Cases

*520 MEMORANDUM OPINION Charles R. Simpson III, Senior Judge, United States District Court This matter is before the Court on two motions of Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Portfolio”). First, Portfolio moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), arguing that this a

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

ACCEPTED 01-14-00904-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) KENNETH CARR, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) and derivatively on behalf of nominal ) defendant ADVANCED CARDIAC ) THERAPEUTICS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0381-

MEMORANDUM OPINION . LETITIA Z. PAUL, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The court has held a joint trial on the above captioned adversary proceeding, and *402in the instant Chapter 11 case, the “Amended Motion for (I) Allowance of Secured Claim and Reasonable Fees, Costs, and Charges Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016 and (ii) E

Filed 4/2/20 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Placer) ---- ROBERT WEIMER, JR., C080550 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. SCV0035286) v. NATIONSTAR MO

Opinion MANELLA, J. In the underlying action, appellant Sharmalee Goonewardene’s fifth amended complaint asserted claims against respondents ADP, LLC, ADP Payroll Services, Inc., and AD Processing, LLC, for wrongful termination, violations of the Labor Code, and related causes of action, including breach of contra

HON. JORGE ALONSO, United States District Judge *870MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Scott McMahon, brings this case under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1692

ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JONATHAN URDAN and WILLIAM ) WOODWARD, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0343-JTL ) WR CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware ) limited liability company, WR E3 HOLDINGS, ) LLC, a Dela

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on

ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C. (the “Firm”) is a self-proclaimed creditors’ rights law firm. According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “Bureau”), from 2009 through 2013; the Firm’s small group of lawyers filed tens of thousands of lawsuits in Georgia each year to recover on allegedly defaulted debt. The Bureau alleges, however, th

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN Z. LEE, United States District Judge Betty Holcomb has sued the law firm of Freedman Anselmo Lindberg, LLC (“Freedman”), alleging a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692c(a)(2). In short, Holcomb alleges that Freedman violated the FDCPA by mailing court filings to her directly when Freedman knew that she was represented by coun

Sykes, Circuit Judge. *991 When Betty Holcomb ran up a credit-card bill and did not pay, the creditor hired the law firm of Freedman Anselmo Lindberg, LLC ("Freedman"), to collect it. Freedman sued Holcomb on the creditor's behalf in Illinois state court. Holcomb initially appeared pro se bu

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON This appeal presents a challenge to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission’s *1082(PUC) imposition of a civil penalty of approximately $1.8 million against an electric generation supplier1 (EGS) which, during the polar vortex2 effects of the winter of 2014, inten

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE MOTIONS OF THE FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND UNDERWRITER DEFENDANTS TO COMPEL DOCUMENT DISCOVERY FROM THE DEBTORS MARTIN GLENN, Bankruptcy Judge. “For more than three centuries it has now been recognized as a fundamental maxim that the public ... has a right to every man’s evidence.” Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 9, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.E

A IN CLERK* OFFICE This opinion was fUFRBE COURT.SIXrE OF WKSHMOraM filed for record JAN t 6 2025- ai^tLM.on 3^ao Susan L. Carlson Supreme Court Clerk

Crescent Univ. City Venture, LLC v. AP Atl., Inc., 2019 NCBC 46. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 15 CVS 14745 (Master File) CRESCENT UNIVERSITY CITY VENTURE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AP ATLANTIC, INC. d/b/a ADOLFSON & PETERSON CONSTRUCTION, Defendant, v. MADISON CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.; TRUSSWAY MANUFACTURIN

OPINION ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS MICHAEL E. WILES, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Stillwater Liquidating LLC claims that the “Stillwater Funds” were defrauded in 2010 when their assets were transferred to the Gerova group of companies and then, a few months later, to the Net Five group of companies. Stillwater Liquidating seeks to recover the properties or their values. Some defendants are persons and entitie