Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Shirley Allene Albright”
Harris County Flood Control District v. Adampublic domain
988 S.W.2d 423 (1999) HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, Texas Department of Transportation, and Brazoria Drainage District No. 4, Appellants, v. Doyle ADAM, Wanda Adam, Patricia Ann Adams, Fernando R. Aguilar, Carolyn S. Aguilar, Charles Aiken, Julieann Aiken, Ronald E. Alford, Joann Alford, Kenneth Allen, Monzelle Allen, Antonio Almaguer, Linda Almaguer, Jose A. Alvarez, Derward L. Amacker, Donna R. Amacker, Rodolfo Aparicio, Dianna Aparicio
Green v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Presently pending and ready for resolution in this consumer lending action is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (ECF No. 25). The issues are fully briefed and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, no hearing being deemed necessary. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion will be granted.
McDaniel v. West Virginia Division of Laborpublic domain
591 S.E.2d 277 (2003) 214 W.Va. 719 Larry McDANIEL, Petitioner Below, Appellee, v. WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF LABOR, Respondent Below, Appellant. L. Dean Schwartz and Michael Johnston, Petitioners Below, Appellees, v. West Virginia Division of Labor, Respondent Below, Appellant. Nos. 31272, 31273. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Sub
State v. Angelica C. Nelsonpublic domain
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 61. (dissenting). The record is clear in the instant case that the defendant wanted to testify. Although the right to testify is personal to the defendant and belongs exclusively to the defendant, the defendant both personally and through counsel (who advised the defendant against testifying) unequivocally asserted that she wanted to testify. ¶ 62. By prohibiting the defen
Bruffey Contracting Co., Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.public domain
522 F.Supp. 769 (1981) BRUFFEY CONTRACTING CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. BURROUGHS CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. No. J-79-58. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 28, 1981. *770 Murray L. Deutchman, Rockville, Md., for plaintiff. Ralph N. Albright, Jr., Avis E. Black, Washington, D. C., for defendant. <
07/31/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 9, 2024 Session IN RE ESTATE OF BILLY F. HAWK JR. ET AL. v. CHAMBLISS, BAHNER & STOPHEL P.C. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 20C350 Robert E. Lee Davies, Senior Judge
Jones-Lee v. Arkansas Department of Human Servicespublic domain
316 S.W.3d 261 (2009) 2009 Ark. App. 160 Eurana JONES-LEE, Appellant, v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee. No. CA 08-1008. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. March 4, 2009. *263 Robertson Law Firm, PLLC, by: Bonnie Robertson, North Little Rock, for appellant. Gray Allen Turner, Office of C
City of Dallas v. Saucedo-Fallspublic domain
268 S.W.3d 653 (2008) CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant v. Dora SAUCEDO-FALLS, Brigitte Gassaway, Shirley Gray, John Martinez, Troy McClain, Mona Neill, Floyd Simpson, William Turnage, Cynthia Villareal, Ron Waldrop, Thomas Tanksley, Michael Pruitt, and Larry Anderson, Appellees. No. 05-08-00029-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 18, 2008. Rehearing Overrule
State v. Thierfelderpublic domain
174 Wis.2d 213 (1993) 495 N.W.2d 669 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret E. THIERFELDER, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner. No. 91-0942-CR. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument January 7, 1993. Decided February 24, 1993. *214 For the defendant-respondent-petitioner ther
State v. Gary F. Lembergerpublic domain
2017 WI 39 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP1452-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gary F. Lemberger, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
Allen v. Allen Water & Wastewater Engineering, Inc.public domain
549 N.W.2d 516 (1996) Sandra Kay ALLEN, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Thomas F. Allen, Appellant, v. ALLEN WATER AND WASTEWATER ENGINEERING, INC., and Kemper Insurance Company, Appellees. No. 94-1376. Supreme Court of Iowa. June 19, 1996. Roger W. Stone of Simmons, Perrine, Albright & Ellwood, P.L.C., Cedar Rapids, for appellant.
City of Middletown v. Campbellpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 413 Defendant-appellant, Shirley Campbell, appeals her convictions in Middletown Municipal Court for vehicular homicide and failure to discharge children to a place of safety. We affirm. On September 14, 1989, appellant was driving a school bus on which seven-year-old Christina Case was a passenger. She stopped
Roberts v. SENTRY LIFE INSURANCEpublic domain
90 Cal.Rptr.2d 408 (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 375 Alan ROBERTS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SENTRY LIFE INSURANCE et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B125515. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven. November 22, 1999. Rehearing Denied December 13, 1999. Review Denied February 16, 2000.
Weir v. Fadapublic domain
123 F.3d 281 Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23937XJames E. WEIR, Individually and as Representatives of aClass of all Former Employees of the Dallas Office of theFederal Asset Disposition Association ("FADA"); WilliamFerguson, Individually and as Representatives of a Class ofall Former Employees of the Dallas Office of the FederalAsset Disposition Association ("FADA"); Pamela Bender,Individually and as Representatives of a C
Ahrens v. Town of Fultonpublic domain
251 Wis.2d 135 (2002) 2002 WI 29 641 N.W.2d 423 Richard AHRENS, Shirley Ahrens, Robert Albright, Shirley Albright, Barbara Allen, Nicholas Allen, Dolores Allen, June Ann Amell, Arnold Anderson, Loraine Anderson, John Augustyniak, Margaret Augustyniak, Milton Bates, Helen Bates, Robert Bauer, Gail Bauer, David Bear, Karen Bear, Michael Bellettiere, Pat Bellettiere, Otto Benz, Glen Black, Melaine Black, Edwar
Wood v. Brian Harris Autoplexpublic domain
923 So.2d 17 (2005) Jon M. WOOD v. BRIAN HARRIS AUTOPLEX. No. 2004 CA 1316. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. August 3, 2005. *19 Ben E. Clayton, Slidell, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellant Jon M. Wood. Stephen W. Brooks, Jr., Shannon K. Lowry, Richard J. Voelker, Covington, Counsel for Defendant/Appellee Brian Har
ORDER This matter originated in this Court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “Commission”) pursuant to Gov. Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (A)(1)(b) and Div. (A)(2)(d). The Commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys and judges, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the applicable continuing legal education provisions of Gov. Bar R. X and Gov. J
Jaghory v. New York State Department Of Educationpublic domain
131 F.3d 326 Zia JAGHORY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Thomas Sobel,Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, in hisofficial and individual capacity, Regents of the Universityof the State of New York, R. Carlos Carballada, individuallyand in his official capacity as Chancellor of the Universityof the State of New York, Jorge L. Batista, Shirley C.Brown, Walter Cooper, Willar
Ahrens v. Town of Fultonpublic domain
240 Wis.2d 124 (2000) 2000 WI App 268 621 N.W.2d 643 Richard AHRENS, Shirley Ahrens, Robert Albright, Shirley Albright, Barbara Allen, Nicholas Allen, Dolores Allen, June Ann Amell, Arnold Anderson, Loraine Anderson, John Augustyniak, Margaret Augustyniak, Milton Bates, Helen Bates, Robert Bauer, Gail Bauer, David Bear, Karen Bear, Michael Bellettiere, Pat Bellettiere, Otto Benz, Glen Black, Melaine Black,
State v. James Elvin Lagronepublic domain
2016 WI 26 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP1424-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James Elvin Lagrone, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. A REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS OPINION FILE