Cases

41 Ill. App.2d 23 (1963) 190 N.E.2d 1 Fred T. Calvert, Administrator of the Estate of Alma Lee Morgan, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard L. Morgan, Administrator of the Estate of Shirley F. Morgan, Deceased, Defendant-Appellee. Gen. No. 11,704. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District, First Division. April 30, 1963.

347 S.W.3d 734 (2011) Younan NOWZARADAN, M.D., Appellant v. Shirley H. RYANS, Appellee. No. 14-10-00381-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). May 26, 2011. Rehearing En Banc Overruled June 28, 2011. *736 T. Marc Calvert, Houston, for appellant. Tommy W. Gillaspie, Leslie C. Taylor, Houston,

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00508-CV ____________________ ELTON SENEGAL D/B/A ELTON’S CONSTRUCTION, Appellant V. SHIRLEY PAYNE AND JAMES PAYNE, Appellees _________________________________

459 F.Supp. 979 (1978) NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. James Henry CALVERT, et al., Defendants. No. 73-324C(3). United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D. November 14, 1978. Don B. Sommers, Sommers & Holloran, Inc., St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff. P. Terence Crebs, Frederick J. Dana, Gallop, Johnson, Godiner, Morganstern &

787 P.2d 668 (1990) Shirley WARGON, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE of the State of Colorado, and Alta Mode, Inc., Respondents. No. 89CA1108. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. January 25, 1990. *669 Eric J. Pringle, Denver, for petitioner. Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty.

410 F.Supp. 937 (1976) NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. James Henry CALVERT et al., Defendants. No. 73-324C(4). United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D. March 23, 1976. P. Terence Crebs, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff. Rooney, Webbe, Davidson & Schlueter, St. Louis, Mo., for James H. Calvert and Ronald Calvert. And

CALVERT, Chief Justice. By their suit petitioners, W. Floyd Deacon, Priest Baze and C. O. Crumbley, plaintiffs in the trial court, sought judgment declaring City of Euless annexation ordinances Nos. 189, 190 and 192 void, and enjoining the City and its officers from levying taxes against their lands and otherwise attempting to exercise municipal jurisdiction over the same. The City of Euless answered the suit by plea in abatem

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL

414 S.W.2d 164 (1967) Shirley A. KAUFMAN, Petitioner, v. Louis S. MILLER, Respondent. No. A-11730. Supreme Court of Texas. April 19, 1967. John H. Benckenstein, Beaumont, for petitioner. John T. Lindsey, Port Arthur, Payton R. Covington, Lake Charles, La., for respondent. CALVERT, Chief Justice. This is a suit for damages for personal injuries b

151 Ariz. 194 (1986) 726 P.2d 610 PHIL BRAMSEN DISTRIBUTOR, INC., an Arizona corporation; and Philip D. Bramsen, Sr., and Maureen E. Bramsen, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Counter-defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Joseph MASTRONI and Shirley Mastroni, husband and wife; Harold H. Kuhse and Jeanne M. Kuhse, husband and wife, Defendants/Counter-claimants/Cross-Claimants/Appellee/Cross-Appellants. R. Ward CALVERT and Jo

349 S.W.2d 579 (1961) STATE of Texas et al., Petitioners, v. T. W. LAIN et al., Respondents. No. A-8109. Supreme Court of Texas. July 19, 1961. Rehearing Denied October 3, 1961. *580 Will Wilson, Atty. Gen., Ben M. Harrison, James H. Rogers and Thomas Burrus, Asst. Attys. Gen., Maco Stewart, Galveston, for petiti

282 S.W.2d 378 (1955) D. E. WHELAN et al., Petitioners, v. The STATE of Texas et al., Respondents. No. A-4921. Supreme Court of Texas. July 13, 1955. Rehearing Denied October 19, 1955. *379 John E. Taylor, Marshall, Morton Taylor, Sinton, Dibrell, Gardner, Dotson & Graham, Sam J. Dotson, San Antonio, Hart, Br

Dissenting Opinion by BATTAGLIA, J. I respectfully dissent. In this case we have been asked to decide if under Sections 3-203 and 3-206 of the Estates and Trusts Article and Maryland Rule 6-411(c), the Orphans’ Court, or the Circuit Court on de novo appeal, has the discretion to accept a surviving spouse’s fifth petition for extension of

OPINION Shirley Jones sued Pauline Wallingsford for damages and injuries arising from an automobile collision. The jury found that Jones and Wallingsford were each 50 percent negligent and awarded Jones $1,250 for physical injuries. The jury awarded Jones "zero" dollars for damages to her vehicle. Jones appeals. Because we find that the jury's answer that Jones suffered no loss to her vehicle is so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be ma

Dorothy Henneberry brought this action against William Henneberry, alleging that she is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in certain real property in San Francisco, that William is wrongfully in possession of the *Page 127 property against her will, and demanding restitution of the property to her. By answer, William denied that plaintiff owns any interest in the property. The trial court found that plaintiff is not the owner of any inte

116 Cal.App.2d 310 (1953) FLORA ELLIS, Appellant, v. SALVATORE D'ANGELO, a Minor, etc., et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 15173. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. Two. Feb. 27, 1953. Shirley, Saroyan, Calvert & Sullivan for Appellant. Alexander, Bacon & Mundhenk and Herbert Chamberlin for Respondents. DOOLING, J. The plai

139 Cal.App.2d 326 (1956) MAX WOHLGEMUTH, Appellant, v. PAUL MEYER et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 16379. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One. Feb. 20, 1956. Shirley, Saroyan, Calvert & Peterson and Sanford N. Diller for Appellant. Peart, Baraty & Hassard and Robert D. Huber for Respondents. BRAY, J. Plaintiff appeals

307 F.3d 1317 GULF POWER COMPANY; Alabama Power Company, et al., Petitioners,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States, Respondents.Commonwealth Edison Company, Petitioner,v.Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.Potomac Electric Power Company, Petitioner,v.Federal Communications Commission and United States, Respondents.Texas Utilities Electric Company, Petitioner

OAKES, Circuit Judge: Cognizant that four other courts of appeals and a number of district courts have held otherwise, we nevertheless are convinced after extreme care and consideration that regulations issued by the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) 1 concerning sex discrimination in educa

PER CURIAM: Claimants brought this action to recover damages to their 1987 Volkswagen Goff, which occurred when claimant, Rod R. Bradley, was driving the automobile on the Lee Street Bridge, in Charleston, Kanawha County on February 8,1994. Claimants sustained damages in the amount of $720.79. The evidence adduced at the hearing of this claim on May 12, 1994, revealed that claimant Rod R. Bradley was operat