Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sizemore v. City of Dallas”
Sizemore v. City of Dallaspublic domain
443 F.Supp.2d 1201 (2006) Raymond SIZEMORE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DALLAS, a municipality, Dallas Police Department, and Chief James Harper, Sergeant John Wallace, and Lieutenant Tom Simpson, individually and in their official capacity, Defendants. Civil No. 04-1114 AS. United States District Court, D. Oregon. August 9, 2006. *1202
Pamela Dallas v. Shelby County Board of Educationpublic domain
08/19/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 20, 2019 Session PAMELA DALLAS v. SHELBY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-16-1736-3 JoeDae L. Jenkins, Chancellor __________________________
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 7, 1999 Session CHARLES DALLAS CAUTHERN, ET AL. v. CITY OF WHITE BLUFF, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Dickson County No. 4820-97 Leonard W. Martin, Judge No. M1998-00991-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 27, 2002 This appeal stems from two l
Wittman v. City of Billingspublic domain
07/05/2022 DA 20-0609 Case Number: DA 20-0609 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2022 MT 129 ARIANE WITTMAN and JEREMY TAYLEN, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF BILL
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00580-CV City of Dallas, Appellant v.
Curtis v. City of Goodingpublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 32) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF JEFF PERRY (Docket No. 36) RONALD E. BUSH, United States Magistrate Judge. Currently pending before the Court are (1) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 32), and (2) Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Portion
Charles Matthews v. Robert Scott, State Commissioner of Education and Dallas Independent School Districtpublic domain
NUMBER 13-06-334-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS <
Mountain Peak Special Utility District v. Public Utility Commission of Texas and the City of Midlothianpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00796-CV Mountain Peak Special Utility District, Appellant v. Public Utility Commission of Texas and The City of Midlothian, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-15-002843, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING
Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Plummerpublic domain
841 S.W.2d 870 (1992) DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Appellant, v. Chauncey PLUMMER and Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1338, Appellees. No. 05-91-00660-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. September 21, 1992. Rehearing Denied October 26, 1992. *871 John T. Hoeft, Ward Allen White, Hyattye O. Simmons, Dallas, for
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00569-CV City of Abilene, Texas; City of San Angelo, Texas
City of Sherman v. Henrypublic domain
*465ABBOTT, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, and GONZALEZ, HECHT, CORNYN, ENOCH and BAKER, Justices, join. The City of Sherman Police Chief denied Patrolman Otis Henry a promotion to the rank of sergeant because Henry was having a sexual affair with the wife of a fellow police offic
City of Plano v. Public Utility Commissionpublic domain
953 S.W.2d 416 (1997) CITY OF PLANO, Texas, Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and MFS Intelenet of Texas, Inc., Appellees. No. 03-96-00691-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. August 14, 1997. *418 Walter Washington, Butler, Porter, Gay & Day, Austin, for appellant. Susan Bergen Schultz, Myra A. McDaniel, Jesus
City of El Paso v. PUC IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING <
City of El Paso v. Public Utility Commissionpublic domain
916 S.W.2d 515 (1995) CITY OF EL PASO, Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS and El Paso Electric Company, Appellees. No. 03-94-00250-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. August 16, 1995. Order Withdrawing Judgment March 13, 1996. *518 Norman J. Gordon, Diamond Rash Gordon & Jackson, P.C., Nanett
City of Somerville v. Public Utility Commissionpublic domain
*559KIDD, Justice. This appeal arises from a suit for judicial review of an order issued by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (the “Commission”) granting Gulf States Utility Company (“Gulf States”) an increase in its retail electric rates. The Cities of Somerville and New Waverly (the “Cities”) and the Office of the Public Utility Counsel (“OPUC”) brought suit in d
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN 444444444444444 NO. 03-05-00565-CV 444444444444444 CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC and Texas Genco, LP, Appellants v. Public Utility Commission of Texas and
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00565-CV CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC and
City of El Paso v. Public Utility Commissionpublic domain
Justice ENOCH delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justices HIGHTOWER, HECHT, and CORNYN join. This is an administrative appeal from an order of the Public Utility Commission (Commission) setting rates to be charged by El Paso Electric Company (EPEC).1 The order was consistent with a non-unanimous stipulation between EPEC an
839 S.W.2d 895 (1992) CITY OF EL PASO, the State of Texas and Office of Public Utility Counsel, Appellants, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, et al., Appellees. No. 3-90-007-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. August 26, 1992. Rehearing Overruled October 14, 1992. *900 Norman J. Gordon, Diamond, Rash, Les
Case Number: 05-91-01941-CV 06/08/1993 Record returned to Court of Appeals 05/05/1993 Application for Writ of Error - Disposed proceeding denied 04/05/1993 Reply filed 04/01/1993 Case forwarded to Court 03/16/1993 Application for Writ of Error - Filed 02/22/1993 Extension of time to file app writ err disposed of Granted 02/22/1993 APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR IS DUE TO BE FILED 02/12/1993 Extension of time to file app writ err filed 02/11/1993 Extension of time to file app writ err filed