MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney AMENDED General, OPINION

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

21-6265(L) Stankiewicz v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 (Argued: February 21, 2023 Decided: May 31, 2024) Docket Nos. 21-6265(L), 22-6121(Con) ALEKSANDRA MALGORZATA STANKIEWICZ, Petitio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LISA M. KINCAID, Plaintiff, y Civil Action No. 17-1941 (RDM) MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Lisa Kincaid was employed as a special agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ (“ATF” or the “Bureau”) for over thirty years. As relevant here, she was assigned to work as an investigator in the Bureau’s Internal Affairs Division (“IAD”)