Cases

Memorandum Opinion LIAM O’GRADY, District Judge. This Memorandum Opinion constitutes the Court’s findings of-fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), following a bench trial. For the reasons set forth below, judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. I. Background This suit arises out of an employment relationsh

Mercure, J. P. Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered October 31, 1996 in Columbia County, which granted a cross motion by defendants Robert E. Chandler and PM AG Products, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against them. The record shows that the June 1, 1993 vehicular collision underlying this action took place in the following manner. Pl

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. In the end in these cross-appeals after a bench trial, we leave the parties just where they were, as we see no error by the trial court. Plaintiff Diping Anderson was a Postal Police Officer (PPO) employed by the U.S. Postal Service and terminated on September 9, 2013. Her Title VII lawsuit alleged that her termination as a PPO was unlawfully

ORDER After spats with coworkers occurring on a single day in 2014, Wayne Fellers brought this action against the United States Postal Service, claiming he was subjected to a hostile work environment based on his race and sex. The district court entered summary judgment for the Postal Service, explaining that a reasonable jury could not find from the evidence that a hostile work environment existed or that the

Hon. Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge Following a bench trial, the Court found that the Postal Service's termination of Diping Anderson ("Anderson") from her position as a Postal Police Officer was retaliatory, in violation of Title VII. Anderson v. Brennan, No. CV 14-13380-PBS, 2017 WL 1032502 (

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG DISTRICT, JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, Linda Brennan (“Brennan”), has brought suit against Thomas F. Ferreira and Barbara Ferreira (collectively “T & B Ferreira”); John Jeff Ferreira and Tammy Ferreira (collectively “J & T Ferreira”); Hicks Street, Inc.; Hilda Miranda; Three Big Dogs Irrevocable Trust; Prescott, Bullard & </

OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This-matter is before the Court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Megan Brennan, United States Postmaster General (Doc. 45). Plaintiff Larry Wilson filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. 48) to which Defendant replied (Doc. 52). The issues before the Court are fully briefed and ripe for review. For the reasons that follow

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Javier Cabral appeals the dismissal of his Title VII retaliation claim. According to Cabral, his employer suspended him for two days because he complained of workplace discrimination and harassment. Because the district court’s procedural error was harmless, and Cabral’s two-day suspension did not constitute a materially adverse action, we affirm.

31 N.J. 353 (1960) 157 A.2d 497 SEAN SMITH, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, THOMAS SMITH AND THOMAS SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, AND JOHN FLANNELLY, NELLIE SMITH, FRANCES SMITH AND THOMAS SMITH, PLAINTIFFS, v. PHYLLIS BRENNAN, FELIX J. BRENNAN, MARIE CLAIRE GALBRAITH AND GEORGE GALBRAITH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued November 2

*834 RANDOLPH, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. The McMullans filed their complaint against U.S. Bancorp, U.S. Bank N.A. (collectively the Bank), and the Johnson Group in Smith County Circuit Court. In answering the complaint, all defendants pled improper venue. The McMullans fi

REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: I join the majority in concluding (1) that the district court judgment can be affirmed insofar as it (a) granted class certification to the Brennan Intervenors, and (b) declared Ciro Dellaporte not a member of a protected class entitled to relief under the challenged settlement, but (2) that the judgment must be vacated in all other respects and remande

Fremont-Smith, Thayer, J. The plaintiffs ask the court to reconsider the grant of summary judgment [23 Mass. L. Rptr. 683] to the defendant Paul D. Maloy (“Maloy”). As ground for their motion, plaintiffs argue that it was foreseeable that the defendant’s faulty plans would injure or cause diminution in the plaintiffs’ property value, which would be more than mere economic loss. In support of the proposition that the plaintiffs’

Fremont-Smith, Thayer, J. As to Count IX (breach of contract by Maloy) there was no contract between the plaintiffs and Maloy. Although the contract between the designer of the townhouse (Morgan) and Maloy (a professional engineer) was intended to provide plans to permit a building permit to be obtained by plaintiffs, and plaintiffs did pay money to Morgan expressly to hire Maloy for that purpose, the Court does not consider thes

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 6, 2012 Session JOSEPH BRENNAN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sumner County No. 395-2011 Dee David Gay, Judge No. M2012-00187-CCA-R3-PC Filed December 4, 2012 Petitioner, Joseph Brennan, pled guilty to two counts of incest and two counts of attempted r

526 F.Supp.2d 378 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, v. Robert BRENNAN, Robert Garcia, Richard Czark, Louis Sito, Gus Acosta, Ed Smith, Dennis Springer, John Faiella, Dorothy McKillop, Defendants. Nos. 05-CR-747, 06-CR-169, 06-CR-170, 06-CR-171, 06-CR-172, 06-CR-173, 06-CR-334, 06-CR-335, 06-CR-336. United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 19, 2007.

OPINION ON REHEARING SUE WALKER, Justice. On June 21, 2012, this court issued an opinion reversing the trial court’s judgment and remanding Appellants’ claims for declaratory judgment, for injunctive relief, and for a writ of mandamus asserted against all Appellees, to the trial court for further proceedings. Appellee City of Ale-do filed a motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration. After

OPINION N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants (Plaintiffs) are automated teller machine (ATM) cardholders, who allege horizontal price fixing of fees paid to the ATM owners by the banks (issuing the ATM cards to the cardholders) when cardholders retrieve cash from an ATM not owned by their bank. Plaintiffs do not directly pay the allegedly fix

638 So.2d 1320 (1994) Terrilee BRENNAN v. James M. BRENNAN. No. 92-CA-01077. Supreme Court of Mississippi. June 23, 1994. *1321 Dempsey M. Levi, Levi & Denham, Ocean Springs, for appellant. Herbert J. Stelly, Gulfport, for appellee. Before PRATHER, P.J., and PITTMAN and SMITH, JJ. PITTMAN, Justice, for th

MEMORANDUM FULLAM, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff, Terri A. Brennan, purchased an over-the-counter drug (a nasal decongestant) at a Rite Aid drugstore in Trevose, Pennsylvania. After she returned to her home, she discovered that the expiration date of the product had passed several months before the sale. She has brought this putative class action on behalf of all persons in the United States

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) ID No. 1512004476 ) MICAH SMITH, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: January 22, 2024 Decided: April 30, 2024 Upon Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief