Cases

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Smart Communications Holding, Inc., : Petitioner : : v. : No. 80 C.D. 2019 : Bruce Wishnefsky, : Respondent : PER CURIAM ORDER NOW, September 16, 2020, the “Application for Relief – Request to Report Unreported Opinion” filed by

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JONATHAN LOGAN and SMART COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING, INC., Appellants, v. JANICE LOGAN, individually and as trustee for the James Logan Family Trust dated February 10, 2021, and ALEXIS LOGAN, Appellees. No. 2D2023-1798 November 22, 2024 Appeal

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MELVIN W. ENGELKE, III, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. JAMES LOGAN; JONATHAN LOGAN; HLFIP HOLDING, INC.; MAILGUARD, INC.; SMART COMMUNICATIONS DESOTO, INC.; SMART COMMUNICATIONS WEST, INC.; SMART COMMUNICATIONS COLLIER, INC.; SMART COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING, INC.; SM

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join virtually all of Chief Judge Bris-coe’s thorough, persuasive opinion. But, I respectfully dissent on Part IV(A)(2). There, the majority rejects the Petitioners’ challenge to the sufficiency of the budget for the Universal Service Fund. On this limited issue, I respectfully dissent. In my view, the FC

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2496 ___________________________ Smart Communications Collier Inc. lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Pope County Sheriff’s Office; Shane Jones

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1120 Doc: 60 Filed: 07/22/2025 Pg: 1 of 27 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1120 CPI SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VIVINT SMART HOME, INC., f/k/a Mosaic Acquisition Corp.;

Case: 22-1654 Document: 66 Page: 1 Filed: 09/09/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GOPRO, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-1654, 2022-1691 ______________________ Appeals from the

Case: 22-2109 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 04/04/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AI VISUALIZE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MACH7 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2022-2109 _____________________

Appellate Case: 23-1189 Document: 010111079946 Date Filed: 07/16/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH July 16, 2024 UN

Case: 22-1654 Document: 66 Page: 1 Filed: 09/09/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GOPRO, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-1654, 2022-1691 ______________________ Appeals from the

MEMORANDUM OPINION Glen E. Conrad, Chief United States District Judge ■ Smart Wearable Technologies • Inc. (“Smart Wearable”) filed this action against Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit”) for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,997,882 B1 (“the ’882 Patent”). Smart Wearable asserts claims of direct and indirect infringement. Fitbit has moved to dismiss the claims of indirect infringement under Rule 12(b)(6) of the

ORDER AND REASONS SECTION “N”(2) Flag Section “C” KURT D. ENGELHARDT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Smart Business Technology, Inc. (“SBT”), Serafín Fuente (“Fuente”) and Carlos Romero’s (“Romero”) (SBT, Fuente and Romero are collectively referred to as “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Rec. Doc. 41. Plai

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Megan K. Cavanagh Brian K. Zahra

Case: 22-1815 Document: 67 Page: 1 Filed: 10/24/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NEXSTEP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2022-1815, 2022-2005, 2022-2113 ______________________ Appeals from the

SEITZ, Justice: Replacement lenses used to treat eye cataracts have a limitation-the new lenses focus only at one distance. In most cases, reading glasses are still required after surgery. Elenza, Inc. thought it had a solution to the problem-an electro-active intraocular lens ("EAIOL") that used electric power and changes in eye pupil size to "trigger" the focus of an artificial lens.

OPINION FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge: Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Tetris Holding, LLC and the Tetris Company, LLC (collectively “Tetris Holding” or “Plaintiffs”) claim that Defendant Xio Interactive, Inc. (“Xio” or “Defendant”) has infringed the copyright and trade-dress of Plaintiffs’ video game Tetris. Xio does not raise any issue of fact in re

94 F.Supp.2d 1060 (2000) SMART INVENTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALLIED COMMUNICATIONS CORP., a Florida corporation; International Brands Marketing, Inc., a Florida corporation; International Brand Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. No. CV 00-00780 ABC. United States District Court, C.D. California. March 20, 2000.

Filed 5/20/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SMART CORNER OWNERS D076775 ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017- v. 00037690-CU-CD-CTL) CJUF SMART CORNER LLC et al.,

Filed 3/16/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE QUANTA COMPUTER INC., B280042 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC629858) v. JAPAN COMMUNICATIONS INC., Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from order of the Superior Court o

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SMART LOCAL UNIONS AND COUNCILS ) PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and all ) other similarly situated former stockholders of ) EIDOS THERAPEUTICS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-1030-PAF