⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Sheldon v. F.W. Webb Company, alias”

Satten v. Webbpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2002-06-14 · Published · cited 17× · 121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 234; 99 Cal. App. 4th 365; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 6725; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5288; 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4278
121 Cal.Rptr.2d 234 (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 365 Dorothy SATTEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Patrick D. WEBB et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D037375. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. June 14, 2002. Rehearing Denied July 9, 2002. Review Denied October 2, 2002.[*]
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001-05-15 · Published · cited 45× · 249 F.3d 1032
249 F.3d 1032 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Appalachian Power Company, et al., Petitionersv.Environmental Protection Agency, RespondentCommonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, et al., IntervenorsNo. 99-1200 Consolidated with 99-1205, 99-1206, 99-1246, 99-1266, 99-1285, 99-1289, 99-1291, 99-1292, 99-1293, 99-1295, 99-1299, 99-1300, 99-1301, 99-1303, 99-1304, 99-1306, 99-1307, 00-1013, 00-1021, 00-1022, 00-1024, 00
Connecticut Superior Court · 1997-01-08 · Published · cited 15× · 718 A.2d 1025; 45 Conn. Super. Ct. 408; 45 Conn. Supp. 408; 1997 Conn. Super. LEXIS 402
In this case, plaintiff Roncari Development Company (Roncari), has sued seven defendants,1 all persons or entities allegedly involved in the airport valet parking business in and around Bradley International Airport (Bradley Airport) from 1987 or earlier, until the date this case was commenced.2 The plaintiff *Page 410 seeks money damages and injunctive relief in connect
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-05-17 · Published · cited 19× · 35 F.4th 1
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1301 CENTRO DE PERIODISMO INVESTIGATIVO, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jay A. García-Gregory, U.S. Di
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017-09-30 · Published · cited 7× · 578 B.R. 325
MEMORANDUM OPINION M. Hannah Lauck, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Appellant Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC’s (“Mar-Bow”) appeal from several orders1 of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (the “Bankruptcy Court”), Appellee McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services US, LLC’s (“McKinsey”) Motion to Dismi
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-03-16 · Published · cited 16× · 694 F. Supp. 2d 259; 105 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1419; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25160; 2010 WL 938765
694 F.Supp.2d 259 (2010) ALTRIA GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 1:06-cv-09430-RJH-FM. United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 16, 2010. *262 Dan K. Webb, Julie A. Bauer, Winston & Strawn, LLP, Chicago, IL, Lewis S. Wiener, Victoria O'Connor, Clifford E. Muller, Daniel H. Schluete
District Court, E.D. New York · 1996-10-28 · Published · cited 13× · 946 F. Supp. 221; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20120; 1996 WL 635714
946 F.Supp. 221 (1996) SAFEGUARD INSURANCE CO. et alia, Plaintiffs, v. ANGEL GUARDIAN HOME, Defendant. CV-93-1805(CPS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 28, 1996. *222 *223 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SIFTON, Chief Judge. This is an action under an insuran
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 24× · 876 F.3d 63
SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign
California Court of Appeal · 2010-05-03 · Published · cited 49× · 184 Cal. App. 4th 313; 109 Cal. Rptr. 3d 143; 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 606
*320Opinion WILLHITE, Acting P. J. The Franklin Mint Company and its principals, Stewart and Lynda Resnick (collectively, Franklin Mint), appeal from a judgment dismissing their malicious prosecution action against the law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, and Attorney Mark S. Lee (collectively, Manatt). Manatt represented the executors of the est
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
15‐0690 Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2015 4 (Argued: June 8, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2017*) 5
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993-08-26 · Published · cited 141× · 995 F.2d 1566; 27 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1136; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4419; 93 Daily Journal DAR 7845; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21733; 1993 WL 196286
PLAGER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. ULSI has managed to take a shield the law provides to purchasers of products containing patented inventions and turn it into a sword to cut off the legitimate rights of the patent owner. While a wrong result in a particular case is always unfortunate, a wrong precedent in this particular context is a cause for concern, since it can only lead to even fu
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002-08-07 · Published · cited 7× · 218 F. Supp. 2d 1047; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14633; 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1079; 2002 WL 1880512
218 F.Supp.2d 1047 (2002) Kelli Rae WENSEL, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C01-3019-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. August 7, 2002. *1048 *1049 Michael Carroll, Coppola, Sandre, McConville & Carroll, PC, West Des
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003-06-20 · Published · cited 6× · 277 F. Supp. 2d 478; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12341; 2003 WL 21977097
277 F.Supp.2d 478 (2003) UNITED STATES of America v. UNION CORP.; Metal Bank of America; Irvin G. Schorsch, Jr.; and John B. Schorsch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York; Public Service Electric & Gas Co. of New Jersey; and Monsanto Co. No. CIV.A.9-01589. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 20, 2003. *47
United States Court of Federal Claims · 1994-04-29 · Published · cited 0× · 31 Fed. Cl. 464; 1994 U.S. Claims LEXIS 99; 1994 WL 220345
OPINION ON COMPENSATION BASE TURNER, Judge. Hughes Aircraft Company owns U.S. Patent No. 3,758,051, entitled “Velocity Control and Orientation of a Spin-Stabilized Body,” which describes an apparatus for controlling the attitude of a spin-stabilized spacecraft.1 Hughes brought this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, seeking just compensation for the unauthorized use or
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000-05-11 · Published · cited 65× · 763 So. 2d 162; 2000 Miss. LEXIS 114; 2000 WL 568418
763 So.2d 162 (2000) CITY OF MADISON v. Steve BRYAN. No. 97-CA-01205-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. May 11, 2000. Rehearing Denied July 20, 2000. John Hedglin, Madison, Attorney for Appellant. Steven H. Smith, Jackson, Attorney for Appellee. EN BANC. PRATHER, Chief Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. This case comes to this
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001-05-15 · Published · cited 2× · 249 F.3d 1032; 346 U.S. App. D.C. 38; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 9317
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. * *1036 PER CURIAM. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND.1036 A. Statutory Framework.1037 B. The NOx SIP Call.
California Court of Appeal · 1999-03-17 · Published · cited 35× · 83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 89; 70 Cal. App. 4th 911; 64 Cal. Comp. Cases 378; 99 Daily Journal DAR 2503; 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 210
83 Cal.Rptr.2d 89 (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 911 Joe NOTRICA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Defendant and Appellant. No. B097529. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four. March 17, 1999. Rehearing Denied April 13, 1999. Review Denied July 14, 1999.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006-05-25 · Published · cited 28× · 898 A.2d 590
898 A.2d 590 (2006) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, and Pennsylvania Department of State, v. UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, Certainteed Corporation, Courtaulds Aerospace, Inc., Chemrex, Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Advance Transformer Company, and Monsanto Company. Appeal of
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997-05-14 · Published · cited 20× · 113 F.3d 1327
113 F.3d 1327 Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 14,953Edith J. PARKS, Individually, Personal Representative of theEstate of Leslie E. Parks, Deceased and as parentand next friend of Kori J. Parksv.ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC.; The Warner & Swasey Company; TheGradall Company.Edith J. Parks, Individually, As Personal Representative ofthe Estate of Leslie E. Parks, Deceased, and asparent and next friend of Kori J. Parks, Appellant
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 97-CA-01205-SCT CITY OF MADISON v. STEVE BRYAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/28/1997 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN B. TONEY COURT FROM WHICH MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPEALED: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JOHN HEDGLIN ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: STEVEN H. SMITH NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - OTHER DISPOSI