Cases

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: Appellant Stephen Simon appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil suit against approximately 1,600 defendants in the health insurance industry. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we AFFIRM. I. When filing this appeal, Simon requested initial en banc hearing pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The judges of th

39 F.Supp.2d 1216 (1999) Inno EKEH, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. No. C 98-0247 FMS(BZ). United States District Court, N.D. California. January 29, 1999. *1217 Ronald J. Souza, Joseph D. Miller, Schachter Kristoff Orenstein & Berkowitz, San Francisco, CA, Wesley M. Lowe, E. Gerald Mannion, Mannion &

57 F.3d 1077NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Esperanza OLIVAS, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant,v.ITT HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY,Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.

208 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2000) STEPHEN SIMON, an individual and as assignee of assignors, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.VALUE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA; VALUE HEALTH, INC.; ROBERT E. PATRICELLI, LTD.; AMERICAN PSYCHMANAGEMENT, INC; PREFERRED HEALTHCARE, LTD; HEALTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.; THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY; HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC.; HEALTH RISK MANAGEMENT, HEALTH INSURANCE ASSOC

AHRENS, Presiding Judge. This is an appeal by the third-party plaintiff Contico International, Inc. (“Contico”) from a summary judgment granted in favor of third-party defendant Alexander & Alexander, Inc. (“A & A”). A & A cross-appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (“Hartford”) on A & A’s indemnity cross-claim. We reverse and remand. The fo

POTTERFIELD, Judge. David Erickson appeals from the judgment entered against him for tortious interference with a contract after a trial to the court. Erickson challenges some of the district court's evidentiary rulings and the court's determination that he intentionally interfered with the contract between plaintiff G-Force Hauling, L.L.C. (G-Force) and Menards, Inc. Erickson also argu

CHÁVEZ, Justice, dissenting. {74} It is undisputed that Allstate obtained the Durhams’ offer to dismiss Guest from the lawsuit with prejudice, without her having to contribute a single penny, and without compromising whatever claim(s) Guest believed she had against the Durhams and their attorneys. Having secured this promise, there simply was nothing more for Allstate to def

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge DAVIS and Judge WYNN joined. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: The Commonwealth of Virginia (“Virginia”) brings this action against Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary”). Virginia challenges one provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as an u

822 F.Supp.2d 390 (2011) Martin LEVION, Plaintiff, v. SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE, Defendant. No. 09 Civ. 5800 (RJS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 30, 2011. *392 Ariel Purnell Cannon, Thomas Dewey, Chi-Ru Jou, and Keara Bergin of Dewey, Pegno & Kramarsky, LLP, New York, N.Y., for Plaintiff. Jade Burns, K

759 F.Supp.2d 632 (2010) Tracey L. HAMPTON, Plaintiff, v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-327. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. December 13, 2010. *634 Fred G. Rabner, Rabner Law Offices, Monte J. Rabner, Scott M. Simon, Rabner Law Offices, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff. J

268 Kan. 359 (2000) 2 P.3d 758 DONALD A. LANDRY, Claimant/Appellant, v. GRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY, INC., d/b/a GTI, Respondent/Appellee, and ITT HARTFORD INSURANCE, Insurance. Carrier/Appellee. No. 80,087. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed January 28, 2000. Brad I. Pearson, of DeSimone Pearson, L.C., of Overland Park, argued the caus

581 S.E.2d 778 (2003) Angela WHITFIELD, Employee, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Employer, Hartford-ITT Specialty Risk Services, Carrier, Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees. No. COA02-722. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 17, 2003. *780 Edelstein & Payne by M.

777 F.Supp.2d 1160 (2011) Jennifer Leigh HOLT, Individually and as Parent of J.S.H., a minor, Plaintiff, v. QUALITY EGG, L.L.C., d/b/a "Wright County Egg," an Iowa limited liability company, Defendant. Daniel and Libby Sands, Individually and as Parents of A.S., a minor, Plaintiffs, v. Quality Egg, L.L.C., d/b/a "Wright County Egg," an Iowa limited liability company, Defendant. Sarah Lewis, Plaintiff, v. Quality Egg, L.L.C

767 N.E.2d 936 (2002) 328 Ill. App.3d 1028 263 Ill.Dec. 210 NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nathaniel S. SHAPO, Director of the Illinois Department of Insurance; Robert Enoex, Chief Counsel of the Illinois Department of Insurance; and The Illinois Department of Insurance, Defendants-Appellees (Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nat

930 So.2d 643 (2006) Karem Elena ROMO, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Magali Romo, Appellant, v. AMEDEX INSURANCE COMPANY, Cincinnati Equitable Insurance Company, and Fernando Nava d/b/a F. Nava & Company, Appellees. No. 3D05-1400. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 22, 2006. Rehearing Denied June 27,

SMITH, Circuit Judge. National Liability & Fire Insurance Company (“National”) appeals a judgment entered against it in a garnishment action. David Edgley filed an underlying action to recover damages for personal injuries he received in an accident involving an employee of National’s insureds, Benita and Harold Lappe, who owned and operated a taxicab company. National did not

585 F.3d 334 (2009) Joseph KAMELGARD, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Jerzy MACURA, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 08-4254, 09-1030. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 15, 2009. Decided October 23, 2009. *335 Miles J. Zaremski, Attorney (argued), Zaremski Law Group,

Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ALLAN L. GROPPER, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Introduction Debtor Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) has moved to assign a ground lease that it previously assumed on August 15, 2012 (the “Motion”). The lease has a prohibition against assignment without the consent of the lessor, and the lessor, ITT Space S

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 08-4254, 09-1030 JOSEPH K AMELGARD , Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. JERZY M ACURA , Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 08 C 03211—Suzanne B

427 F.Supp.2d 1117 (2006) David J. SPARKMAN, Plaintiff, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. 1:04-CV-00138PGC. United States District Court, D. Utah. Northern Division. January 25, 2006. *1118 Randall R. Smart, Jeffrey A. Canister, Smart Schofield Shorter & Lunceford, Murray, UT, David K. Lauritzen,