⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Smith v. DPS”

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 2004 OK 22; 89 P.3d 1062
89 P.3d 1062 (2004) 2004 OK 22 Jimmy D. SMITH, Plaintiff/Appellee. v. STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendant/Appellant. No. 99,157. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. March 30, 2004. *1063 HARGRAVE, J. ¶ 1 Plaintiff/appellee Jimmy D. Smith's driver's license was revoked for 180 da
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010-09-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2010 OK CIV APP 122; 241 P.3d 1164
241 P.3d 1164 (2010) 2010 OK CIV APP 122 Rex Everett GILWORTH, Sr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma ex rel., DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendant/Appellee. No. 107,871. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3. September 29, 2010. <
Smith v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 324 F. App'x 549
MEMORANDUM ** Neale E. Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b) for failure to comply with a discovery order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Payne v. Exxon Corp., 121 F.3d 503, 507 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm. The district court did not ab
Smith v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 324 F. App'x 549
MEMORANDUM ** Neale E. Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b) for failure to comply with a discovery order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Payne v. Exxon Corp., 121 F.3d 503, 507 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm. The district court did not ab
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007-01-30 · Published · cited 2× · 2007 OK CIV APP 47; 162 P.3d 936
162 P.3d 936 (2007) 2007 OK CIV APP 47 James W. ROBERTSON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent/Appellee. No. 103,312. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 4. January 30, 2007. Certiorari Denied April 30, 2007. Kevin D. Buchanan, Garrison, Brown, Carlson &
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 533 S.W.3d 488
OPINION Opinion by Justice Contreras We issued our original opinion in this case on February 23, 2017. Appellant, the Texas Department of Public Safety (the “Department”), and appellee Laura Smith have each filed motions for rehearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.1. We deny the motions for rehearing but withdraw our prior opinion and judgment and substitute the following opinio
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005-12-30 · Published · cited 0× · 2006 OK CIV APP 8; 129 P.3d 177
129 P.3d 177 (2005) 2006 OK CIV APP 8 Jeffery S. SIMIC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendant/Appellee. No. 102,386. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. December 30, 2005. Royce A. Hobbs, Stillwater, OK, for Plaintiff/Appellant. Kevin L. McClure, Oklahoma Department of
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018-01-02 · Published · cited 0× · 237 So. 3d 1270
Certiorari - Granted.
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018-05-24 · Published · cited 4× · 243 So. 3d 172
CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. While we address three issues, only one dispositive issue is before the Court: whether the Employee Appeals Board properly dismissed the Appellees' claims for lack of jurisdiction due to the untimely filing of the appeal. We hold that it properly dismissed the Appellees' claims for lack of jurisdiction. The course of the proceedings, as outlined
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019-09-03 · Published · cited 0× · 831 S.E.2d 658
AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999-09-21 · Published · cited 2× · 984 P.2d 559; 194 Ariz. 473
984 P.2d 559 (1998) 194 Ariz. 473 Merlin Lyneer CLOUSE, individually, as surviving spouse of Norma Clouse and on behalf of Guy Michael Clouse, surviving son of Norma Clouse; Guy Michael Clouse, individually; Lisandro Salinas and Debra Maria Salinas, individually and as husband and wife; Amber Salinas, Lissandra Salinas and Nathaniel Salinas, minor children of Lisandro Salinas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of Arizona, DE
Smith v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-09-25 · Published · cited 0× · 202 F. App'x 265
MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s response to this court’s July 18, 2006 *266order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropr
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012-02-14 · Published · cited 0× · 465 F. App'x 290
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Russell Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See S
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003-07-01 · Published · cited 2× · 2003 OK CIV APP 66; 74 P.3d 623
74 P.3d 623 (2003) 2003 OK CIV APP 66 Michael H. McCOWN, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendant/Appellant. No. 98,319. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3. July 1, 2003. *624 Stephen G. Fabian, Jr., Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff/Appellee.<
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2018-08-31 · Published · cited 0× · 251 So. 3d 1084
WEIMER, J., recused.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015-05-19 · Published · cited 0× · 773 S.E.2d 574; 241 N.C. App. 176; 2015 WL 2374493; 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 397
INMAN, Judge. Stanley Shane Smith ("plaintiff") appeals pro sefrom an order entered in favor of defendant North Carolina Department of Public Safety ("DPS") on plaintiff's breach of contract claim. On appeal, plaintiff argues that the trial court erred by concluding that DPS did not materially breach a settlement agreement that it entered into with plaintiff resolving a previous dispute. Due to plaintiff's s
Smith v. Statepublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999-02-25 · Published · cited 157× · 733 So. 2d 793; 1999 WL 101725
733 So.2d 793 (1999) Terry Ray SMITH v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 97-DP-00427-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. February 25, 1999. Willie J. Perkins, Sr., Greenwood, Attorney for Appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Leslie S. Lee, Attorneys for Appellee. EN BANC. SMITH, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Terry Ray Smith was indicted by
Smith v. Statepublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998-12-10 · Published · cited 220× · 724 So. 2d 280; 1998 WL 852579
724 So.2d 280 (1998) Jerome Pete SMITH v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 93-DP-00821-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 10, 1998. *286 Barry J. Fisher, Leman Gandy, Leland H. Jones, III, Greenwood, Attorneys for Appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Jeffrey A. Klingfuss, Attorney for Appellee. EN BANC.
Smith v. Statepublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998-12-10 · Published · cited 210× · 729 So. 2d 1191; 1998 WL 852938
729 So.2d 1191 (1998) Clyde Wendell SMITH v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 93-DP-01470-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 10, 1998. Rehearing Denied February 25, 1999. *1195 Whitman D. Mounger, W.S. Stuckey, Greenwood, Attorneys for Appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Marvin L. White, Jr., At
Smith v. Arizonapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-21 · Published · cited 88× · 602 U.S. 779
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 779–820 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ