Cases

BARNES, Presiding Judge, dissenting. The warrant affidavit in this case alleged only two things to establish probable cause: (1) that the FBI received a lead from unnamed German authorities who had identified several Internet Protocol addresses from which image files were accessed on a website used “to distribute Child Pornography,” and (2) that one of these addresses belonged to an account owned by Shirley. The

828 F.2d 1253 Shirley BARNES, Appellee,Frances J. McElroy and Murrell Thomas,v.Freeman (Teek) BOSLEY and Paula Carter, Appellants.Shirley BARNES, Appellant,Frances J. McElroy and Murrell Thomas,v.Freeman (Teek) BOSLEY and Paula Carter, Appellees. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1987.Decided Sept. 8, 1987.

LEE, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. In this fee dispute between attorney and client, we must decide whether the circuit court erred in sanctioning the attorney and entering a judgment in favor of the client. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 2. A petition to modify child custody was filed in the Chancery Court of M

764 F.2d 490 Shirley BARNES, Frances J. McElroy and Murrell Thomas, Appellees,v.Freeman (Teek) BOSLEY and Paula Carter, Appellants.Shirley BARNES, Frances J. McElroy, Appellants,and Murrell Thomas,v.Freeman (Teek) BOSLEY and Paula Carter, Appellees.Shirley BARNES, Frances J. McElroy and Murrell Thomas, Appellants,v.Freeman (Teek) BOSLEY and Paula Carter, Appellees. Nos. 83-2127, 83-2178

745 F.2d 501 Shirley BARNES, Frances J. McElroy and Murrell Thomas, Appellees,v.Freeman (Teek) BOSLEY and Paula Carter, Appellants.Shirley BARNES, Frances J. McElroy, Appellants,andMurrell Thomas,v.Freeman (Teek) BOSLEY and Paula Carter, Appellees.Shirley BARNES, Frances J. McElroy and Murrell Thomas, Appellant,v.Freeman (Teek) BOSLEY and Paula Carter, Appellees. Nos. 83-2127, 83-217

PER CURIAM: Shirley A. Barnes appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barnes v. Sam’s E. Wholesale Club # 8220, No. 7:15-cv-00217-GEC (W.D.Va. Aug. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs Shirley Barnes, Frances McElroy, and Murrell Thomas, former employees of the St. Louis City Circuit Court, filed a civil rights complaint against the circuit clerk alleging that their discharges were unconstitutionally based on their political affiliation. The District Court entered judgment for Barnes and McElroy and ordered that they be reinstated with bac

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.

JAMES, J., for the Court:- ¶ 1. Shirley Warren was indicted by a Winston County grand jury on one count of possession of a controlled substance in a correctional facility pursuant-to Mississippi Code Annotated section 47-5-198 (Rev. 2011). A jury trial was held in the Circuit Court of Winston County, resulting in a guilty verdict. Warren was sentenced to seven years in the custody.of the Mississippi Departmen

WESTBROOKS, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. The executor of the estate of James R. Pounds (Pounds Estate), and heirs individually, appeal the ruling of the Prentiss County Chancery Court. The chancellor reformed the warranty deed of the subject property, finding that the deed mistakenly included property not mutually agreed u

FAIR, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Shirley Hearn appeals the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment against her in this ejectment case. Hearn contends that summary judgment should not have been .granted because Bayview Loan Servicing filed a “brief in. support” rather than a motion for summary judgment. We conclude that

MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVID P. MCDONALD, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Regency Motors, Inc. filed this adversary proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt incurred from the sale of an automobile. Regency asserted that Debtors James and Shirley Barnes committed fraud when they sold the vehicle to Regency by failing to disclose the existence of a prior lienholder. Regency alleged that the debt i

JAMES, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Shirley Adams filed a complaint as the sole heir of her deceased mother, Dorothy Turner, against Graceland Care Center of Oxford LLC (Graceland Care Center), Graceland Management Company Inc. (Graceland Management), Yalobusha General Hospital and Nursing Home (Ya-lobusha), and Lafayette LTC Inc. (Lafay*599ette) (collecti

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-01302-COA DARRYL RANDALL STASHER SR. APPELLANT v. SHIRLEY A. STASHER APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/21/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CYNTHIA L. BREWER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR A

263 S.W.3d 697 (2008) Charles BARNES and Shirley Barnes, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MORRIS OIL CO., Defendant-Respondent. No. 27987. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. July 30, 2008. Petition for Rehearing and Transfer Denied August 22, 2008. Application for Transfer Denied September 30, 2008.

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 20th day of February 2006 by Defendant (Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day

84 Cal.Rptr.2d 634 (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1473 James BARNES, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Thomas A. BLACK, Individually and as Trustee, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D027743. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. May 11, 1999. *635 Finkelstein & Finkelstein, Norma

623 S.E.2d 617 (2006) AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and Robert Forquer, Substitute Trustee, Plaintiffs v. Timothy H. BARNES, Lori A. Barnes, and Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants. No. COA05-478. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. January 3, 2006. Robertson, Haworth & Reese, P.L.L.C., by Christopher C. Finan and Alan

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal and cross-appeal involve the remedial aspects (reinstatement and back-pay) of litigation previously before us. An understanding of the issues now before us requires a review of the history of this case. In Barnes v. Bosley, 568 F.Supp. 1406 (E.D.Mo.1983), the District Court held that plaintiff Shirley Barnes’s discharge on January 3,1983 from her position as a Unit Manager I in the

DECISION PER CURIAM. Shirley M. Barnes petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) that sustained the action of the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA” or “agency”) removing her from her position for conduct prejudicial to the government. Barnes v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, No. DC-0752-00-0393-I-1, 2001 WL 219359. We affirm,.