⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Sible v. L.A. Fitness International, LLC”

Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021-09-09 · Published · cited 7× · 13 F.4th 204
20-111 Mujo v. Jani-King International, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 (Argued: June 2, 2021 Decided: September 9, 2021) Docket No. 20-111 _____________________________________ SIMON MUJO and INDRIT MUHARREMI, on behalf of themselves and all others
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016-12-08 · Published · cited 1× · 149 A.3d 1060
Washington, Chief Judge: A.H. and T.L., biological parents of minor children A.L. and Ta.L., along with the *1068children’s aunt, E.A., challenge the trial court’s decision granting the adoption of A.L. and Ta.L. by their foster parents, R.W. and A.W. (the “W.s”), and denying E.A.’s adoption petition. This court granted the petition by appellees R.W. and A.W. for r
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
District of Columbia Court of Appeals Nos. 11-FS-1217, 11-FS-1218, 11-FS-1255, 11-FS-1256, DEC - 8 2016 11-FS-1257, 11-FS-1258, 11-FS-1259 & 11-FS-1260 IN RE TA.L.; IN RE A.L.; IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W.; IN RE PETITION OF E.A.; ADA-115-09; A.H. AND T.L. ADA-116-09; Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022-09-06 · Published · cited 36× · 47 F.4th 1278
USCA11 Case: 19-13926 Date Filed: 09/06/2022 Page: 1 of 104 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-13926 ____________________ ANTONIO GONZALEZ CARRIZOSA, et al., Plaintiffs, DOE 378, LUDY RIVAS BORJA, as da
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2025-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00838-CV IN THE INTEREST OF O.L.P., a Child From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-CI-14945 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Jud
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-02-28 · Published · cited 2× · 130 F.4th 926
Case: 23-1700 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 02/28/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC., Appellant v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, Appellee ______________________ 2023-1700 ______________________ Appeal from the Armed Services Board of C
Nevada Supreme Court · 2020-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF THE PARENTAL No. 77074 RIGHTS AS TO THE MINOR CHILD 7ie. C.A.L. 1 rr.•
Nevada Supreme Court · 2020-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF THE PARENTAL No. 77074 RIGHTS AS TO THE MINOR CHILD 7ie. C.A.L. 1 rr.•
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-02-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-15-00161-CV 05-15-00161-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 2/9/2015 3:21:23 PM NO.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014-01-13 · Published · cited 25× · 434 N.J. Super. 113; 82 A.3d 305
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2338-12T1 R.K. and A.K.,1 APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiffs-Appellants, January 13, 2014 v. APPELLATE DIVISION D.L.,
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010-10-18 · Published · cited 18× · 747 F. Supp. 2d 49
747 F.Supp.2d 49 (2010) FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY ADVISOR A FUND, LLC, BY the TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Fidelity High Tech Advisor a Fund, LLC, by the Tax Matters Partner, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant. Civil Nos. 05-40151-FDS, 06-40130-FDS, 06-40243-FDS, 06-40244-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-04-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00295-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/3/2015 11:45:08 AM
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021-08-02 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 20-1922 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 v. THE FARFIELD COMPANY, Appellant _______________________
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021-07-13 · Published · cited 32× · 5 F.4th 315
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 20-1922 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 v. THE FARFIELD COMPANY, Appellant _______________________
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024-07-31 · Published · cited 7× · 108 F.4th 1376
Case: 23-1336 Document: 44 Page: 1 Filed: 07/31/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SANHO CORP., Appellant v. KAIJET TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2023-1336 ______________________ Appeal from
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 23-1336 Document: 44 Page: 1 Filed: 07/31/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SANHO CORP., Appellant v. KAIJET TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2023-1336 ______________________ Appeal from
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022-05-10 · Published · cited 17× · 343 Conn. 309
AGW SONO PARTNERS, LLC v. DOWNTOWN SOHO, LLC, ET AL. (SC 20625) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus The plaintiff sought to recover damages from the defendants, D Co., and its managing member, E, in connection with D Co.’s breach of a commercial lease agreement for certain premises, which D Co. used to operate a restaurant and bar. D
District Court, D. Maryland · 2017-10-17 · Published · cited 0× · 265 F. Supp. 3d 570
MEMORANDUM OPINION THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge For the third time this year, President Donald J. Trump has issued an order banning the entry into the United States, with some exceptions, of nationals of multiple predominantly Muslim nations. At issue is whether this latest travel, ban should be enjoined by this Court because'it is the latest incarnatio
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020-04-30 · Published · cited 17× · 957 F.3d 1309
Case: 19-1063 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 04/30/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GRIT ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant v. OREN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2019-1063 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trade