Cases

ACCEPTED 13-14-00566-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 2/27/2015 5:28:12 PM DORIAN RAMIREZ

605 A.2d 50 (1992) 4934, INC., d/b/a the Godfather, and Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company, Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent, Kenneth W. Skeen, Intervenor. No. 89-602. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued May 16, 1990. Decided March 24, 1992. *51

JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs in this case, Carlos Zelaya and George Glantz, are victims of one of the largest Ponzi schemes in American history: the much-publicized Ponzi scheme orchestrated by R. Allen Stanford. All Ponzi operations eventually unravel, and when the scheme that had victimized Plaintiffs was publicly revealed to have been a fraud, Plaintiffs were

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN H. KIHM, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0938-MTZ ) DAVID M. MOTT, LEON O. ) MOULDER, DR. MARY LYNNE ) HEDLEY, TIMOTHY R. PEARSON, ) KAV

OPINION HANISEE, Judge. {1} Lyle and Vera Dethlefsen (the Dethlefsens), property owners in Sierra County, brought suit against their neighbors and interested parties, sounding in tort, contract, and declaratory judgment, primarily regarding the use of an easement and corresponding road traversing their land. Following a be

LEHMAN, Justice, dissenting, with whom HILL, Chief Justice, joins. [¶ 9] I must respectfully dissent. Upon consideration of the certified questions, I reach a different conclusion than that reached by the majority. Accordingly, I would hold thát disposable income derived from a debtor’s wages and deposited into the debtor’s bank account are exempt from garnishment under Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-15-408 and 40-14-50'5(b

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Volume I of II No. 02-1619 THAMES SHIPYARD AND REPAIR COMPANY, Plaintiff in Cross Claim, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Appellee. No. 02-1620 NORTHERN VOYAGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; ONEBEA

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on

VALIHURA, Justice: I. INTRODUCTION Pending before this Court is an appeal and cross-appeal arising out of a final judgment of the Court of 'Chancery finding that RBC Capital Markets, LLC (“RBC” or “Appellant”) aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duty by former directors of *823 </

739 P.2d 760 (1987) Rick D. HANCOCK, Appellant (Defendant), v. STOCKMENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 87-3. Supreme Court of Wyoming. July 9, 1987. Robert J. O'Neil, Gillette, for appellant (defendant). James P. Schermetzler, Gillette, for appellee (plaintiff). Before BROWN, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, URBIGKIT and MACY, JJ. <

350 F.3d 247 THAMES SHIPYARD AND REPAIR COMPANY, Plaintiff in Cross Claim, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES, Defendant, Appellee.Northern Voyager Limited Partnership; OneBeacon America Insurance Company f/k/a/ Commercial Union Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, Appellants,v.United States, Defendant, Appellee. No. 02-1619. No. 02-1620. United States Court of Appeal

999 F.Supp. 1 (1998) Stephen M. FLATOW, Plaintiff, v. The ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, the Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei, Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, Ali Fallahian-Khuzestani, and John Does 1-99, Defendants. No. 97-396 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 11, 1998.

OPINION Plaintiffs (appellants) appeal from a final judgment of the district court entered April 25, 1986. Defendants (respondents) cross-appeal from that portion of the judgment denying them attorney fees. Facts This litigation had its origin in the probate of two wills referred to as the Philippine will and the non-Philippine will, both executed on January 23, 1959, by Edward Miller Grimm2 (

867 A.2d 904 (2004) In re ORACLE CORP., Derivative Litigation. C.A. No. 18751. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: September 3, 2004. Decided: November 24, 2004. Revised: December 2, 2004. *905 Robert D. Goldberg, Esquire, Victor Battaglia, Esquire, Biggs & Battaglia, Wilming

107 F.2d 769 (1939) UNITED STATES v. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. No. 4460. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. November 6, 1939. *770 *771 *772 *773 John W. Aiken, Sp. Ass't to Atty. Gen., David W. Robinson, Jr.