Cases

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Shirley Ingram seeks to appeal the district court’s order directing him to file a response within 30 days indicating whether he agrees to the recharacterization of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 37 motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 96-2533 ___________ Luebertha Ingram, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Co

864 S.W.2d 237 (1993) 314 Ark. 553 Roy and Norma Shirley INGRAM, Husband and Wife, and Kenneth and Kathy Ingram, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. Sedric and Phyllis WIRT, Husband and Wife, and George and Trudy Henley, Husband and Wife, Appellees. No. 93-278. Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 1, 1993. *238

*91 OPINION AND ORDER BARBOUR, District Judge. The Court has before it the Motion of Defendants to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. After considering the Motion, Response and supporting and opposing memoranda submitted by the parties, the Court rules that the Motion to Dismiss is not well taken and is hereby denied. I. BACKGR

Eric Zachery Ingram, the appellant, was convicted of the illegal possession of a pistol in violation of Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-11-72(a), and was sentenced to five years' imprisonment. He raises two issues on this direct appeal from that conviction. I. The appellant contends that he was denied a speedy trial. Although the appellant filed a motion seeking the dismissal of the indictment for failure to prosecute, the recor

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. Luebertha Ingram appeals from the district court’s order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Commissioner). The district court found substantial evidence to support the determination that Ingram was not disabled and granted the Commissioner’s motio

874 P.2d 1282 (1994) In the Matter of the ESTATE of Lola Jane INGRAM, Deceased. Shirley GAZALSKI, Individually and in Her Capacity As Personal Representative of the Estate of Lola Jane Ingram, Appellant, v. Norma GOSS and Doyle Ingram, Appellees. No. 79637. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. May 17, 1994. Donald W. Henson, Okmulgee, for appellant. Ron Wright, Mus

Timothy Ingram, et al. v. Cantwell-Cleary Co., Inc. No. 421, Sept. Term 2022 Opinion by Leahy, J. Antitrust and Trade Regulation > Trade Secrets and Proprietary Information > In General > Statutory provisions Because the Maryland Uniform Trade Secrets Act, (or “MUTSA”), codified at Maryland Code (1975, 2013 Repl. Vol.), Commercial Law Article (“CL”), Sections 11-1201–1209, explicitly directs that a breach of contract claim—regardless of whether said claim is “based upon misappropriation of a tr

BECTON, Judge. This appeal is without merit, for the simple reason that the unchallenged verdict of the jury necessarily and conclusively compels our ruling that appellants, Shirley Casper Ingram and her mother, Bessie Casper Burrow, cannot have suffered harm from the errors alleged. I Appellants initiated a special proceeding for the partition of certain land held as a tenancy in common

Donald Shirley (employee) brought this action under the Workmen's Compensation Act to recover benefits from John Deere Insurance Company, insurer for Joe Money Machinery Company (employer), for a shoulder injury resulting from an accident which occurred during his employment with the employer. The trial court found in favor of the employee, and the employer appeals. We affirm. The dispositive issue is whether the trial court committed reversible error in its determination that

[Cite as State v. Ingram, 2011-Ohio-6629.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96509 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

714 S.E.2d 636 (2011) 311 Ga. App. 141 The STATE v. SHIRLEY. No. A11A0500. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 30, 2011. Reconsideration Denied July 26, 2011. *637 Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Lenny I. Krick, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellant. Bruce Steven Harvey, for appellee.

2008 MT 61N STATE OF MONTANA Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KENNETH INGRAM, a/k/a KENNETH IRVIN IGRAHAM, Defendant and Appellant. No. DA 06-0811. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs: January 23, 2008. Decided: February 20, 2008. For Appellant: Sunday Z. Rossberg, Rossberg Law Office, L.L.C., Great Falls, Montana. For Appellee: Honorable

OPINION HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT The plaintiffs, who claim property interests along a rail line in Beaufort County, South Carolina, filed a complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging that the government caused uncompensated takings of their property interests pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The rail line at issue in the above captioned ease

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00844-CV Shirley M. RACKLEY, Appellant v. Kevin KURZ, Appellee From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

41 So.3d 95 (2009) TUSCALOOSA CHEVROLET, INC. v. Shirley GUYTON. 2080590. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. December 11, 2009. *96 John Martin Galese and Cassandra J. Harris of Galese & Ingram, P.C., Birmingham, for appellant. Glenn Carlyle Noe, Vernon, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Tuscaloosa Chevrolet, Inc

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 2, 2000 Session SHIRLEY JEANETTE BARLOW v. JARVIS KAY BARLOW Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wilson County No. 1647 Clara Byrd, Judge No. M1999-00749-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 19, 2003 These parties were married for twenty-seven years before the wife abandoned the m

This appeal, which was transferred from the Alabama Supreme Court pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala. Code 1975, concerns the proper venue of, and the qualifications of an executor in, a case involving the administration of a decedent's estate. In September 2003, the decedent, Marian E. Hawkins, died in Birmingham, Alabama. *Page 782 In October 2003, Shirley Scroggins, Hawkins's daughter, petitioned the Jefferso

The sole issue in this case is whether the award of attorney fees to the plaintiffs' counsel out of the proceeds of a sale of certain real property in Baldwin County was erroneous. The history of this case is protracted and involves three prior appeals *Page 470 to this Court. See Cherry v. Mazzone, 568 So.2d 799 (Ala. 1990); Hall v. Mazzone, 540 So.2d 1353 (Al