Cases

WOLF, J. Appellant, the former husband, entered into a marital settlement agreement with the former wife that was incorporated into the trial court’s final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The former husband later petitioned to modify the alimony awarded to the former wife in accordance with the marital settlement agreement because of the former wife’s cohabitation with a th

Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge Mr. Sidney L. Clark III (“Clark”) was convicted of the class C felony of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”) as an aggravated offender and of operating a motor vehicle without a valid license following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri (“trial court”). Clark appeals, challenging the admission and the sufficiency of the evi

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: Robin Sidney Saya appeals his conviction and 240-month sentence following a jury trial on one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crystal methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 846, and one count of attempted possession with intent to distribute crystal methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 846. Saya contends: (1) that his conviction requi

OPINION OF THE COURT Margaret Cammer, J. This is a supplemental motion by defendant Sidney Clarke pursuant to CPL 710.30 to preclude the use at trial of his statements to a public servant. The motion is grounded upon the People’s failure to serve defendant with the requisite notice of their intention to use such evidence within the statutory 15-day period. Defendant was arrested on

668 S.E.2d 296 (2008) UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY et al. v. GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION et al. No. A08A1326. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 2, 2008. *297 Newton M. Galloway, Galloway & Lyndall, Griffin, for Appellants. Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Sidney R. Barrett, Jr., Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. Petitioner Sidney Clark was convicted in 1976 by a jury in Rhode Island Superior Court of second-degree murder for the 1974 stabbing death of Claude Saunders. He is currently serving a life sentence at the Adult Correctional Institute (“ACI”) in Rhode Island and, having exhausted his state remedies, has sought habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 26-1114 SIDNEY UPCHURCH, Applicant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ____________________ On Motion for Leave to File

CLARK, Chief Judge: Sidney Wong appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his § 1983 and § 1985 claims against Garden Park Community Hospital, a private institution, the executive director of the hospital, and various members of the medical staff and board of directors. We affirm, finding that Dr. Wong’s complaint alleges no facts which, if proven, would support a finding of

IRVING, P.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Sidney Jones, Jeffrey Patrick Jones, and Lindrith Jones Thompson-hereinafter collectively referred to as the Joneses-brought a claim against Irozenell Pruitt and Bocee Pruitt-hereinafter collectively referred to as the Pruitts, as to the direct appeal-maintaining that they had acquired ownership of two segments of the Pruitts' land through either advers

CLARK, Chief Judge: The defendant, Sidney F. Mourning, appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after conviction based upon his guilty plea to money laundering charges, in violation of 31 U.S.C. §§ 5316(a), 5322(b). He challenges the findings of the district court concerning base level and specific offense characteristics, leadership role, acceptance of responsibility,

71 B.R. 747 (1987) In re Sidney R. CLARK a/k/a Sidney R. Clarke, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 84-00880K. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 10, 1987. Alvin Freiberg, Philadelphia, Pa., for debtor. Kenneth F. Carobus, Philadelphia, Pa., for Systran. Dale H. Schofield, Portland, Or., Oregon Counsel for Systran Financial Services. James N.

754 A.2d 73 (2000) STATE v. Sidney CLARK. No. 97-104-C.A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. May 18, 2000. *74 Present WEISBERGER, C.J., and LEDERBERG, FLANDERS, and GOLDBERG, JJ. Aaron L. Weisman, Providence, for plaintiff. Barbara Hurst, Paula Rosin, Providence, for defendant. OPINION WEISBERGE

Mathias, Judge. [1] This matter presents on interlocutory appeal from the Allen Superior Court's denial of Berry's motion to suppress evidence he argues was obtained through an unlawful and unreasonable search and seizure. 1 [2] We affirm. Facts and Procedural History

313 S.W.3d 772 (2010) In re SIDNEY J. No. W2008-01354-SC-R11-PT. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. February 11, 2010 Session. May 10, 2010. *773 David W. Camp and Randy C. Camp, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellants, Donald J. and Wanda J. Jeff Mueller, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellees, Donald R. and

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING IN BANC PER CURIAM: In this petition for rehearing we are asked to reconsider whether defendant-appellant Preferred Research, Inc. filed its notice of appeal prematurely. Earlier we dismissed this appeal because Preferred’s notice was filed while plaintiff-appellee Sidney Wright still had a motion for re

COFFIN, Circuit Judge. Defendants appeal from two jury verdicts holding them liable to plaintiff, Douglas S. Gomes, for violation of his constitutional and state law rights and awarding him $75,-000 in compensatory and punitive damages. On appeal, as in the proceeding below, defendants challenge both the sufficiency of the evidence to

PER CURIAM: Sidney L. Jaffe appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Finding no error in the district court’s decision, we affirm. This case has a lengthy and somewhat complicated history. In August of 1980 Jaffe was arrested in Florida and charged with twe

02/24/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 14, 2020 Session SIDNEY W. WHITE ET AL. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-18-1120 Jim Kyle, Chancellor _______________

SWYGERT, Chief Judge. This appeal is from a grant of a directed verdict for defendants at the close of the plaintiffs’ case in chief. Plaintiffs are a class of black citizens who purchased newly constructed houses in Chicago from defendants under land installment contracts during the period from 1958 to 1968. Defendants include the b

OPINION SHARON G. LEE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JJ„ joined. *682 The defendant was indicted on sixte