Cases

50 P.3d 1051 (2002) 137 Idaho 556 Mary-Claude MARGAIRAZ, fka Mary-Claude Siegel, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Shelly Martin SIEGEL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 27280. Court of Appeals of Idaho. June 24, 2002. *1052 Liesche, Reagan, Wallace & Wallace, P.A., Coeur d'Alene, for appellant. Kenneth P. Adler

MAJORITY OPINION J. HARVEY HUDSON, Justice. Appellant, Carolyn Ann Lesikar Moon, Individually and as Named Trustee of the Carolyn Ann Lesikar Moon Special Trust appeals the summary judgment granted in favor of appellees, Woody K. Lesikar, Individually, as Trustee of the Woodrow V. Lesikar Special Trust, and Independent Executor of the Estate of Woodrow V. Lesikar; West Houston Airport Corporation; Shelly

Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed July 10, 2007 Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed July 10, 2007. In The

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND; DENYING MOTION TO SEAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 44, 67, 77 Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge This action is an employment dispute between Plaintiff Lawanda Anderson and her employer, Defendant City and County of San Francisco (“CCSF”). Plaintiff asserts five claims for relief: feder

Laughlin, J.: - This is an action by a vendee of real- estate to enforce a lien for the amount paid on a contract for the purchase of the premises and for the expenses of examining the title after rejection of the title on the ground that it was unmarketable. The contract which is the basis of the action was made' between the parties to this action on the- 27th day of August, 1906. The premises are situate on the southerly s

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Tucker v. Soy Capital Bank & Trust Co., 2012 IL App (1st) 103303 Appellate Court JAMES C. TUCKER, BRIAN K. ADCOCK, SHELLY K. ADCOCK, Caption TERRY D. CAUSEY, JOHN W. FLORA, LISA S. FLORA, JANE F. LAWSON, JEFF A. LADD, BRENT R. LOCKE, JEFFREY D. SAMS, DANIEL T. TOUW, RON G. WEADE, and

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published

PER CURIAM. In these consolidated proceedings, we address an important question of criminal procedure involving significant interests of the defendants, prosecution, crime victims, and public, which has thus far received virtually no judicial attention: whether a pretrial order prohibiting victim-impact witnesses from attending the criminal prosecution in which they are slated t

[J-65-2022] [MO: Donohue, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT ALLEGHENY REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH : No. 26 MAP 2021 CENTER, ALLENTOWN WOMEN'S : CENTER, DELAWARE COUNTY : Appeal from the Orders of the WOMEN'S CENTER, PHILADELPHIA : Commonwealth Court at No. 26 MD WOMEN'S CENTER, PLANNED : 2019 dated January 28, 2020, and PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE, PLANNED : Mar

106 F.3d 325 65 USLW 2543, 97 CJ C.A.R. 196 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Timothy James McVEIGH; Terry Lynn Nichols, Defendants-Appellees.National Victims Center; Mothers Against Drunk Driving;The National Victims' Constitutional Amendment Network;Justice For Surviving Victims, Inc.; Concerns Of PoliceSurvivors, Inc.; Citizens For Law and Order, Inc.;Criminal Justice Leg

Greaney, J. The plaintiff, Arthur S. Demoulas, commenced a shareholder derivative action on behalf of Demoulas Super Markets, Inc. (DSM), and Valley Properties, Inc. (Valley), against the defendants, alleging that the defendants had wrongfully, and in breach of fiduciary duties, usurped corporate opportunities that should have been presented to DSM and Valley. A Superior Court judge sitting without a jury presided over a complex

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

ORDER GRANTING SHAREHOLDER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A STAY MARTIN GLENN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court are the following motions (collectively, the “Motions”): (i) Shareholder Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for a Stay (the “Fund 1 Motion,” Adv. Pro. No. 10-04609, ECF Doc. #2387) and (ii) Shareholder De

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

Opinion ARABIAN, J. Defendant Jeffrey Dean Wash was convicted by a jury of the first degree murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 189),1 rape (§ 261, former subd. (2)) and robbery (§211) of Erin King, as well as the first degree murder and robbery of Shelly Siegel, and two counts of burglary (§ 459). The jury also found true the special circumstan

999 F.Supp. 317 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Adele SCHMITT, John Schmitt and Adam Schmitt d/b/a Channel Marine Suzucki and Schmitt's Marina, and Carl Mednica, individually and as President of Cave Diggers, Inc., and Adam Schmitt d/b/a Adams Fishing Station, Defendants. John SCHMITT and Adam Schmitt, d/b/a Channel Marine Suzucki and Channel Marine Sales, Inc. known as Schmitt's Marina, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. The C

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201