Cases

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2015 MSPB 37 Docket No. NY-3443-14-0380-I-1 Ilan Fouks, Appellant, v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge: Michael Fitzgerald appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Title VII suit for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We affirm. I Plaintiff-Appellant Michael Fitzgerald, a black male, was employed as a pharmacy technician at a Department of Veterans Affairs (the “VA”) medical center in Shreveport, Lo

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Fred Corley appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), on his claims for disability discrimination under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791, and for constructive discharge. He alleges that he has a physical impairment — a seizu

Opinion by Judge GRABER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge PREGERSON GRABER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, the Estate of Dorothy Martin and Mary Martin, Dorothy’s daughter, claim that Defendants the California Department of Veterans Affairs (“Department”) and its officers and administrators illegally denied Dorothy Martin admission to the Veterans’ Home of California (“Home”) because of a d

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Dependant Veterans Affairs Medical Center’s SECOND Motion to Dismiss RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Charles Johnson,' Jr., has brought this action seeking damages from Defendant Veterans Affairs Medical Center and four unknown ind

ORDER PER CURIAM. The court has received a certified copy of the judgment from the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States in Shinseki v. Sanders, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1696, 173 L.Ed.2d 532 (2009). Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The mandate issued on October 31, 2007, is hereby recalled and the appe

ORDER PER CURIAM. The court has received a certified copy of the judgment from the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States in Shinseki v. Sanders, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1696, 173 L.Ed.2d 532 (2009). Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The mandate issued on October 31, 2007, is hereby recalled and the appe

PROST, Circuit Judge. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs appeals a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) that vacated and remanded a decision by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”) denying Patricia D. Simmons’s claim for service connection for hearing loss in her right ear and for an increased rating for hearing loss in her left

Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court. In these two civil cases, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denied veterans’ claims for disability benefits. In both cases the VA erroneously failed to provide the veteran with a certain kind of statutorily required notice. See 38 U. S. C. § 5103(a). In both cases the VA argued that the error was harmles

712 P.2d 103 (1985) 300 Or. 441 ASSOCIATED OREGON VETERANS, an Unincorporated Association, David Munz and Terry L. and Debra S. Harrison, Husband and Wife, On Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Appellant. CC 85-2710; CA A38080; SC S32379. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Subm

Case: 19-1519 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 07/17/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RICHARD D. SIMMONS, Claimant-Appellant v. ROBERT WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2019-1519 ______________________ Appea

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. Michelle Johnson sued her former employer, the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging that her supervisor, Karl Williams, sexually harassed her and that the VA retaliated against her for challenging the harassment. Following a bench trial, the district court held that Johnson had been subject

766 P.2d 386 (1988) 94 Or.App. 314 State of Oregon, Acting by and through the DIRECTOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, v. Rita Helen PETERSEN, Respondent, Francis R. Petersen, United States of America Internal Revenue Service, State of Oregon Department of Revenue, Charles N. Isaak and Robert H. McSweeney, Defendants, and Roy Newman, Appellant. 82-1634-C; CA A43977. Cou

370 S.C. 109 (2006) 634 S.E.2d 1 Essie SIMMONS, Respondent, v. Rubin SIMMONS, Appellant. No. 4043. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Submitted October 1, 2005. Decided November 14, 2005. Withdrawn, Substituted, and Refiled April 10, 2006. Rehearing Denied April 10, 2006.

RADER, Circuit Judge. Frank L. Tetro, III, appeals the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, Vet-App. No. 97-1192 (Sept. 6, 2000), affirming the March 1997 decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board). In its March 1997 decision, the Board declined to grant Mr. Tetro an effective date for his non-service-connected pension benefits earlier th

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 16-3039 RICHARD D. SIMMONS, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued April 25, 2018

NEWMAN, J. Appellant (purchaser) appeals an order that required that the sheriff of Washington County issue to Petersen (mortgagor) a certificate of redemption for real property that purchaser bought at a mortgage foreclosure sale on March 26, 1986, if mortgagor were to tender the redemption amount less than one year after the sale.1 We reverse. Mortgagor gave a mortgage on the p

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALFRITA SIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. No. 25-cv-437 (TSC) DOUG COLLINS, et al., Defendants. OPINION & ORDER In this Title VII case, Plaintiff Alfrita Simmons alleges that she was “physically assaulted by [a] co-worker” and “subj

771 F.Supp.2d 908 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Verdell SIMMONS. No. 10 CR 763. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 22, 2011. *912 Dylan Smith, United States Attorney's Office, N.D. Illinois, Chicago, IL, AUSA, United States Attorney's Office, Chicago, IL, Pretrial Services, for United State

564 F.Supp.2d 515 (2008) Oscar SIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant No. 4:06-CV-212-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division. May 15, 2008. *517 David J. Ward, The Ward Law Firm, Raleigh, NC, Diane Baysinger, Cary, NC, for Plaintiff. Stephen A. Dunn, James