Cases

(2008) SHUFFLE MASTER, INC., and IGT, Plaintiffs, v. MP GAMES LLC d/b/a Mindplay Games, Robert Mouchou, Alliance Gaming Corp. d/b/a Bally Gaming and Systems and Bally Gaming, Inc., Defendants. No. 3:04-CV-00407-ECR (RAM). United States District Court, D. Nevada. March 21, 2008. ORDER EDWARD C. REED, JR., District Judge. Plaintiffs Shuffle Mas

610 F.Supp.2d 288 (2009) IGT, Plaintiff, v. BALLY GAMING INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 06-282-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. April 28, 2009. *294 William J. Wade, Esquire and Anne Shea Gaza, Esquire of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE, Of Counsel: *295

David Nuffer, United States District Judge OVERVIEW This case was tried over 12 days in April and June 2018.1 The United States presented *1121testimony from 25 witnesses, both live and via deposition designation. Defendants rested their case without calling a single witness, but

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Mayer. Chen, Circuit Judge. Marco Guldenaar Holding B.V. (Appellant) appeals the final decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) affirming the rejection of claims 1-3, 5, 7-14, 16-18, and 23-30 of U.S. Patent Application No. 13/078,196 (the '196 patent application) under

WENTWORTH, J. Nick Popovich appeals the Indiana Department of State Revenue's Proposed Assessments of adjusted gross income tax (AGIT) for the 2003 and 2004 tax years. The Court, having previously determined that the Department's 2003 Proposed Assessment was void, see Popovich v. Indiana Dep't of State Revenue ( Popovich VII ), <

AMY J. ST. EVE, United States Circuit Court Judge* This antitrust suit was born when a monopolist in one market decided not to do business with a competitor from a related market. The monopolist, Comcast Corporation, denied its competitor, Viamedia, Inc., access (or access on terms Viamedia considered reasonable) to much-needed sales platforms called interconnects. Hurting as it lost revenue and customer

OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge: Section 1500 of Title 28 of the United States Code bars litigation in this court of *691 the same dispute pending in another court. Passed shortly after the Civil War, and long outliving its original purpose, this gatekeeper provision has oft been des

201 F.Supp.2d 335 (2002) PHARMACIA CORP., Pharmacia AB, Pharmacia Enterprises S.A. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Co., Plaintiffs, v. ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 01-1539(WGB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. May 14, 2002. *336 *337 *338<

723 F.Supp.2d 766 (2010) George KALMAN v. Pedro A. CORTES, et al. Civil Action No. 09-684. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 30, 2010. *769 Mary Catherine Roper, ACLU of PA, Thomas H. Lee, II, Dechert Price Rhoads, Matthew Bleich, Conrad O'Brien, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. Barry N. Kramer, PA Offi

14 So.3d 311 (2008) J. Robert WOOLEY, As Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana v. Thomas S. LUCKSINGER, Michael D. Nadler, Stephen J. Nazarenus, Scott Westbrook, Michael K. Jhin, William F. Galtney, John P. Mudd, Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc., Executive Risk Management Associates, Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Co., Executive Liability Underwriters and Greenwich Insurance Co., AmCareco, Inc., AmCare Management, Inc. J. Rob

416 F.Supp.2d 1098 (2005) Dr. Steven MACARTHUR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAN JUAN COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:00 CV 00584 BSJ. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. June 13, 2005. *1099 *1100 *1101 *1102<

417 F.Supp.2d 477 (2006) WESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK, the Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck, Mauro Gabriele, George Mgrditchian, Peter Jackson, Barry Weprin and Clark Neuringer, in their Official Capacity as Members of the Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck, and Antonio Vozza, in his Official Capacity as a Former Member of the Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck, Defendants.

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu

527 F.Supp.2d 262 (2007) In re INTELLIGROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 04-1980 (GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 13, 2007. *263 *264 *265 *266 *267