Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Shellie M. Williams”
McClendon v. Williamspublic domain
STEWART, J. _JjP & S Surgery Center, L.L.C. (“P & S”), a defendant in this medical malpractice action, sought supervisory review of the trial court’s denial of a motion for summary judgment. We granted the writ and ordered the matter briefed and docketed. Because the plaintiffs will be unable to meet the burden of proving causation, an essential element of their claim, we find that summary judgment dismissing the plain
Williams v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.public domain
OPINION IRENAS, Senior District Judge: These two lawsuits, having been removed from the Superior Court of New Jersey by Defendants Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., come before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motions to Remand. Because the motions raise the same question of law and have highly similar factual circumstances, the Court considers them together for purposes of efficiency. I
J.M. ex rel. V.M. v. Baileypublic domain
KING, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. J.M., a minor child, by and through her mother, V.M., filed suit against the Holmes County School District (school district) and several school district officials, alleging various claims that include failure to report sexual abuse, negligent hiring, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Holmes County Circuit Court granted summary judgment in favor of the school district and its
Tran v. Williamspublic domain
SAUNDERS, Judge. 11 This is a case of a discharged attorney filing an intervention seeking attorney’s fees earned after the case of the underlying plaintiffs was settled subsequent to her discharge. Over the course of their claim, plaintiffs’ first hired the discharged attorney, then an attorney who eventually could no longer handle their case due to his election to an office that disallowed him to retain their case, and, fi
Anita J. Howard v. Shelly R. Svoboda, M.D.public domain
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0896 Court of Appeals Lillehaug, J. Dissenting, Gildea, C.J. Took no part, Anderson, J. Anita J. Howard, Appellant, vs.
Anita J. Howard v. Shelly R. Svoboda, M.D.public domain
OPINION REYES, Judge. This appeal arises out of a medical-malpractice suit and a district court protective order limiting the scope of an “informal discussion” with a treating physician authorized under Minn.Stat. § 595.02, subd. 5. Appellants challenge the order, arguing that the district court erred in interpreting the statute to prevent them from aski
Williams v. Carterpublic domain
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge. The plaintiff, a former inmate at the Poin-sett County, Arkansas, Jail, appeals the District Court’s judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. Larry D. Williams contends that the defendants, including Jimmy Carter, the Poinsett County Sheriff, and Gene Henderson, the jail supervisor, maintained the jail in an unconstitutional manner. Before the hearing, Williams requested appointed counsel, but
State of Tennessee v. Steve M. Jarmanpublic domain
07/06/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 19, 2019 Session1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STEVE M. JARMAN Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals Circuit Court for Dickson County No. 2015-CR-585 Larr
People v. Williamspublic domain
73 N.Y.2d 84 (1989) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donna Williams, Michael P. Barrett, Martin Williams, Also Known as Marty Williams, Shelly J. McClure, Also Known as Shelly Jo McClure, Jeffrey J. Snyder and Robert A. Becher, Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued January 4, 1989. Decided February 14, 1989. Dennis Schle
Matter of Sasha R. (Kevin A. M.)public domain
Matter of Sasha R. (Kevin A. M.) (2023 NY Slip Op 02882) Matter of Sasha R. (Kevin A. M.) 2023 NY Slip Op 02882 Decided on May 31, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic
McClendon v. Williamspublic domain
In re McClendon, Johnny; McClendon, Shelly; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Oua-chita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 062269, Alvin R. Sharp, J.; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,-577-CW. *1271Granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed. Case is remanded to trial court for further proceedings.
In Re: James M. Daileypublic domain
Case: 19-15145 Date Filed: 01/30/2020 Page: 1 of 29 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-15145-P ________________________ IN RE: JAMES DAILEY,
In Re Franklinpublic domain
343 B.R. 815 (2006) In re: Carl William FRANKLIN Shelly Marie Nichols-Franklin, Debtors. No. 04-1959. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia. April 13, 2006. Aaron C. Amore, Charles Town, WV, for Debtors. MEMORANDUM OPINION PATRICK M. FLATLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. Carl William Franklin and Shelly Marie Nichols-Franklin (the "Debtors")
In Re: James M. Daileypublic domain
Case: 19-15145 Date Filed: 01/30/2020 Page: 1 of 29 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-15145-P ________________________ IN RE: JAMES DAILEY,
Doga v. Team Industrial Services, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM.* In its brief, appellee Team Industrial Services, Inc., accurately calls to our attention that we have no appellate jurisdiction, because the district court has not entered a judgment that disposes of all claims against all parties. An order granting a new trial is not a final, appealable order. Evers v. Equifax, Inc., 650 F.2d 793, 796 (5th Cir. Unit B July 1981). The orders g
Lawrence William Shelly v. Perry M. Johnson, Jack Bergman, Marjorie Vanochten, William O'connor, and Jerry Shermanpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Lawrence William Shelly appeals the grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan in favor of the defendants. Appellant, an inmate at the Michigan Intensive Program Center (MIPC) in Marquette, Michigan and in custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
Robert H. Hargrave v. Shellie McKinneypublic domain
413 F.2d 320 Robert H. HARGRAVE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Shellie McKINNEY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 27140. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. June 9, 1969. Glassie, Pewett, Beebe & Shanks, by Hershel Shanks, Allan I. Mendelsohn, Robert M. Perce, Jr., Washington, D.C., Frank & Gran
Pioneer v. Williams Cty. Bd. of Commrs.public domain
[Cite as Pioneer v. Williams Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2025-Ohio-497.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY Village of Pioneer, et al. Court of Appeals No. WM-24-007 Appellees Trial Court No. 23CI000129 v. Williams County Board of DECISION AND JUDGMEN
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-22-00355-CV SSC WIMBERLEY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC; Randall Morris; Bozena Mrozek; Calvin Boutte; SavaSeniorCare Administrative and Consulting, LLC; and SSC Equity Holdings MT, LLC, Appellants
In Re: D.M., W.P., and M.P.public domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED In re: D.M., W.P., and M.P. November 22, 2017 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK No. 17-0567 (Gilmer County 16-JA-31, 16-JA-32, & 16-JA-33) SUPREME