Cases

PER CURIAM: Joyce Hargress appeals the district court's decision affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405 (g), 1383(c)(3). On November 6, 2017, this

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Julian Harman appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and entering judgment for the Commissioner in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed th

PER CURIAM: Joyce Hargress appeals the district court’s decision affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). After careful review, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND FACTS In May 2013,

Reversed and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge KEENAN joined. DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Constance L. Patterson (“Patterson”) appeals from a district-court order affirming the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) decision to deny her application for disability

OPINION MERRITT, Circuit Judge. Ricky Lee Smith filed an application for supplemental security income resulting from disability. A hearing was conducted before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”). The ALJ issued an unfavorable decision, finding that Smith was not disabled under the Social Security Act. The notice of.decision stated that Smith had sixty d

PER CURIAM: *1156 This case requires us to consider the boundaries of "payment based wholly on service as a member of a uniformed service" for the purposes of Social Security benefit calculations. We agree with the Social Security Administration's interpretation, and affirm the district c

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Annmarie Serem appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. Our review of the Commissioner’s determination is limited to evaluating whet

PER CURIAM: Cornelius Washington appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s (the “Commissioner”) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Mr. Washington primarily argues that the Appeals Council erred when it refused to consi

ED CARNES, Chief Judge: Sonya Hunter appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for remand and affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision to deny her application for disability insurance benefits. Hunter contends that the district court should have remanded the case to the Commissioner for further proceedin

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s orders remanding this' matter to the Commissioner and denying Turner’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *218error. Acc

PER CURIAM: Shekenia Gay appeals the district court’s order affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits, 42 U.S.C. § 1381. On appeal, Gay argues that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) failed to give adequate weight to the opinion of her treating physician. No reversible error has been shown; we affirm. Our review of the Com

*1044ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Ralph R. Erickson, District Judge United States District Court Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and' Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge.1 The Report and Recommendation recommends that the defendant

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher McCummings appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of McCummings’ application for supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

MEMORANDUM *** Marilyn Howell appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The panel’s review is “essentially the same as that undertaken by the district court.” Stone v. Heckler, 761 F.2d 530, 532 (9th Cir.1985

PER CURIAM: Leticia Medina appeals the district court’s order affirming the Social .Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. She challenges the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) on several grounds. First, she contends that the ALJ erred in failing to find that all of her impairments were severe. Second, she argues that the ALJ did not adequately explain why he gave lit

MEMORANDUM * Patsy Werner appeals from the Commissioner’s denial of disability benefits, arguing that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) made a series of factual errors that prejudiced her claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse. The ALJ misread the handwritten notes of Werner’s psychiatrist, Dr. James Douglas, and incorrectly found that Dr. Douglas’ notes w

MEMORANDUM *** Marilyn Howell appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The panel’s review is “essentially the same as that undertaken by the district court.” Stone v. Heckler, 761 F.2d 530, 532 (9th Cir.1985

659 F.3d 1228 (2011) Steven TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-35732. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 14, 2011.[*] Filed October 27, 2011. *1230 Ralph Wilborn, Wilborn & Wilborn, P.C., Green Valley

*636MEMORANDUM * Vincent Trulson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, disputing whether the administrative law judge (ALJ) properly found his second application for disability benefits barred by the res judicata effect of a final decision on his first application. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S

MEMORANDUM * Patsy Werner appeals from the Commissioner’s denial of disability benefits, arguing that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) made a series of factual errors that prejudiced her claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse. The ALJ misread the handwritten notes of Werner’s psychiatrist, Dr. James Douglas, and incorrectly found that Dr. Douglas’ notes w