Cases

OPINION EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice. In this probate proceeding, after the probate court admitted Zachary Thomas’s will to probate, appellees, Jerry and Lyda Ann Thomas, Zachary’s parents, filed an application to determine heirship, which was opposed by appellant, Reuben Haga, Zachary’s former step-son and a purported beneficiary under the will. In response

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2009-CA-01678-SCT SHIRLEY JEAN COLLINS v. KOPPERS, INC. f/k/a KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC., BEAZER EAST, INC. f/k/a BEAZER MATERIAL AND SERVICES, HANSON, PLC, HANSON BUILDING MATERIAL LIMITED f/k/a HANSON, PLC, HANSON HOLDINGS LIMITED, HANSON HOLDINGS BASALT, INC., HANSON HOLDINGS ARAGONITE, INC., HBMA HOLDING, INC. AND THREE RIVERS MANAGEMENT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/09/2009 TRIAL JUDGE: H

Opinion by Watkins, J., In this unemployment compensation appeal the Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee, and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, all found that the claimant was not entitled to benefits because of willful misconduct in violation of the provisions of §402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802 (e). The claimant, John R. Shirley, was last employ

Affirmed. *Page 695

COBB, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. The Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance filed a formal complaint charging Judge Shirley C. Byers, Circuit Court Judge for the Fourth Circuit District, with judicial misconduct. After investigation a three-member committee appointed by the Commission conducted a trial and submitted its Committee Findings of Fact and Recommendations to the Commission. Judge Byers

LAMAR, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Shirley Collins filed suit against Koppers, Inc., and several other defendants, alleging that she was injured as a result of environmental contamination by a wood-treatment facility. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss after Collins repeatedly failed to comply with a court order to provide expert opinions that causally linked her injuries to the alleged contamination.

144 Wis.2d 596 (1988) 424 N.W.2d 698 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Reuben Lee MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 86-0879-CR. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued April 26, 1988. Decided June 24, 1988. *599 For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued

*1226 PER CURIAM: Yuby Ramirez, Edward Lezcano, and Jairo Castro (collectively the defendants) appeal the life sentences they received after a jury found them guilty of witness tampering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1)(C). 1 They assert

Talking Capital LLC v Omanoff (2019 NY Slip Op 00963) Talking Capital LLC v Omanoff 2019 NY Slip Op 00963 Decided on February 7, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

CLARK, Judge. The sole question presented by defendants is whether the lower court erred in entering the order allowing plaintiffs to survey on defendants’ lands. However, the threshold question to be considered, although not argued by either party, is whether an appeal lies from Judge McDarris’s order. While final judgments are always appealable, interlocutory decrees are immediately ap-pealable only when they affect some sub

Opinion for the Court filed by ROBINSON, Circuit Judge. SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge: This appeal exacts a review of the District Court’s summary dismissal of an employment-discrimination action. 1 Appellant had alleged that, because of her sex and her husband’s Arabic descent, she

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-593 No. COA20-764 Filed 2 November 2021 Wake County, No. 16 CRS 203857 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MATTHEW LANE, JR. Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 5 September 2019 by Judge A. Graham Shirley in Wake County Superior Court. Heard in the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-593 No. COA20-764 Filed 2 November 2021 Wake County, No. 16 CRS 203857 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MATTHEW LANE, JR. Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 5 September 2019 by Judge A. Graham Shirley in Wake County Superior Court. Heard in the Court

784 N.W.2d 605 (2010) 2010 WI 61 In the Matter of JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST the Honorable Michael J. GABLEMAN. Wisconsin Judicial Commission, Complainant, v. The Honorable Michael J. Gableman, Respondent. No. 2008AP2458-J. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Decided June 30, 2010. SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J., ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.

217 Ga. 372 (1961) 122 S.E.2d 106 MID-STATE HOMES INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al. v. WIGGINS et al. 21393. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued September 12, 1961. Decided October 9, 1961. Rehearing Denied October 24, 1961. *373 George P. Dillard, Reuben M. Word, for plai

196 Md. 168 (1950) 76 A.2d 139 ASHMAN v. SCHECTER ET AL. [No. 2, October Term, 1950.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided November 1, 1950. The cause was argued before MARBURY, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ. Louis S. Ashman, with whom were Ashman & Link on the brief, for appellant.

The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court filed a Final Report in the office of the Clerk of this court on July 8, 1992. This Final Report recommended that the respondent, Leroy Reuben Boykin, Attorney Registration No. 0031378, be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R.V(6)(B). The board further recommended that prior to reinstatement, the respondent be required to reimburse Shirley Hendricks

478 F.Supp.2d 1044 (2007) Brian MAXEY, Plaintiff, v. Thomas MONAHAN, et al., Defendants. No. 06 C 5153. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 20, 2007. *1045 Jason Andrew Burlingame, Perkins Coie LLC, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Shirley Ruth Calloway, Austin Enrico Franklin, Illinois Attorney

The appeal is on the record proper without a transcript of the testimony. The verdict, judgment, sentence, and taking of the appeal were January 17, 1962. On February 14, 1962, a motion for a new trial was filed. The motion was not called to the attention of the trial judge until March 19, 1962, at which time the court granted the state's motion to strike the motion for a new trial because it was not presented to the court within the time required by law. On April 25, 19

242 S.C. 497 (1963) 131 S.E.2d 506 Worthey HAYES, Respondent, v. Lonzo ISRAEL, J.E. Israel, Leo Israel, Cornie Israel, Irene Duncan, Randal McCormick, and Shirley Faye McCormick, of whom Lonzo Israel is, Appellant. 18083 Supreme Court of South Carolina. June 12, 1963. *498 Messrs. Stevens & Holt