⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Sipple v. Meyer”

California Court of Appeal · 2014-04-08 · Published · cited 4× · 225 Cal. App. 4th 349; 170 Cal. Rptr. 3d 199; 2014 WL 1371796; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 313
Opinion BOREN, P. J. For a number of years, individuals throughout California were improperly charged taxes for Internet access by their Internet service provider, New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC (New Cingular), prompting various customers to file putative class action lawsuits. The lawsuits eventually settled, with New Cingular agreeing to seek refunds of the ta
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1993-06-22 · Published · cited 0× · 1 Neb. Ct. App. 893; 510 N.W.2d 450; 1993 Neb. App. LEXIS 291
Irwin, Judge. Appellant, Dan Meyer, filed an action in the district court for Lancaster County pursuant to Nebraska public meeting law, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 84-1408 through 84-1414 (Reissue 1987 & Supp. 1989), challenging the right of appellee, the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska (Board), to undertake a closed-session discussion at a July 31,1989, emergency meeting called for the purpose of “evaluat[ing] and c
California Court of Appeal · 1999-04-07 · Published · cited 121× · 83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 677; 71 Cal. App. 4th 226; 99 Daily Journal DAR 3337; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2602; 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 312; 1999 WL 189672
Opinion NOTT, J. Appellant Donald Sipple appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court dismissed his complaint in favor of respondents Foundation for National Progress, doing business as “Mother Jones,” and Richard Blow (hereinafter sometimes referred to individually, or collectively as respondents). In this appeal we determine whether an article published by Mother Jones was privileged under Civil Code
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1993-06-22 · Published · cited 6× · 510 N.W.2d 450
510 N.W.2d 450 (1993) Dan MEYER, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA, Appellee. No. A-91-942. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. June 22, 1993. *452 Stanford L. Sipple, of DeCamp Legal Services, P.C., Lincoln, for appellant. Fredric H. Kauffman and Terry R. Wittler, of Cline, Williams, Wright, Johnson &
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988-08-23 · Published · cited 4× · 427 N.W.2d 742; 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 809; 1988 WL 86025
427 N.W.2d 742 (1988) ECONOMY FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Respondent, v. Richard Joseph MEYER, et al., Appellants. No. C2-88-549. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. August 23, 1988. Kay Nord Hunt, Ted E. Sullivan, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent. Michael Dady, Charles R. Weaver, Jr., Lindquist & Vennum, Minneapol
Loop v. Muellerpublic domain
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2021-10-26 · Published · cited 1× · 967 N.W.2d 749; 30 Neb. Ct. App. 300
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/02/2021 08:08 AM CDT - 300 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 30 Nebraska Appellate Reports LOOP v. MUELLER Cite as 30 Neb. App. 300 Margo Loop, as Guardian and Conservator of
State v. Fusbypublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972-03-10 · Published · cited 1× · 195 N.W.2d 495; 188 Neb. 139; 1972 Neb. LEXIS 762
195 N.W.2d 495 (1972) 188 Neb. 139 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Rex L. FUSBY, Appellant. No. 38199. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 10, 1972. *496 Mark M. Sipple, Columbus, for appellant. Clarence A. H. Meyer, Atty. Gen., Gerald S. Vitamvas, Deputy Atty. Gen., Lincoln, for appellee. Heard
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-08-18 · Published · cited 19× · 9 F.4th 839
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2474 ___________________________ Ascente Business Consulting, LLC, doing business as LIBERTYID Plaintiff - Appellant v. DR myCommerce, doing business as eSellerate; Digital River,
State v. Wolfepublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-03-14 · Published · cited 4× · 2025 Ohio 866
[Cite as State v. Wolfe, 2025-Ohio-866.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 29759 : v.
Superior Court of Delaware · 2018-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 197 A.3d 493
Jurden, P.J. I. INTRODUCTION This dispute arises from Defendant, Jive Communication, Inc.'s ("Jive"),1 purchase of a business from Plaintiff, KnighTek, LLC ("KnighTek"),2 and a related entity. Following the purchase, KnighTek sued Jive for rescission based on fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment. Jive suggests this is a case
California Court of Appeal · 2019-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 12/18/19; Opinion following transfer from Supreme Court CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT FREDERICK THEODORE B284566 RALL III, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BC613703) v. TRIBUNE 365, LLC, et al.,
California Court of Appeal · 2019-01-17 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/17/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT FREDERICK THEODORE B284566 RALL III, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BC613703) v. TRIBUNE 365 LLC et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles Cou
California Court of Appeal · 2017-01-11 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/10/17 Unmodified opinion attached IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE HEALTHSMART PACIFIC, INC., B264300 et al., (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC566549) Plaintiffs and Appellants, ORDER MO
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2019-01-17 · Published · cited 2× · 242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 633; 31 Cal. App. 5th 479
GRIMES, J. *483SUMMARY Plaintiff Frederick Theodore Rall III, a political cartoonist and blogger, sued Los Angeles Times Communications LLC (The Times) after it published a "note to readers" and a later more detailed report questioning the accuracy of a blog post plaintiff wrote for The Times. The Times told it
California Court of Appeal · 2016-12-19 · Published · cited 31× · 7 Cal. App. 5th 416; 212 Cal. Rptr. 3d 589; 82 Cal. Comp. Cases 20; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1162
Opinion ROTHSCHILD, P. J. Plaintiffs Michael D. Drobot and Healthsmart Pacific, Inc., sued certain lawyers and their law firms for defamation and other causes of action arising from statements two of the lawyers made on television and radio programs about a pending lawsuit. The attorney defendants filed a special motion to strike the complaint as a strategic
Chavez v. Mendozapublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2001-12-24 · Published · cited 0× · 94 Cal. App. 4th 1083; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10642; 114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 825; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 13218; 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 3669
Opinion HALLER, J. In the published portion of this opinion, we hold plaintiffs’ malicious prosecution cause of action was subject to a special motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.) In the unpublished portion of the opinion, we conclude plaintiffs met their burden to establish a probability they would prevail on thei
Chavez v. Mendozapublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2001-12-24 · Published · cited 99× · 114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 825; 94 Cal. App. 4th 1083
114 Cal.Rptr.2d 825 (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 1083 Richard A. CHAVEZ et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Enriqueta MENDOZA et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. D037586. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. December 24, 2001. Rehearing Denied January 9, 2002. *827 Higgs, Fletche
Kizer v. Harperpublic domain
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001-11-30 · Published · cited 6× · 561 S.E.2d 368; 211 W. Va. 47
561 S.E.2d 368 (2001) 211 W.Va. 47 James D. KIZER and Joyce Kizer, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. Charles HARPER, Defendant Below, Appellant. No. 29694. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted October 3, 2001. Decided November 28, 2001. Dissenting Opinion of Justice Davis November 30, 2001.
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2010-04-29 · Published · cited 286× · 782 N.W.2d 298; 279 Neb. 773
782 N.W.2d 298 (2010) 279 Neb. 773 Rodney M. WETOVICK, Nance County Attorney, appellee and cross-appellant, v. The COUNTY OF NANCE, a body politic and corporate, et al., appellants and cross-appellees. No. S-08-1302. Supreme Court of Nebraska. April 29, 2010. *304 George E. Martin III and Aimee C. Bataillo
Divane v. Smithpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002-06-18 · Published · cited 9× · 774 N.E.2d 361; 332 Ill. App. 3d 548; 266 Ill. Dec. 255
774 N.E.2d 361 (2002) 332 Ill. App.3d 548 266 Ill.Dec. 255 William T. DIVANE, Jr., Michael J. Caddigan, I. Steven Diamond, Samuel Evans, Michael Fitzgerald, Thomas C. Halperin, David A. Hardt, Daniel, Meyer, Richard Sipple, and Michael R. Walsdorf, as the Electrical Insurance Trustees, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Dale W. SMITH, d/b/a Dover Distributing Co./Dover Telecommunications Co., Friedler Constr