Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Skrodzki v. Marcello”
Skrodzki v. Marcellopublic domain
810 F.Supp.2d 501 (2011) Ireneusz SKRODZKI, Plaintiff, v. Walt MARCELLO, Mitchell Crane Service Inc., and Mitchell Companies, LLC, Defendants. No. 10-CV-5191 (ADS)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 19, 2011. *504 Roman Leonov, Esq., New York, NY, for the Plaintiff. POHL LLP, by David M. Pohl, Esq.,
Frank Paterno v. Laser Spine Institutepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Rivera, J. Plaintiff Frank Paterno appeals from the dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction of his medical malpractice action against non-domiciliary defendants Laser Spine Institute (LSI) and various LSI professionals. We conclude that defendants’ contacts with New York are insufficien
Paterno v. Laser Spine Institutepublic domain
(dissenting). The principal questions presented on this appeal are whether the defendants’ contacts with New York established that the defendants purposefully availed themselves of the benefits of New York as the forum state, and whether it would offend notions of fair play and substantial justice for the courts of New York to assert long-arm jurisdiction over the defendants. The majority concludes that the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate that the def
Paterno v. Laser Spine Institutepublic domain
(dissenting). The principal questions presented on this appeal are whether the defendants’ contacts with New York established that the defendants purposefully availed themselves of the benefits of New York as the forum state, and whether it would offend notions of fair play and substantial justice for the courts of New York to assert long-arm jurisdiction over the defendants. The majority concludes that the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate that the def
Jonas v. Estate of Levenpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. This is the story of an international business deal gone wrong. In 2006, Gustave Leven, the founder of the Perrier mineral water empire, and plaintiffs Stanley Jonas and his investment advisory firm Dutch Book Partners, LLC purportedly entered into an oral agreement by which Leven agreed to invest $500 million in a new Cayman Islands based in
Mrs. United States National Pageant, Inc. v. Miss United States of America Organization, LLCpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. The maxim that “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery” may well be true, but in matters of intellectual property, efforts at imitation are not always taken as a compliment, as they often lead to a violation of property rights. The case now before the Court provides an example of just such a situation. This is a trade