Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Siddiqui v. Becker”
AFFIRMED; and Opinion Filed August 4, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00943-CV BRP-ROTAX GMBH & CO. KG, Appellant V. SHEEMA SHAIK AND TOUSEEF SIDDIQUI, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Plaintiffs”), black-car drivers in the greater New York City area, brought this action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting claims against Defendants-Appellees (“Defendants”), owners of black-car “base licenses” and affiliat
Salas ex rel. Salas v. Wangpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. These are appeals from the judgment of the district court in a medical malpractice action founded on diversity of citizenship. The appeals (and cross appeal) followed a $6.5 million jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Danny Salas, by his mother and guardian ad litem, Maria E. Salas, who sued alleging that Danny had become severely brain damaged as a result o
Lamm v. McRaithpublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Lamm v. McRaith, 2012 IL App (1st) 112123 Appellate Court CRAIG B. LAMM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL T. McRAITH, Not Caption Individually, But as Director of the Division of Insurance of the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Defendant- Appellee.
Saleem v. Corporate Transportation Group, Ltd.public domain
*528 OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge: Together, the Defendants in this action operate a “black car” business that provides ground transportation services around New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. Plaintiffs are drivers who work, or have worked, for Defendants. Plaintiffs allege violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FL
Fields v. City of Tulsapublic domain
*1004 HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Paul Fields, a captain in the Tulsa, Oklahoma, police department, filed a civil-rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Tulsa; Charles Jordan, the Chief of Police; and Alvin Daryl Webster, the Deputy Chief of Police (collectively, Defendants). The suit ch
United States v. Safavianpublic domain
435 F.Supp.2d 36 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. David Hossein SAFAVIAN, Defendant. Criminal No. 05-0370 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 23, 2006. *37 *38 Nathaniel B. Edmonds, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section, Peter Robert Zeidenb
Dyer v. Maryland State Board of Educationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM James K. Bredar, United States District Judge After a nearly two-year administrative process and two unsuccessful trips through the state courts, Allen R. Dyer (“Plaintiff’), a former member of the Howard County Board of Education (the “County Board”), brought an action in this Court for declaratory relief and damages stemming from alleged violations of his due process, equal protection, and First
Sass v. Sasspublic domain
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated August 1, 1985, which granted the plaintiff wife’s motion for an order fixing arrears due under a prior pendente lite order of support dated August 7, 1984, and denied his cross motion for an order vacating a payroll deduction order, and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of a resettled judgment of t
Opinion by Judge NOONAN; Dissent by Judge CANBY. NOONAN, Circuit Judge: Cable & Computer Technology, Inc. (CCT) appeals the judgment of the district court in its action for breach of contract and related wrongs against Lockheed Sanders, Inc. (Sanders) and other Lockheed entities (collectively Lockheed or the defendants). We affirm the grant of summary judgment against CCT on its Unfair Bus
214 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2000) CABLE & COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY INC., a corporation,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.LOCKHEED SANDERS, INC., a Lockheed Martin Co., a corporation d/b/a Sanders; OPINION LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, a corporation; LOCKHEED MARTIN FEDERAL SYSTEMS, a corporation,Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-55004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Ar
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 90,196 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee/Cross-appellant, v. JOHN E. ROBINSON, SR., Appellant/Cross-appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A constitution-based clai
In re Nyse Specialists Securities Litigationpublic domain
OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Purported plaintiff class member Sea Carriers Corporation (“Sea Carriers”) has moved to: (1) “decertify” Empire Programs, Inc. of New Jersey (“Empire NJ”) as co-lead plaintiff in this consolidated class action; (2) add Sea Carriers as a named plaintiff and certify Sea Carriers to replace Empire NJ as co-lead plaintiff; and (3) approve Sea Carriers’ election of Becker
Salas v. Wangpublic domain
846 F.2d 897 25 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 791 Danny SALAS, a minor, by his mother and Guardian ad Litem,Maria E. SALAS, Appellants in No. 87-5112v.Sun-Mei WANG, M.D.; St. Joseph's Hospital a corporation ofthe State of New Jersey, Nicholas Marino, M.D.; AlbertMall, M.D.; James P. Thompson, M.D.; Mohd A. Siddiqui,M.D.; James Pascale, M.D.; Thomas E. Potter, M.D.;Kendrick P. Lance, M.D.; Colleg
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM