Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Small v. Dothan Security, Inc.”
Christopher Cantu v. City of Dothan, Alabamapublic domain
Case: 18-15071 Date Filed: 09/03/2020 Page: 1 of 39 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-15071 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-01003-ECM-DAB CHRISTOPHER CANTU, as the Admi
Barnes v. City of Dothanpublic domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. I. Introduction This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Nick McElveen’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 21). The underlying dispute has its genesis in Plaintiff Sanjanetta Barnes’s arrest and conviction for disorderly conduct in 2008. This led to Barnes filing a complaint against the City of Do-than, Police Chief Gregory Ben
Madrid v. Homeland Security Solutions Inc.public domain
ORDER W. LOUIS SANDS, Senior Judge Before the Court is Defendant Homeland Security Solutions, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiff Kelli Madrid. (Doc. 44.) For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 19, 2014, Plaintiff filed her Complaint against Def
McCray v. City of Dothanpublic domain
169 F.Supp.2d 1260 (2001) Douglas McCRAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF DOTHAN, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 99-D-55-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. October 2, 2001. *1261 *1262 *1263 *1264<
142 B.R. 465 (1992) In re ALPHA STEEL COMPANY, INC., Debtor. (Two Cases) SOUTHTRUST BANK OF DOTHAN, N.A., Plaintiff, v. ALPHA STEEL COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF DOTHAN, N.A., Appellant, v. ALPHA STEEL COMPANY, INC., et al., Appellees. Civ. A. Nos. 91-T-1127-N, 91-T-1205-N. District Court of United States, M.D. Alabama, N.D. June 18, 1992
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. v. Flowerspublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ■ WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendants Valda Flowers (“Flowers”), Crea*1346tive Risk Underwriters, LLC (“CRU”), and Michael Remeika’s (“Remeika”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment [87]. L BACKGROUND1
in Re: Michelin North America, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01480-CV 05-15-01480-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/4/2015 2:42:24 PM
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. PULLER, Chief Judge. This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Certify Class (Doc. #88), filed January 25, 2008. Named Plaintiffs are two pharmacies that have brought breach of contract claims against Defendants TDI Managed Care Services, Inc. (“TDI”) and Eckerd Health Services (“EHS”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants failed to properly reimbu
BOGGS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. More than twenty years ago, this court determined that the Freedom of Information Act, a federal statute dedicated to open government, requires the release of federal indictees’ booking photographs. The Supreme Court did not correct our reading, and neither did Congress. Nevertheless, today’s majority reverses that determination, citing as justification only a vague privacy int
Linda Batiste v. Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.public domain
FILED 15-0975 12/21/2015 7:10:33 PM tex-8333751 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, C
Hicks v. Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION L. SCOTT COOGLER, District Judge. I. Introduction Before this Court is the fourth in a series of motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc. (“MBUSI”).1 The present motion, filed on September 26, 2011 *1166(Doc. 114), seeks summary
Town of Gurley v. M & N Materials, Inc.public domain
MURDOCK, Justice (concurring in the result in case no. 1110439 and dissenting in case no. 1110507, as substituted on denial of applications for rehearing on September 27, 2013). I concur in the result in case no. 1110439; I dissent in case no. 1110507. I write in reference to the latter case. There are two issues in case no. 1110507: (1) the substantive meaning of the “takings clause” in §
Home Oil Co., Inc. v. Sam's East, Inc.public domain
202 F.Supp.2d 1307 (2002) HOME OIL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. SAM'S EAST, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 01-T-1251-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. May 3, 2002. H. Dean Mooty, Jr., Mooty & Associates, PC, Montgomery, AL, for Home Oil Co., Inc. Steven A. Benefield, Clark A. Cooper, Greer B. Mallette, A. Melissa Boles, Christ
Home Oil Co., Inc. v. Sam's East, Inc.public domain
199 F.Supp.2d 1236 (2002) HOME OIL COMPANY, INC. Plaintiff, v. SAM'S EAST, INC. Defendant. No. CIV.A.01-T-1251-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. April 26, 2002. *1237 *1238 H. Dean Mooty, Jr., Mooty & Associates, PC, Montgomery, AL, for Home Oil Co., Inc.
Allied Williams Companies, Inc. v. Davispublic domain
Allied Williams Companies, Inc., f/k/a Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc., d/b/a Terminix Service ("Terminix"), and Gary Welch, defendants in a proceeding in the Houston Circuit Court, appeal from the trial court's order denying their motion to compel arbitration of the claims of the plaintiffs below, Thomas D. Davis and Grace Davis. We reverse and remand. Facts On October 7, 2000, the Davises executed a real-estate purchase agreement ("the purchas
Fisher v. Comer Plantation, Inc.public domain
772 So.2d 455 (2000) Harry FISHER v. COMER PLANTATION, INC., et al. 1980866. Supreme Court of Alabama. May 19, 2000. *458 Lynn W. Jinks III of Jinks, Jackson, Daniel & Crow, L.L.C., Union Springs; and James E. Williams and Flynn Mozingo of Melton, Espy, Williams & Hayes, P.C., Montgomery, for appellant. Alexander W
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Barnardpublic domain
On Second Application for Rehearing The opinion of January 12, 2001, affirming the trial court's judgment is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. On August 21, 1997, Dr. Henry H. Barnard II sued Delta Air Lines, Inc. ("Delta"), in the District Court of Mobile County, alleging a breach of contract, conversion, theft, negligent supervision, and reckless supervision and/or training. Dr. Barnard sought both compensatory and punitive damages.
Black v. M.G.A., Inc.public domain
51 F.Supp.2d 1315 (1999) Jacqueline BLACK, Plaintiff, v. M.G.A., INC., d/b/a Movie Gallery, Inc., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 98-T-300-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. June 21, 1999. *1316 Jeffrey A. Lee, Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C., Birmingham, AL, Deborah A. Mattison, Charles Michael Quinn, Jill
Digitel Corp. v. DeltaCom, Inc.public domain
953 F.Supp. 1486 (1996) DIGITEL CORPORATION, a Georgia Corp., Plaintiff, v. DELTACOM, INC., an Alabama Corporation, Richard A. Wilkins, John A.R. Smith, and Edward L. Blackwell, Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-D-106-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. November 14, 1996. *1487
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT INTERNATIONAL SPEEDWAY CORPORATION TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT INTERNATIONAL SPEEDWAY CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER SCHELL, District Judge. Before the court are the following written submissions: