Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Elliot Steinberg and Appellee Commissioner of Internal Revenue entered a settlement agreement specifying Appellant’s tax deficiency for the years 1980 and 1981. The Commissioner prepared a stipulated decision based on this *499agreement. Appellant refused to sign the decision, contending that the 1980 tax deficiency should be

91 N.Y.2d 577 (1998) 696 N.E.2d 978 673 N.Y.S.2d 966 Thomas Majewski, Respondent, v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School District, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Adirondack Mechanical Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued March 26, 1998 Decided May 12, 1998.

OPINION OF THE COURT Mercure, J. The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether sections 2 through 9 of the Omnibus Workers’ Compensation Reform Act of 1996 (see, L 1996, ch 635 [eff Sept. 10, 1996] [hereinafter the Omnibus Act] should be applied to claims pending but not yet reduced to final judgment on the effective date of the Omnibus Act. For the reasons that follow, we hold that these sections sh

335 B.R. 539 (2005) In re STUDENT FINANCE CORPORATION, Debtor. Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee of Student Finance Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Pepper Hamilton LLP, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02-11620-JBR. Adversary No. 04-56423-PBL. Civ.A. No. 04-1551-JJF. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. December 22, 2005.

224 B.R. 701 (1997) Bankruptcy Estate of Nancy RAMPY, James E. Ramette, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellant, v. William F. MESSERLI and Messerli and Kramer, P.A., Appellees. Civ. No. 97-494/RHK. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. May 5, 1997. *702 Rebecca E. Bender, Bender & Ford, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant. Lynn

Magdeline D. Coleman, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION By Order dated January 17, 2014, this Court sustained objections to the Second Interim and Final Application for Compensation *113and Reimbursement of Expenses (the "Final Application"),1 filed by the Law O

521 F.Supp.2d 188 (2007) S&L VITAMINS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AUSTRALIAN GOLD, INC., Defendant. No. 05-CV-1217 (JS)(MLO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 30, 2007. *189 *190 *191 *192

OPINION OF THE COURT Fein, J. Defendants Gerald Schoenfeld, Bernard B. Jacobs and Marie M. Sawicki appeal from (1) an order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Tyler, J.), entered September 30, 1980, which converted their motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) to one for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [c]); (2) that part of a resettled order and inte

709 F.Supp. 1279 (1989) Douglas J. MICHELSON, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Nelson Bunker Hunt, William Herbert Hunt, Douglas Herbert Hunt, Lamar Hunt, International Metals Investment Company, Ltd., John J. Conheeney, ContiCommodity Services, Inc., ContiCapital Management, Inc., ContiCapital, Ltd., Norton Waltuch, Gilian Financial, ACLI International Commodity Services, Inc., Bache Halsey Stuart Shield, Inc., Shie

DOYLE, Circuit Judge. This is one facet of an antitrust suit which was brought under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The essence of the action was the alleged conspiracy engaged in by the defendants to fix the price of liquid asphalt. Two other cases involve several of the same defendants named in the present action and also the same conspiracy. See Standard Industries, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 475 F.2d 220 (

523 F.2d 125 1975-1 Trade Cases 60,357 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF CUSTER, andJ. D. Metcalfe, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, forthemselves and for all others similarlysituated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.WILSHIRE OIL COMPANY OF TEXAS, a corporation, et al., Defendants,Including Mid-America Refining Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 74-1553.

399 F.Supp. 838 (1975) Richard E. HITT, Plaintiff, v. NISSAN MOTOR COMPANY, LTD., et al., Defendants.[*] No. 74-1647-Civ-CA. United States District Court, S. D. Florida. July 21, 1975. *839 Sager & Burns, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff. Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl, Miami, Fla., for defenda

This is an action brought by Katherine M. Atwood, Verge Crossman, Birdie Nephew, Noel Wright, Marie E. Marlar, Harold Wright, W.B. Marlar, Hazel Eymann, John C. Wiseman, Frank K. Wiseman, Florence Morton, Newton Wiseman, Ellen Hedrick and Clarence Estes, plaintiffs, and Sue H. Clowdsley, administratrix of the estate of Newton Wiseman, deceased, Gladys I. Selby, administratrix of the estate of John C. Wiseman, deceased, Mary Freear, administratrix of the estate of Frank Wiseman, deceas

Martin, J.: The plaintiff obtained an order on March 7, 1924, requiring the defendants to show cause why they should not be enjoined from interfering with plaintiff’s collection and receipt of moneys from the sale of tickets at Thomashefsky’s Broadway Yiddish Theatre, and from interfering with the plaintiff in conducting said theatre. The order to show cause temporarily restrained defendants. The plaintif

588 F.Supp. 247 (1984) Irene ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. C-79-0515J. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. May 10, 1984. *248 *249 *250 *251

Action to recover the amounts evidenced by three checks drawn on and payable to defendant bank. It is charged that the checks were paid and charged against plaintiffs' account and the proceeds thereof disposed of without plaintiffs' authority or consent. Verdict and judgment were for plaintiffs for $8084.88 (including interest) and defendant has appealed. Error is assigned on the giving and refusal of instructions and the exclusion of evidence. Plaintiffs are co-trustees of an express