Cases

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 98. {dissenting). The majority reverses the court of appeals not because of any legal or factual error. Rather, the majority in essence disregards the standard of review and reverses the court of appeals simply because it does not agree with the outcome. ¶ 99. The standard of review in this case requires us to determine whether the court of appeals erroneously exercised its discr

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 37. {concurring). The court phrases the question presented as follows: "If an insured requests an increase in insurance coverage and the insurance agent has not agreed to procure it, does the agent have a duty to procure it?" Majority op., ¶ 2. The majority opinion answers this easy question "No." Majority op., ¶ 2. I agree with the answer to the question posed. ¶ 38. N

MACY, Justice. This is an appeal by the State of Wyoming from the dismissal of its action to set aside a prior order of the district court terminating the parental rights of the father in relation to his minor child. In the unusual posture of this case, both the father and the mother are appellees advocating the validity and finality of the prior termination order and the propriety of the subsequent dismissal of the State’

786 F.Supp.2d 887 (2011) Ryan McFADYEN, Matthew Wilson and Breck Archer, Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. No. 1:07CV953. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. March 31, 2011. *898 Robert C. Ekstrand, Ekstrand & Ekstrand, LLP, Durham, NC, for Plaintiffs. Jamie S. Gorelick, Jennifer M. O'C

207 P.3d 911 (2009) Dionne DOTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dell L. BERNSTEIN, P.C., M.D., Defendant-Appellee. No. 08CA0020. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. March 5, 2009. *912 Darrell S. Elliott, P.C., Darrell S. Elliott, Nicole Daniels, Michael Born, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Ruddy & Wolanske LLC,

994 F.Supp. 691 (1998) UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 204, and Brian Murphy, Plaintiffs, v. Joseph B. DOCKERY, Defendant. No. Civ.1:97CV01144. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Durham Division. January 16, 1998. Joyce M. Brooks, Charlotte, NC, for Plaintiffs. James Avery Roberts, III, Lewis & Roberts, P.L.L.C., Raleigh, NC

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED JANUARY SESSION, 1998 October 19, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Appellate Court Clerk C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9704-CR-00156 ) Appellee, ) ) )

WINTER, Circuit Judge: Larry Stryker petitions for review of an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) denying his claim for a whistleblower award. He sought the award under Section 21F of the DoddFrank Act (“Dodd-Frank”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6, based on information he supplied to the SEC that it relied upon in a successful enforcement action. The SEC held that, bec

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 10, 2001 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LISA ANN AVERY Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County No. 20CR-1451 C. Creed McGinley, Judge No. W2000-01741-CCA-R3-CD - Filed July 16, 2001 The Defendant was indicted by the Carroll County Grand Jury for one coun

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON VIRGIL L. HITCHCOCK and ) SHIRLEY R. HITCHCOCK, ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) Shelby Circuit No. 62436 ) vs. ) ) ALLEN S. BO

GEE, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to a court order, the FBI began intercepting telephone conversations of appellant Jerry Wood, a Dallas bookmaker. The interception, which continued from November 27, 1975, to December 9, 1975, and which produced recordings of more 1,100 calls, resulted in indictments against Wood, Virginia Avanell Smi

ACCEPTED 01-15-00556-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/21/2015 10:14:05 PM CHRIST

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00286-CV Shirley Sawyer, Appellant v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. FM004649, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEM

337 S.E.2d 786 (1985) 315 N.C. 1 STATE of North Carolina v. Leonard D. AVERY. No. 561A83. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 10, 1985. *788 Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Christopher P. Brewer, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. Ann F. Loflin and Thomas F. Loflin, III, for defendant-appellant

OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. In this products liability case, Plaintiff Michael Gilfeather, who was severely injured in a workplace accident involving a truck-mounted crane manufactured by Defendant Manitowoc Boom Trucks, appeals from the magistrate judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant. Plaintiff also appeals the magist

276 S.E.2d 699 (1981) STATE of North Carolina v. Theodore AVERY. No. 89. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 7, 1981. *701 Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by James Peeler Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, and Lex Allen Watson, II, 1980 Summer Intern, Campbell Law School, for the State. Joseph J. Flythe, Ahoskie, for defen

423 F.3d 241 James M. McGOWAN, Sr., Appellantv.NJR SERVICE CORPORATION; New Jersey Natural Gas Company. No. 04-3620. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued June 8, 2005. September 13, 2005. Samuel J. Halpern (Argued), West Orange, NJ, for Appellant.

772 P.2d 1054 (1989) STATE of Wyoming, ex rel. TRL, a minor, by Steve M. AVERY, Guardian Ad Litem, Appellant (Petitioner), v. RLP and DLL, Appellees (Respondents). No. 88-253. Supreme Court of Wyoming. April 17, 1989. Myron L. Barton, Riverton, guardian ad litem, Joseph B. Meyer, Atty. Gen., Peter J. Mulvaney, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Shirley A. Kingston, Asst. Atty.

129 F.Supp.2d 966 (2000) Lee DILLWORTH, Plaintiff, v. Eric CLARK, Mississippi Secretary of State; Mike Moore, Mississippi Attorney General; Barbara Dunn, Hinds County Circuit Clerk; Marilyn M. Avery, Hinds County Election Commission —District 1; Ruth Shirley, Hinds County Election Commission— District 3; Lelia Rhodes, Hinds County Election Commission—District 5, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 3:99-CV-713WS. Un

STEPHEN.H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. Cornell Jones appeals a decision of the United States Tax Court sustaining an income tax deficiency for the calendar year 1985 in the amount of $16,490,402 together with additions to tax under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6651(a)(1), 6653(a)(1), 6654, and 6661 totalling $4,125,107. Jones v. Commissioner, No. 36601-86 (T.C. Aug. 18, 1988)