⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Smith v. C3 Presents, L.L.C.”

Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018-04-30 · Published · cited 4× · 2017 IL App (1st) 161177
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-09-30 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 Ohio 3509
[Cite as I Love This Bar, L.L.C. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 2022-Ohio-3509.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT I Love This Bar, LLC, : Appellant-Appellant, : No. 21AP-111 v. : (C.P.C. No
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed July 15, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00730-CV C3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Appellant V. GIGABIT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001-03-30 · Published · cited 19× · 157 F. Supp. 2d 903; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3791; 2001 WL 321056
157 F.Supp.2d 903 (2001) C.L.U.B. (Civil Liberties for Urban Believers), Christ Center, Christian Covenant Outreach Church, His Word Ministries to All Nations, Christian Bible Church, Monte DeSion (Mount Zion) Church, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant. No. 94CV6151. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 30, 2001.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ohio 1226
[Cite as State ex rel. Smith v. Indus. Comm., 2024-Ohio-1226.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Marion Smith, : Relator, : No. 22AP-112 v. :
Smith v. Astruepublic domain
District Court, N.D. New York · 2012-09-13 · Published · cited 2× · 896 F. Supp. 2d 163; 2012 WL 4052275; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130805
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER NORMAN A. MORDUE, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Ricardo Smith brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of the decision by defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, to deny his application for supplemental security income. Plaintiff alleges that he has been
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-05-12 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Case No. 08-864V Filed: April 18, 2016 [TO BE PUBLISHED] ************************* LISA SMITH, * * * Petitioner,
State v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003-01-07 · Published · cited 2× · 655 N.W.2d 347; 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 1448; 2003 WL 42276
655 N.W.2d 347 (2003) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Eric NMN SMITH, Appellant. No. C3-02-96. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. January 7, 2003. *350 Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Amy Klobuchar, Hennepin County Attorney, David C. Brown, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent. John M.
Smith v. Barnhartpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003-03-18 · Published · cited 1× · 59 F. App'x 901
ORDER Robin Smith appeals the district court’s decision upholding the denial of her application for Social Security disability benefits, claiming that the final decision of the Commissioner was not supported by substantial evidence. We agree, and accordingly vacate the district court’s judgment and remand this matter for further proceedings. 1. Medical History Smith, a high school graduate, was
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008-08-26 · Published · cited 6× · 573 F. Supp. 2d 599; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65346; 2008 WL 3971097
(2008) Harry SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:02-cv-212 (CFD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 26, 2008. RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, District Judge. Table of Contents I
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008-07-15 · Published · cited 0× · 663 S.E.2d 12; 191 N.C. App. 399; 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1380
WANDA FIPPS, Employee, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BABSON AND SMITH TRUCKING, Employer, and KEY RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Carrier, Defendants-Appellants No. COA07-1361 Court of Appeals of North Carolina Filed July 15, 2008 This case not for publication Brumbaugh, Mu & King, P.A., by Nicole D. Wray, for plaintiff-appellee. Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Ga
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016-04-28 · Published · cited 3× · 2016 Ohio 2731
[Cite as State ex rel. Smith v. Ohio Pub. Emps. Retirement Sys., 2016-Ohio-2731.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT The State of Ohio ex rel. Donna J. Smith, : Relator, : v. : No. 14AP-1060 Ohio Public Employee[s] Retirement : (RE
District Court, D. Maryland · 2003-02-13 · Published · cited 26× · 247 F. Supp. 2d 734; 2003 WL 554673
247 F.Supp.2d 734 (2003) Victoria RACHEL-SMITH v. FTDATA, INC. No. CIV.A. DKC 2001-3707. United States District Court, D. Maryland. February 13, 2003. *736 Robert Scott Oswald, Noto and Oswald PC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Elena D. Marcuss, McGuire Woods LLP, Baltimore, MD, Christina Volzer Bailey, John J. Michels, Jr
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999-11-05 · Published · cited 0× · 745 So. 2d 223; 98 La.App. 1 Cir. 2180; 1999 La. App. LEXIS 3099; 1999 WL 1036832
|..CARTER, C.J. This is an appeal by defendant, Shoney’s Inc. (Shoney’s), from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Della Weise Smith, in the amount of $22,570.21, for personal injuries she sustained as a result of an incident at a Shoney’s restaurant in Baton Rouge. FACTS On the evening of June 12, 1993, Smith was in the buffet line at the Shoney’s Restaurant located on College Drive in
Smith v. Crumppublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996-10-02 · Published · cited 10× · 476 S.E.2d 817; 223 Ga. App. 52
476 S.E.2d 817 (1996) 223 Ga. App. 52 SMITH v. CRUMP. No. A96A2145. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 2, 1996. *818 Johnson, Dangle & Parmer, Robert F. Dangle, Barton R. Bright, III, Carrollton, for appellant. Smith, Gambrell & Russell, Matthew S. Coles, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers,
Smith v. Crumppublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996-10-02 · Published · cited 16× · 476 S.E.2d 817; 223 Ga. App. 52; 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3553; 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 1056
476 S.E.2d 817 (1996) 223 Ga. App. 52 SMITH v. CRUMP. No. A96A2145. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 2, 1996. *818 Johnson, Dangle & Parmer, Robert F. Dangle, Barton R. Bright, III, Carrollton, for appellant. Smith, Gambrell & Russell, Matthew S. Coles, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers,
Keevan v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996-11-18 · Published · cited 18× · 100 F.3d 644; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29739
100 F.3d 644 Laura KEEVAN; Verna Mae Jones; Sheila Gordon; Melissa Ann Wagner; Laverna Goree; Tanya Goins; Carol Jean Klaus, and on behalf of the class, Appellants,v.Donald SMITH, Superintendent of Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center; Ron Schmitz, Superintendent of Kansas City Community Release Center; Janet Schneider, Superintendent of St. Louis Community Release Center; Thelma Grandison, Superintendent of Chillicothe Correctional Cente
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · 2007-01-11 · Published · cited 0×
THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: 22 August 2006 11 January 2007 AD UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ______ L. & J.G. Stickley, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006-10-27 · Published · cited 0× · 956 So. 2d 1164; 2006 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 657; 2006 WL 3041493
Billy Smith was injured in an automobile accident on May 2, 1997. Smith was insured by two State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") automobile-insurance policies that provided a combined total of $50,000 in uninsured/underinsured-motorist ("UM/UIM") coverage. The driver of the automobile that collided with Smith's vehicle was insured; her policy limits were $25,000, which were paid to Smith. Smith sought payment of the policy limits of his UM/ UIM coverage from St