Cases

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Durig v. Youngstown, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4719.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or o

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0189p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JEFF SMITH, │ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

[Cite as State ex rel. Youngstown Professional Firefighters IAFF Local 312 v. Youngstown, 2021-Ohio-539.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE EX REL. YOUNGSTOWN PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS IAFF LOCAL 312 ET AL., Relators, v.

[Cite as McCullough v. Youngstown School Dist., 2019-Ohio-3965.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY MAXIMUS MCCULLOUGH et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. YOUNGSTOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Ap

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0221p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOHN GEORGE, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

[Cite as Lawrence v. Youngstown, 2012-Ohio-6237.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT KEITH LAWRENCE, ) ) CASE NO. 09 MA 189 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ) ) - VS -

[Cite as E. Ohio Gas Co. v. Youngstown, 2020-Ohio-731.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY EAST OHIO GAS COMPANY DBA DOMINION ENERGY OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN,

[Cite as Youngstown v. Durrett, 2010-Ohio-1313.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN/ ) STATE OF OHIO, ) CASE NO. 09 MA 57 ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, )

[Cite as Youngstown v. Walker, 2011-Ohio-1174.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN, ) ) CASE NO. 09 MA 176 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, ) ) - VS -

JUDGES: Hon. Carol Ann Robb, Hon. Cheryl L. Waite, Hon. Mary DeGenaro OPINION ROBB, P.J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellant Albert Matasy appeals the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court granting *747summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Defendant-Appellee Youngstown Ohio Hospital Company, LLC.

[Cite as Lawrence v. Youngstown, 2011-Ohio-998.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT KEITH LAWRENCE, ) ) CASE NO. 09 MA 189 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ) ) - VS -

Lanzinger, J., dissenting. {¶ 27} Because the majority interprets the reach of Section 34, Article II of the Ohio Constitution too broadly, I respectfully dissent. In plain terms, Section 34 *162enables the General Assembly to pass laws related to hours of labor, minimum wage, and the health, safety, and ge

76 F.Supp.2d 810 (1999) Veronica DOTSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO, et al., Defendants. No. 4:99-CV-940. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. November 17, 1999. *811 Alan S. Belkin, Law Offices of Alan S. Belkin, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff. Neil D. Schor, Harrington, Hoppe & Mitchel

[Cite as Clark v. Park Vista of Youngstown, 2026-Ohio-2842.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY SHAKELA CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PARK VISTA OF YOUNGSTOWN, ET AL., Defendants-Ap

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissenting. I agree that the Sisters’ proposed use of the convent may be incidental to the church’s primary use of the property. I also believe that providing assistance to poverty-stricken mothers is a worthy endeav- or. Nevertheless, I believe that the plain language of the Youngstown Zoning Ordinance precludes the Sisters from using the convent as a dwelling. A. Zoning Intent

[Cite as Home S. & L. of Youngstown v. Snowville Subdivision, 2012-Ohio-4594.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97985 HOME SAVINGS AND LOAN OF YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO PLAINTIF

[Cite as Naylor Family Partnership v. Home S. & L. Co. of Youngstown, 2014-Ohio-2704.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO NAYLOR FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2013-L-096 - vs -

Per Curiam. The appellees’ primary contention is that the appeal should be dismissed for failure of the appellant to join as appellees all the persons required by Section 5717.04, Revised Code. On the other hand, appellant contends that it has joined all the necessary parties, that the only necessary parties are those who were active participants in the proceedings before the board, and that the jo

The council of the city of Youngstown enacted an ordinance levying an annual excise tax *Page 312 of three per cent on the gross revenue derived from the operation of trackless trolley coaches upon the streets of the city, "for the purpose of contributing to the cost of maintaining and repairing the streets traversed by such coaches." The Youngstown Municipal Railway Company, a corporation operating a system of motor coaches and trackless trolley c

These appeals are on questions of law and fact from judgments in separate cases permanently enjoining the defendants from levying and collecting income taxes under the provisions of certain ordinances of the municipalities on the ground that such ordinances are repugnant to Section 2, Article I and Section 4, Article XIII of the Constitution of Ohio, and to theFourteenth Amendment to the C