Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sheldon v. F.W. Webb Company, alias”
Satten v. Webbpublic domain
121 Cal.Rptr.2d 234 (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 365 Dorothy SATTEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Patrick D. WEBB et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D037375. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. June 14, 2002. Rehearing Denied July 9, 2002. Review Denied October 2, 2002.[*]
249 F.3d 1032 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Appalachian Power Company, et al., Petitionersv.Environmental Protection Agency, RespondentCommonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, et al., IntervenorsNo. 99-1200 Consolidated with 99-1205, 99-1206, 99-1246, 99-1266, 99-1285, 99-1289, 99-1291, 99-1292, 99-1293, 99-1295, 99-1299, 99-1300, 99-1301, 99-1303, 99-1304, 99-1306, 99-1307, 00-1013, 00-1021, 00-1022, 00-1024, 00
Roncari Development Co. v. GMG Enterprises, Inc.public domain
In this case, plaintiff Roncari Development Company (Roncari), has sued seven defendants,1 all persons or entities allegedly involved in the airport valet parking business in and around Bradley International Airport (Bradley Airport) from 1987 or earlier, until the date this case was commenced.2 The plaintiff *Page 410 seeks money damages and injunctive relief in connect
Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc. v. FOMBpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1301 CENTRO DE PERIODISMO INVESTIGATIVO, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jay A. García-Gregory, U.S. Di
MEMORANDUM OPINION M. Hannah Lauck, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Appellant Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC’s (“Mar-Bow”) appeal from several orders1 of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (the “Bankruptcy Court”), Appellee McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services US, LLC’s (“McKinsey”) Motion to Dismi
Altria Group, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
694 F.Supp.2d 259 (2010) ALTRIA GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 1:06-cv-09430-RJH-FM. United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 16, 2010. *262 Dan K. Webb, Julie A. Bauer, Winston & Strawn, LLP, Chicago, IL, Lewis S. Wiener, Victoria O'Connor, Clifford E. Muller, Daniel H. Schluete
Safeguard Insurance v. Angel Guardian Homepublic domain
946 F.Supp. 221 (1996) SAFEGUARD INSURANCE CO. et alia, Plaintiffs, v. ANGEL GUARDIAN HOME, Defendant. CV-93-1805(CPS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 28, 1996. *222 *223 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SIFTON, Chief Judge. This is an action under an insuran
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign
Franklin Mint Co. v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPpublic domain
*320Opinion WILLHITE, Acting P. J. The Franklin Mint Company and its principals, Stewart and Lynda Resnick (collectively, Franklin Mint), appeal from a judgment dismissing their malicious prosecution action against the law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, and Attorney Mark S. Lee (collectively, Manatt). Manatt represented the executors of the est
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
15‐0690 Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2015 4 (Argued: June 8, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2017*) 5
Intel Corporation v. Ulsi System Technology, Inc.public domain
PLAGER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. ULSI has managed to take a shield the law provides to purchasers of products containing patented inventions and turn it into a sword to cut off the legitimate rights of the patent owner. While a wrong result in a particular case is always unfortunate, a wrong precedent in this particular context is a cause for concern, since it can only lead to even fu
Wensel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurancepublic domain
218 F.Supp.2d 1047 (2002) Kelli Rae WENSEL, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C01-3019-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. August 7, 2002. *1048 *1049 Michael Carroll, Coppola, Sandre, McConville & Carroll, PC, West Des
United States v. Union Corp.public domain
277 F.Supp.2d 478 (2003) UNITED STATES of America v. UNION CORP.; Metal Bank of America; Irvin G. Schorsch, Jr.; and John B. Schorsch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York; Public Service Electric & Gas Co. of New Jersey; and Monsanto Co. No. CIV.A.9-01589. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 20, 2003. *47
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION ON COMPENSATION BASE TURNER, Judge. Hughes Aircraft Company owns U.S. Patent No. 3,758,051, entitled “Velocity Control and Orientation of a Spin-Stabilized Body,” which describes an apparatus for controlling the attitude of a spin-stabilized spacecraft.1 Hughes brought this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, seeking just compensation for the unauthorized use or
City of Madison v. Bryanpublic domain
763 So.2d 162 (2000) CITY OF MADISON v. Steve BRYAN. No. 97-CA-01205-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. May 11, 2000. Rehearing Denied July 20, 2000. John Hedglin, Madison, Attorney for Appellant. Steven H. Smith, Jackson, Attorney for Appellee. EN BANC. PRATHER, Chief Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. This case comes to this
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. * *1036 PER CURIAM. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND.1036 A. Statutory Framework.1037 B. The NOx SIP Call.
Notrica v. State Compensation Insurance Fundpublic domain
83 Cal.Rptr.2d 89 (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 911 Joe NOTRICA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Defendant and Appellant. No. B097529. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four. March 17, 1999. Rehearing Denied April 13, 1999. Review Denied July 14, 1999.
DEPT. OF GEN. SERV. v. US Mineral Prod.public domain
898 A.2d 590 (2006) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, and Pennsylvania Department of State, v. UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, Certainteed Corporation, Courtaulds Aerospace, Inc., Chemrex, Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Advance Transformer Company, and Monsanto Company. Appeal of
Parks v. Alliedsignalpublic domain
113 F.3d 1327 Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 14,953Edith J. PARKS, Individually, Personal Representative of theEstate of Leslie E. Parks, Deceased and as parentand next friend of Kori J. Parksv.ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC.; The Warner & Swasey Company; TheGradall Company.Edith J. Parks, Individually, As Personal Representative ofthe Estate of Leslie E. Parks, Deceased, and asparent and next friend of Kori J. Parks, Appellant
City of Madison v. Steve Bryanpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 97-CA-01205-SCT CITY OF MADISON v. STEVE BRYAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/28/1997 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN B. TONEY COURT FROM WHICH MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPEALED: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JOHN HEDGLIN ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: STEVEN H. SMITH NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - OTHER DISPOSI