Cases

229 So.2d 700 (1969) 255 La. 60 STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond Eugene CRUM et al. No. 49880. Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 10, 1969. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., William P. Schuler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jim Garrison Dist. Atty., Louise Korns, David G. Perlis, Asst. Dist. Attys., for relator. John R. Simmons, Jr., New Orleans,

PER CURIAM. Appellees were low bidders on a federal construction project. Their bid was rejected because of a defective and deficient “bid-bond” issued by appellant bonding company through its agent, appellant Pollock. Appellees recovered judgment in the court below for loss of profits suffered on account of the wrongful acts of the appellants in furnishing the aforesaid insufficient bond, and the trial court awarded interes

265 N.J. Super. 230 (1993) 626 A.2d 81 J. JOSEPHSON, INC., PLAINTIFF, v. CRUM & FORSTER INS. CO., FIREMAN'S FUND INS. CO., HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY CO., PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INS. CO., AND ZURICH-AMERICAN INS. CO., DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County. Decided: April 16, 1993.

This appeal involves a property dispute in an action brought by the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church ("AME Zion Church") against the congregation of Simmons Chapel Church, which is located in Macon County. The trial court granted Simmons Chapel's motion to dismiss and determined that Simmons Chapel owned the property on which the church building was located. We issued a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Civil Appeals' affirmance, without an opinion, of the trial court's

246 N.J. Super. 503 (1990) 588 A.2d 385 HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CRUM & FORSTER PERSONAL INSURANCE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted November 21, 1990. Decided December 19, 1990. *504 Before Judges GAULKIN and HAVEY.

Henley, C. J. This was an action by appellant against appellees upon a promissory note. Appellee Crum was principal and appellee IVIotz surety on the note sued on. Motz answered separately averring the fact that he was a surety on said note and received no part of the consideration on account of his signing the same, all of which facts appellant well knew. That without the knowledge or consent of this appellee, appellant extended

Simmons, C. J. The city council of Cordele passed an ordinance which provided: “It shall be unlawful for hogs to run at large upon the streets and sidewalks of the City of Cordele, the same being declared a nuisance. All hogs found at large upon the streets and sidewalks of said city . . shall be impounded by the marshal or policeman in a suitable pound, and, when so impounded, shall be advertised at the post-office and council

121 Ill. App.3d 743 (1984) 460 N.E.2d 28 EDWARD SIMMONS, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant (Sachs Electric Company, Third-Party Defendant and Counterplaintiff-Appellee). No. 83-197. Illinois Appellate Court — Fifth District. Opinion filed January 10, 1984. Re

Coffey, C. J. David Taylor died intestate in Wells county in the year 1882, seized in fee of certain land upon which one McKee held a mortgage to secure the sum of eight hundred dollars, which was the only lien thereon. The appellant was duly appointed administrator of Taylor’s estate, and the personal assets being insufficient to pay the debts, he filed a petition alleging that fact, and asking that the widow’s interest in the l

356 F.Supp. 1054 (1973) Mrs. Juanita H. CRUM, Plaintiff, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. GC 72-51. United States District Court, N. D. Mississippi, Greenville Division. March 28, 1973. *1055 James T. Bridges, Irby Turnel, Jr., Belzoni, Miss., for plaintiff. John E. Hughes, III, Erskine W. Wel

PER CURIAM. The defendant was convicted of the crimes of robbery and assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree by the trial court. The defendant was charged by information with robbery and assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree. He pleaded not guilty and waived jury trial. The trial judge found the defendant guilty on both counts and sentenced him to terms of twenty and te

This action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by plaintiff in error wherein he seeks to have defendant in error, as court clerk of Tulsa county, enjoined from paying any part of the district judges' salaries out of the court fund of said county, under the provisions of article 8, ch. 20, S. L. 1936-37, title 71, § 251b, Okla. St. Ann. Section 1 of said act provides: "In each district court judicial district of this state having a population in excess of 200,000,

In September, 1914, appellee resided on lot No. 3, block 12, in the old town of Santa Anna, and while occupying the same as his home, together with his family, appellant erected near said premises, and immediately south thereof, a cotton gin, which it is claimed by appellee was so operated during said season as to become a nuisance, and this action is brought to recover damages therefor. Answering, appellant specifically denied many of the allegations of appellee's petition, and as to others

Whitfield, J., delivered the opinion of the court. In Lang v. Simmons, 64 Wisconsin, 529, it was held that money due upon a contract with a wood factory, for sawing lumber belonging to assignors, was not “wages.” The court say: “They were not persons hired by the assignors to do manual labor for them, nor were they hired persons within the ordinary sense of the words hired persons. They were manufactur

Eish, P. J. Under the provisions of the act approved August 17, 1903 (Acts 1903, p. 41), D. A. R. Crum applied to the judge of the superior courts of the Southwestern circuit for a mandamus against J. D. Hargrove, ordinary of Dooly county, and W. B. Matthews, B. B. Pound, and M. M. Doyle, road commissioners of the Cordele district of that county, and S. R. Bolton, road overseer for such district, to compel them to have a designat

The opinion of the court was delivered by Bartholomew, J. A brief statement of the pleadings is necessary for a proper understanding of the points raised by this appeal. The complaint states that plaintiff is the owner,of a certain lot in the city of Fargo, and as his source of title avers that in December, 1881, Lafayette Hadley and Kate Irene Hadley, his wife, executed to plaintiff a mortgage on said lot to sec

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Michael L. Dwyer, J.), rendered January 20, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. *1280Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicti

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Michael L. Dwyer, J.), rendered January 20, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. *1280Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicti

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 6 KA 15-00472 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND SCUDDER, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FRANCIS FINSTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (DAVID A. COOKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANCIS FINSTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.

NO. 12-19-00389-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS FELIPE NIEVES-PEREZ, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS