Cases

127 F.Supp.2d 1326 (2001) Felicia A. BLEDSOE-COLVIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James H. ALEXANDER, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 00-T-1039-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. January 12, 2001. *1327 Mark W. Sabel, Jr., Sabel & Sabel, P. C., Montgomery, AL, for Felicia A. Bledsoe-Colvin, individual

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge The ALJ’s decision is reversed and this case is remanded for an award of benefits. The administrative record clearly demonstrates that Farley has a disability — non-convulsive epilepsy — that should have caused the ALJ to find in his favor at step three. Farl

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Roberta M. Riley brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for *640judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claims for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. The parties have cross-moved for

OPINION AND ORDER ANNA J. BROWN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Ronald P. Hase, Jr., seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) in which she denied Plaintiffs application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) under Title II of the Social Security Act. This Court has jurisdiction to review the Commissioner’s final decision pursuant to

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S ALTERNATIVE ■ MOTION FOR REMAND Thomas M. DiGirolamo, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Judith McLaughlin seeks judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or the “Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. Befo

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge Plaintiff Doris Coren (“Coren” or “plaintiff’) seeks judicial review of the denial of her application for disability benefits by defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin (“the Commissioner”), in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”). Pending before the Court are 1) plaintiff’s motion for judgment on t

DECISION AND ENTRY THOMAS M. ROSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff Michael Martin’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. On August 2, 2016, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman entered a Report and Recommend

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NANNETTE A. BAKER, UNITED . STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying Mandy Dow’s application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. Dow alleged disability due to osteoarthritis, deterioration of discs i

OPINION AND ORDER THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Plaintiff, Frenche Salaiz, seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. In September 2012, the Plaintiff protectively filed an application for Disability Insurance Benefits, alleging disability beginning on January 1, 2010. The

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying Keith Stamper’s (“Stamper”) application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. For the reasons stated herein, the Court will reverse the

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Mark Piscope brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his claim for social security income and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. Both Pi-scope and the Commissioner have moved for judgme

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR REMAND Thomas M. DiGirolamo, United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Scott Bostrom (“Plaintiff’) seeks judicial review under 42 Ü.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or the “Commissioner”) denying his applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental

OPINION AND ORDER JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Deborah Hooper (also known as Deborah Tripp) brings this action seeking judicial review of a final determination by defendant Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying Hooper’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). At the Court’s direct

ORDER Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge I. Introduction1 Plaintiff, Cathy Renee Gallo, hereinafter “Gallo,” filed a complaint2 in this Court after the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant Carolyn Colvin, hereinafter “the Commissioner,” denied her application for supplemental security income benefits.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision that due to medical improvement, Kevin M. Bennett (“Bennett”) is no longer entitled to disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq. as of January 15, 2012.

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Robert J. Quinn, Jr. (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) and seeks review of the final decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), denying Plaintiffs application for disability benefits. (Dkt. 1). Plai

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Lyndy M. Slaughter seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) in which she denied Plaintiffs applications for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) under Titles XVI and II of the Social Security Act. This matter is now bef

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. Plaintiff Nicholas N. Nguyen' seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) in which she denied Plaintiffs application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) under Title II of the Act and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under Title XVI of the Act. On Jan*

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying Thomas L. Thompson’s (“Thompson”) application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq,, and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI

ORDER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2016, upon consideration, of the report (Doc. 23) of Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn, recommending that the court dismiss the appeal of Tammy J. Orndorff (“Orndorff’) from the decision of the administrative law judge denying her application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits, and the court noting that