Cases

ORDER Per Curiam: Mr. Damon Simpson appeals the motion court’s judgment denying a Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to permit him to testify at trial. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Rosen, J., concurring: I concur with the majority opinion. I write separately to emphasize my belief that the district court was empowered to take the measures employed here to ensure that a valid, enforceable court order was complied with. While the dissent raises some compelling concerns regarding the continued validity of Gregg evaluations, that question is not before us. See State v. Gr

Sup. Ct. Kan. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 259 Kan. 781, 915 P. 2d 109.

255 P.3d 1228 (2011) STATE v. SIMPSON. No. 103237. Court of Appeals of Kansas. July 22, 2011. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

260 P.3d 1248 (2011) STATE v. SIMPSON. No. 105182. Court of Appeals of Kansas. September 30, 2011. Decision Without Published Opinion Reversed and remanded with directions.

342 S.W.3d 923 (2011) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Damon SIMPSON, Appellant. No. WD 72056. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. June 28, 2011. Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Befo

233 P.3d 744 (2010) STATE v. SIMPSON. Nos. 101539, 101540, 101541. Supreme Court of Kansas. July 9, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Dismissed.

315 S.W.3d 779 (2010) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony D. SIMPSON, Appellant. No. WD 70208. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. July 27, 2010. *780 Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang and Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before Divisio

SHEPHERD, Circuit judge; Cheryl. Simpson brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the County of Cape Girardeau, Missouri (“Cape Girardeau”), alleging that the Cape Girardeau County Jail’s postcard-only incoming-mail policy for non-privileged mail violated her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by im-permissibly-restricting her ability to communicate wi

175 P.3d 281 (2008) STATE v. SIMPSON. No. 97368. Court of Appeals of Kansas. February 1, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. This appeal involves a criminal defendant’s obligation to pay restitution to the victims. A restitution payment schedule can be modified when the defendant’s economic circumstances materially change. Here the criminal defendant obtained a cash settlement growing out of a tort action against the federal government. With this settlement, the district cour

*804 ORDER PER CURIAM. Michael Simpson appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

ORDER Michael Simpson appeals his convictions for Murder in the Second Degree and Armed Criminal Action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only

29 Kan. App.2d 862 (2001) 32 P.3d 1226 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. KAPELLE D. SIMPSON, Appellant. No. 85,497. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed October 5, 2001. *863 Richard Ney, of Law Offices of Richard Ney, of Wichita, for appellant. Lesley A. McFadden, Debra S. Peterson,

PlERRON, J: Glenn E. Simpson appeals his sentence for one count of attempted voluntary manslaughter. Pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3405, Simpson argues the district court violated his right to be present at sentencing. Simpson pled guilty to attempted voluntary manslaughter, a crime severity level 5 felony. He was sentenced to a presumptive sentence of 32 months’ incarceration. The district court also pronounced a po

Sup. Ct. Kan. Cer-tiorari denied.

PARRISH, Judge. Donald R. Simpson (defendant) was convicted, following a jury trial, of murder in the first degree. § 565.020.1 He was sentenced to life imprisonment without eligibility for probation or parole. Defendant thereafter filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. It was denied following an evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals the judgment of

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. SIMPSON NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

836 S.W.2d 75 (1992) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stacy Mechelle SIMPSON, Appellant. No. 15001. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. July 14, 1992. *76 Curtis E. Woods, of Spencer, Fane, Britt & Browne, Kansas City, for appellant. William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Ronald L. Jurgeson, Asst. Att

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. Petitioners Howard Scott Simpson, Roy L. Jensen, and John G. Hallock appeal the district court’s order denying their petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioners argue their prosecutions for possession of marijuana, following the State of Kansas’ imposition of a penalty for failure to pay a drug tax pursuant