Cases

260 Ga. 88 (1990) 389 S.E.2d 757 SMART et al. v. MILLER. S90A0538. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided April 5, 1990. *90 Harrison & Willis, Randall P. Harrison, for appellants. V. J. Adams, Jr., for appellee. WELTNER, Justice. Miller claims ownership to real property b

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Jon Smart, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-001754 Appeal From Clarendon County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5830 Submitted May 14, 2020 – Filed July 7, 2021 AFFIRMED

978 So.2d 308 (2008) SMART DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC v. Michael B. MILLER. No. 2008-C-0210. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 28, 2008. In re Miller, Michael B.;—Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Acadia, City Court of Crowley, No. 20,920; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 07-670. Denied.

970 So.2d 49 (2007) SMART DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC v. Michael B. MILLER. No. 07-670. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. October 31, 2007. Rehearing Denied December 26, 2007. *50 Michael B. Miller, Miller & Miller, Crowley, LA, for Defendant/Appellant, Michael B. Miller. Brian F. Blackwell, Bla

HUNSTEIN, Justice. Appellant Norman Smart was convicted of malice murder and related offenses in connection with the beating death of his wife, Lauren Smart, and was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. On appeal, Appellant contends, inter alia, that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his convictions and that the trial court erroneously admit

COBB, Judge. The issue on this appeal concerns the correct interpretation of section 743.07(2), Florida Statutes (1991). The parties’ marriage was dissolved in 1987 and on February 26, 1992, the former wife filed a supplemental petition for modification of the final judgment basically alleging changed circumstances and asking for increased child support payments for her two children. Additionally, the former wife requested an

546 F.Supp.2d 681 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert Joseph SMART, Defendant. No. 06-4073-01-CR-C-SOW. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Central Division. March 10, 2008. *682 Lawrence Miller, United States Attorney, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff. Troy K. Stabenow, Federal Public Defender'

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER David J. Hale, Judge, United States District Court This lawsuit involves a business dispute between American and New Zealand companies involved in the production, distribution, and sale of ready-to-drink alcoholic beverages known as “twistee shots.” Plaintiff Smart Beverage Group was the exclusive North American importer and distributor of twistee shots for over three years. Defe

107 S.W.3d 1 (2002) Armer EARWOOD, et al., Appellants, v. Neville G. SMART, Jr., et al., Appellees. No. 04-00-00867-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. January 9, 2002. Opinion on Overruling of Rehearing August 14, 2002. Rehearing Overruled March 14, 2003. J. Ken Nunley, Joe M. Davis, Kelly Putney Rogers, Nunley, Davis, Joll

715 S.E.2d 826 (2011) 311 Ga. App. 434 SN INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al. v. SMART PROPERTIES, INC. et al. No. A11A1444. Court of Appeals of Georgia. August 16, 2011. *827 Sabrina Hassanali, for appellants. Meriwether & Tharp, Robert Lane Tharp, Alpharetta, for appellees. ELLINGTON, Chief Judg

501 F.Supp.2d 1042 (2007) POLYVISION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SMART TECHNOLOGIES INC. and Smart Technologies Corporation, Defendants. Smart Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. PolyVision Corporation and Paragram Sales Company, Inc., Defendants. Nos. 1:03-CV-476, 1:04-CV-713. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 1, 2007.

26 Kan. App.2d 808 (1999) 995 P.2d 407 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CEDRICK L. SMART, Appellant. No. 81,415. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed December 30, 1999. *809 Craig Durham, assistant appellate defender, and Jessica R. Kunen, chief appellate defender, for appellant.

560 S.E.2d 92 (2002) 253 Ga. App. 649 SMART v. The STATE. No. A01A2479. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 11, 2002. *95 Mark J. Nathan, Savannah, for appellant. Spencer Lawton, Jr., Dist. Atty., Christine S. Barker, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. *93

659 S.E.2d 838 (2008) SMART DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC v. HALL et al. No. A07A2159. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 24, 2008. Alston & Bird, Leslie E. Wood, Robert P. Riordan, Atlanta, for appellant. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Isaac Byrd, Deputy Attorney General, Sidney R. Barrett, Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, Robin G. Cohen, Assistan

501 F.Supp.2d 1068 (2007) POLYVISION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SMART TECHNOLOGIES INC. and Smart Technologies Corporation, Defendants. Smart Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. PolyVision Corporation and Paragram Sales Company, Inc., Defendants. Nos. 1:03-CV-476, 1:04-CV-713. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 1, 2007.

499 F.3d 1078 (2007) Kirk WEBB, individually and as class representative; Mann & Cook, a legal partnership, for itself and as class representative, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SMART DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. No. 05-56282. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 2007. Filed August 27, 2007.

210 S.W.3d 439 (2007) David E. MILLER II, Appellant, v. Andrea N. MILLER, Respondent. No. WD 66131. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 2, 2007. *441 Brent L. Winterberg, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Andrea N. Miller, Raytown, MO, pro se. Before SMART, P.J., and EDWIN H. SMITH and HARDWICK, JJ.</

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Megan K. Cavanagh Brian K. Zahra

336 F.Supp.2d 714 (2004) STEELCASE INC., Polyvision Corporation, and Greensteel, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. SMART TECHNOLOGIES INC. and Smart Technologies Corporation, Defendants. No. 1:03-CV-476. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 5, 2004. *715 *716 Francis DiGiov

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge. Debtors-appellants Smart World Technologies, LLC, Freewwweb, LLC, and Smart World Communications, Inc. (collectively, “Smart World”) appeal from an unreported decision and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Denise L. Cote, Judge), Smart World Techs., LLC v. Juno Online Servs., Inc. (In re Smart World Techs., LLC), No. 03 Civ. 9467, 2004