⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Simon Transportation Services Inc.”

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2003-04-25 · Published · cited 6× · 292 B.R. 207; 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 394; 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 76; 2003 WL 1989699
292 B.R. 207 (2003) In re SIMON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., Dick Simon Trucking, Inc., and Simon Terminal, LLC, Debtors. No. 02-22906. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah. April 25, 2003. *208 *209 L. Mark Ferre, Weston L. Harris, Parsons Davies Kinghorn & Peters, Salt Lake City, UT, Mark A
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-06-02 · Published · cited 8× · 329 F.3d 946; 2003 A.M.C. 1533; 62 Fed. R. Serv. 636; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10833; 2003 WL 21251982
RILEY, Circuit Judge. American River Transportation Company, Inc. (ARTCO) instituted the present action against Paragon Marine Services, Inc. (Paragon) and Consolidated Grain and Barge Co. (CGB) (collectively appellants) after a barge, the ING 5565, broke away from a fleet of barges operated by Paragon and CGB. The ING 5565 drifted downstream and collided with other barge fleets,
District Court, D. Oregon · 2017-05-23 · Published · cited 3× · 253 F. Supp. 3d 1115; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78164
OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiffs Helicopter Transport Services, LLC (“HTS”) and U.S. Leaseco, Inc. (“Leaseco”) bring this action against Defendant Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (“Sikorsky”), alleging breach of contract and breach of the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000-03-17 · Published · cited 105× · 208 F.3d 1073; 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1208; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2120; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 2905; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 4101; 2000 WL 282655
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: Appellant Stephen Simon appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil suit against approximately 1,600 defendants in the health insurance industry. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we AFFIRM. I. When filing this appeal, Simon requested initial en banc hearing pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The judges of th
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000-03-17 · Published · cited 48× · 208 F.3d 1073
208 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2000) STEPHEN SIMON, an individual and as assignee of assignors, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.VALUE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA; VALUE HEALTH, INC.; ROBERT E. PATRICELLI, LTD.; AMERICAN PSYCHMANAGEMENT, INC; PREFERRED HEALTHCARE, LTD; HEALTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.; THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY; HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC.; HEALTH RISK MANAGEMENT, HEALTH INSURANCE ASSOC
District Court, D. Utah · 2000-09-27 · Published · cited 9× · 112 F. Supp. 2d 1251; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14456; 2000 WL 1455296
112 F.Supp.2d 1251 (2000) Jeff T. CAPRIN and Michele A. Caprin, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SIMON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, et al., Defendants. No. 2:98-CV-863K. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. September 27, 2000. *1252 *1253 C. Richard Henriksen, Jr., Henriksen & Henrik
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995-10-16 · Published · cited 265× · 68 F.3d 694
68 F.3d 694 69 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 81, 67 Empl.Prac. Dec. P 43,758Simon A. BARBER, Appellant No. 94-3604,v.CSX DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, a Unit of CSX Transportation,Inc.; CSX Transportation, Inc., Appellants No. 94-3653. Nos. 94-3604, 94-3653. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued July 28, 1995.Decided Oct. 16, 1995.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995-11-15 · Published · cited 1× · 68 F.3d 1315; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31996; 1995 WL 638463
PER CURIAM: Appellant Zuki Teria is a Panamanian Corporation, which owned the M/V INAGUA TANIA. Appellee Isbrandtsen Marine Services, Inc. (“IMS”) provided bunkers and lube oil to the vessel on the order of the vessel’s charterers, Inagua Lines and Sea Road Shipping. IMS thereby held a maritime lien against the vessel. Zuki Teria also contracted directly with IMS to provide bunkers and
Simon v. Simonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013-12-03 · Published · cited 1× · 231 N.C. App. 76; 753 S.E.2d 475; 2013 WL 6236438; 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 1227
ELMORE, Judge. Joanne C. Simon (plaintiff) asserts that the trial court erred in 1) failing to properly classify property, 2) valuing certain marital and divisible marital property, and 3) declining to award her attorney’s fees and *78additional costs. Portions of the trial court’s order are vacated, and this matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings
District Court, N.D. California · 2014-09-23 · Published · cited 0× · 69 F. Supp. 3d 940; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134104; 2014 WL 4744512
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The five remaining Defendants in this antitrust suit — Air New Zealand, All *946Nippon Airways (“ANA”), China Airlines, EVA Air, and Philippine Airlines — move for summary judgment on the basis of the filed rate doctri
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015-07-01 · Published · cited 50× · 467 S.W.3d 413; 2015 Tenn. LEXIS 547; 2015 WL 3991141
OPINION Gary R. Wade, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Sharon G. Lee, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Jeffrey S. Bivins, and Holly Kirby, JJ., joined. A railroad employee who was diagnosed with lung cancer filed suit against the railroad under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, alleging tha
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-05-29 · Published · cited 0× · 393 S.W.3d 687; 2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 342; 2012 WL 1925554
OPINION HERSCHEL PICKENS FRANKS, P.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., and D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J., joined. Deceased, a resident of Iowa, an employee of plaintiff, delivered materials to the State of Tennessee, and while the materials were being unloaded sustained i
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013-10-07 · Published · cited 106× · 732 F.3d 259; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20403; 2013 WL 5508868
OPINION ROSENTHAL, District Judge: This appeal arises out of the intersection of the Bankruptcy Code and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The issue is whether a debt collector’s letter and notice requesting an examination under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 and offering to settle a debt, sent in a pending bankruptcy in contemplation of an
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010-07-02 · Published · cited 0× · 736 F. Supp. 2d 1311; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98214; 2010 WL 3542017
736 F.Supp.2d 1311 (2010) CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON a/s/o MA Laboratories, Inc., Plaintiff, v. BE LOGISTICS, INC., and Cargo Transportation Services, Inc., Defendants. Case No.: 10-20418-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. July 2, 2010. *1313 Mitchell Leslie Shadowitz, Shadowitz Associates, Boca Raton, f
District Court, D. Oregon · 2015-11-05 · Published · cited 0× · 143 F. Supp. 3d 1072; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150281; 2015 WL 6773757
OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiff (“Hosick”) brings a claim for unpaid minimum wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 206, and a claim for unpaid wages, compensation, and related penalties and damages under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapters 652 and 653. Hosick alleges that Defendant Catalyst IT Services, Inc. (“Catalyst”) hired her in March 2012 and re
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007-12-20 · Published · cited 9× · 173 P.3d 1031; 217 Ariz. 330; 519 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 18; 2007 Ariz. App. LEXIS 235
173 P.3d 1031 (2007) Steven H. SIMON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SAFEWAY, INC., Defendant/Appellee. No. 2 CA-CV 2007-0055. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B. December 20, 2007. *1032 Steven H. Simon, Tucson, In Propria Persona. Quarles & Brady LLP By Timothy M. Medcoff and Deanna R. Rader, Tucson, Atto
Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2005-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 47 V.I. 130; 2005 V.I. LEXIS 12
HOLLAR, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (July 28, 2005) Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claim for Punitive Damages with Memorandum of Law contending that punitive damages are not attainable under Puerto Rico law, which governs since the accident occurred off the rocks and reefs of Puerto Rico. Plaintiffs have filed their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
Nevada Supreme Court · 2022-09-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA EDGEWORTH FAMILY TRUST; AND No. 83258 AMERICAN GRATING, LLC, Appellants, vs. FILED DANIEL S. SIMON; AND THE LAW SEP 1 6 2022 OFFICE OF DANIEL S. SIMON, A
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013-02-21 · Published · cited 0× · 110 So. 3d 1168; 12 La.App. 5 Cir. 588; 2013 WL 646427; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 281
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. 12AppelIant has appealed a trial court judgment awarding penalties and attorney’s fees against it in this workers’ compensation proceeding. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the portion of the judgment under review granting attorney’s fees, vacate the portion of the judgment setting the attorney’s fees at $4,000.00, and remand the matter for a determination of reasonable attorney’s fees.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-06-04 · Published · cited 9× · 184 A.D.3d 927; 123 N.Y.S.3d 554; 2020 NY Slip Op 3161
Matter of Simon v Mehadrin Prime (2020 NY Slip Op 03161) Matter of Simon v Mehadrin Prime 2020 NY Slip Op 03161 Decided on June 4, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure