Cases

WALLACE, Judge. Petition granted; order quashed. See State v. Rygwelski, 899 So.2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA2005). NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Re: Dkt. No. 52 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants move to compel arbitration and to dismiss or stay the action, arguing that Sanders’ claims against Defendants are subject to an arbitration clause signed by Sanders and Swift and therefore must be resolved through arbitration. Dkt. No. 52. Sanders opposes the

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts II through III.B.1. and III.B.3. OPINION I. INTRODUCTION After a consolidated trial, defendants Ricky Sanders (Sanders) and Andre Donovan Sheppard (Sheppard) were found guilty of first degree murder (Pen. Code, §

ORDER MUIRHEAD, United States Magistrate Judge. The plaintiffs have moved for sanctions against the defendants and/or their counsel, William Edward Whittington, IV (“Whittington”), as a result of alleged discovery abuses in this matter and allegedly improper litigation tactics in the related case of Aubin v. River Valley Fitness One L.P., et al., Civil No. 00-110-B (“Aubin”),

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-19,359-24 EX PARTE CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD JR., Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 48429-B-9 IN THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT FROM WICHITA COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Ar

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 19-4776 WILLIAM SHEPPARD , APPELLANT, V. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided March 15, 20

Case: 15-31114 Document: 283-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 15-31114 March 27, 2025

People v Sanders (2020 NY Slip Op 04203) People v Sanders 2020 NY Slip Op 04203 Decided on July 23, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

968 P.2d 612 (1998) 192 Ariz. 539 Daniel SHEPPARD, individually, and as next best friend of Tarik Sheppard, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CROW-BARKER-PAUL NO. 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Texas limited partnership, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 97-0394. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. July 14, 1998. Review Denied

Saris, C.J. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Kimberly Sheppard was fired by Defendant 265 Essex Street Operating Company, LLC ("Essex") on January 5, 2015. She brought this action against Essex, two of her former supervisors, Frank Silvia and Beth Fearon, and HealthBridge Management Company.1 See Docket No. 8 at 1. In her original complaint, Shep

604 F.Supp.2d 1003 (2009) Bobby T. SHEPPARD, Petitioner, v. Margaret BAGLEY, Warden, Respondent. Case No. 1:00-cv-493. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 4, 2009. *1007 Carol Ann Wright, Melissa J. Callais, Steven Scott Nolder, Federal Public Defenders Office, Columbus, OH, for Petitioner. Cha

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18–1931 FELICIA SANDERS, individually and as Legal Custodian for K.M., a minor, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee, ––––––––––––––––– BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, Amicus Supporting Appellant

231 Ga. 223 (1973) 200 S.E.2d 877 JONES et al. v. SHEPPARD. 28211. Supreme Court of Georgia. Submitted September 11, 1973. Decided October 5, 1973. *224 Anderson & Sanders, Cohen Anderson, Lanier & Lanier, Robert S. Lanier, for appellants. Allen, Edenfield, Brown &

*72OPINION OF THE COURT Crane, J. This is an action, inter alia, to recover damages for alleged multiple acts of medical malpractice perpetrated upon the plaintiff Karen Sheppard (hereinafter the mother) and her then unborn child, the infant plaintiff, Jo’ell Sheppard-Mobley. In July 1999 the mother sought treatment for abdominal dis

268 So.2d 590 (1972) 263 La. 379 STATE of Louisiana v. Earnest SHEPPARD. No. 51815. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 1, 1972. On Rehearing November 6, 1972. *591 Kramer & Kennedy, Ralph W. Kennedy, Jr., Alexandria, for defendant-appellant. Jack P. F. Gremillion, William J. Guste,

668 F.3d 1298 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter SANDERS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-13667. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. February 2, 2012. *1300 Lisa Wilson Tarvin, Rodney D. Bullard, George Jeffrey Viscomi, Asst. U.S. Attys., Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, Bret R. Williams, Sally Y

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-13667 FEBRUARY 2, 2012 ________________________

HALL, Judge, dissenting. ¶ 70 Rather than analyze this case from the perspective of whether the amendment prejudiced the defendant, the majority effectively holds that a criminal defendant’s entitlement to notice of the charged crime necessarily includes a right to pretrial notice of the precise theory upon which the state will rely at trial. This holding is contrary to well-established Arizona case law. S

646 So.2d 1130 (1994) STATE of Louisiana v. Robert SHEPPARD. No. 94-KH-694. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. November 16, 1994. *1131 Cesar Vazquez, Indigent Defender Bd., Parish of Jefferson, Gretna, for relator, Robert Sheppard. John M. Mamoulides and Terry M. Boudreaux, Dist. Attorney's Office, Gretna, for r

BOWES, Judge. The defendant, Robert Sheppard, pled guilty to one count of armed robbery and *1205was sentenced to ninety-nine years at hard labor. After a careful examination of the record in its entirety, we affirm. PROCEDURAL FACTS The underlying facts of defendant’s crime have been set out in State v. Sheppa