Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sherry A Sutherland”
Sherry Lewis v. GEICOpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 22-3449 ______________ SHERRY LEWIS; DAVID V. LEWIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant ________________ On Appeal from the
State v. Sutherlandpublic domain
266 S.W.3d 343 (2008) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Carl S. SUTHERLAND, Appellant. No. ED 90622. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. October 21, 2008. *344 Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anna L. Bunch, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Jesse Thomas Sutherland v. Statepublic domain
OPINION MACKEY K. HANCOCK, Justice. Appellant, Jesse Thomas Sutherland, appeals his conviction for felony driving *31 while intoxicated 1 and the resulting imposition of a negotiated five-year term of community supervis
Sutherland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.public domain
632 F.3d 990 (2011) Maria Tara SUTHERLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-2214. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 2, 2010. Decided January 21, 2011. *991 Kathleen M. Sweeney (argued), Schembs Sweeney Law, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-App
People v. Sutherlandpublic domain
860 N.E.2d 178 (2006) 223 Ill.2d 187 307 Ill.Dec. 524 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Cecil S. SUTHERLAND, Appellant. No. 99047. Supreme Court of Illinois. September 21, 2006. As Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing December 4, 2006. *189 John Paul Ca
People v. Sutherlandpublic domain
JUSTICE MILLER, dissenting: The defendant raises a number of contentions in this post-conviction appeal, but the majority considers only two matters, which concern allegations that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain evidence at trial. The post-conviction judge rejected these claims after an evidentiary
People v. Sutherlandpublic domain
Docket No. 99047. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. CECIL S. SUTHERLAND, Appellant. Opinion filed September 21, 2006.–Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing December 4, 2006. JUSTICE FITZGERALD delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Fr
People v. Sutherlandpublic domain
Docket No. 85982–Agenda 2–May 2000. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. CECIL SUTHERLAND, Appellant. Opinion filed November 16, 2000. JUSTICE HEIPLE delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, Cecil Sutherland, appeals from the denial of his post-conviction petition after an evidentiary hearing in the circuit court of Jefferson County. Because defendant has been senten
Sutherlund Ex Rel. Sutherland v. Pellpublic domain
738 So.2d 1016 (1999) Calie Nicole SUTHERLAND, a minor, by her parents and next friends, Sherri SUTHERLAND and Douglas Sutherland, Appellant, v. Edward L. PELL, Appellee. No. 98-03372. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. August 11, 1999. *1017 Gwynne A. Young and Eric S. Adams of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel,
SMITH, Circuit Judge. Lonnie Weston and Sherry Woodard appeal their convictions for the manufacture, possession, and distribution of methamphetamine. Weston challenges the legality under the Fourth Amendment of two searches of his home. In addition, Weston requests that the district court’s alternative sentence be imposed in light of United States v. Booker, 54
Hardin v. Sutherlandpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 475 This is an action for personal injury and property damage. On the fifth day of July, 1926, at the hour of about 5 o'clock in the afternoon, appellant was riding in an automobile belonging to the Los Angeles Building Trades Council, and which was being driven by her husband, Collins Hardin, in a northerly direction
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 915 Syllabus by the Court 1. Three juveniles who were subjected to a "felony stop," handcuffed and transported to police station, where they were booked *Page 916 and two were placed in holding cells, were in custody for purposes of Mi
SHERRY H. v. Probate Courtpublic domain
177 Conn. 93 (1979) SHERRY H. v. PROBATE COURT Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued November 8, 1978. Decision released March 20, 1979. COTTER, C. J., LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, LONGO and PETERS, JS. *94 David Bixby, law student intern, under the supervision of Stephen Wizner, with whom, on the brief, were Edwar
222 F.3d 488 (8th Cir. 2000) RICH LEMONDS; RICH HALBMAN, PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS,v.ST. LOUIS COUNTY, A COUNTY HAVING A CHARTER FORM OF GOVERNMENT; CITY OF PEERLESS PARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; DUDLEY MCCARTER, TRUSTEE FOR THE CITY OF PEERLESS PARK; BLANCHE SUTHERLAND, DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES,DONNA ASBERRY; JOHN ASBERRY; LISA CHAMBERS; MARY CORBETT; KEVIN GRADY; ELISABETH KREMINSKI; FRANK KREMINSKI; MIKE MCCOLE; SUSAN MCCOLE; GREG LASKY; JO
ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, ETC. VS. CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC (L-2044-17, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)public domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1344-20 ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, by and through BRIAN BURNS, EXECUTOR, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, June 15, 2021 APP
Affirm and Opinion Filed August 31, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00340-CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.E.J., L.S.J., AND D.M.J., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-19493
Bailey v. Fulwoodpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. On October 13, 2011, Shavonne Bailey (“petitioner”) filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 1 The Court issued an order to show cause on March 2, 2012, and the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) filed its response on
Mattan v. Obamapublic domain
618 F.Supp.2d 24 (2009) Mohammed Abdullah Taha MATTAN, et al., Petitioners, v. Barack OBAMA, et al., Respondents. Civil Action No. 09-745 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 21, 2009. *25 Gordon Samuel Woodward, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP, Washington, DC, Rebecca Y. Starr, William T. Hangl
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
Darden v. U. S. Parole Commissionpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on William A. Darden’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons discussed below, the petition will be denied. I. BACKGROUND On December 5, 1991, in the Superior Court of the Distri