Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 11-273C Filed: November 22, 2016 Issued for Publication: January 9, 2017 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * DEXTER SMALL, * * Plaintiff, * v. * * Equal Access to Justice Act, UNIT

Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412; Attorney’s Fees and Reasonable Expenses. OPINION HORN, J. Plaintiff Dexter Small filed an application for attorney’s fees and other expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (2012), in an effort to recover the attorney’s fees and reasonable expenses he incurred while litigating the above-captioned case.

586 F.Supp.2d 417 (2007) Jadrian Brandon SMALL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. C.A. No. 2:07-70741-PMD. Criminal No. 2:05-141. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. December 27, 2007. *419 John C. Duane, U.S. Attorneys Office, Charleston, SC, for Respondent. OR

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

*387Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court. The United States Criminal Code makes it “unlawful for any person . .. who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year . . . to . . . possess . . . any firearm.” 18 U. S. C. § 922(g)(1) (emphasis added).

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari granted.

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.

541 U.S. 958 SMALLv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-750. Supreme Court of United States. March 29, 2004. 1 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted. Reported below: 333 F. 3d 425.

ORDER Floyd Small, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his motion construed as a hybrid 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, and a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion to reduce sentence. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not ne

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari granted.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 158 F. 3d 576 (first judgment); 178 F. 3d 1306 (second judgment).

No opinion found. Click here to view source material.

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KISOR, ATTANASIO, and HARRELL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Stefon M. SMALL Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

OPINION WIESE, Judge. I Introduction Plaintiff is a former major in the Regular Air Force who was twice passed over for promotion in rank to the grade of lieutenant colonel and thereafter was involuntarily separated from the military upon completion of the twenty-year service period required for retirement pay eligibility.1 In this suit, he seeks

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION WIESE, Judge. On July 8, 1996, this court issued an opinion in this military pay case deciding, among other matters, that the Secretary of the Air Force (i) had not violated the “majority” determination requirements of 10 U.S.C. §§ 616(c) and 617(a) in identifying officers eligible for promotion through a panel selection system rather than through a unified

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.