Cases

[Cite as State v. Sheldon, 2019-Ohio-4123.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 6-18-07 v. GERRICK ANTHONY SHELDON, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Hardin County Common Pleas Court Tri

Mikoll, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, *854entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for disability retirement benefits. Petitioner was employed by the Department of Health as a research scientist for 13 years. On November 8, 1

680 F.Supp. 46 (1988) Eunice McCALL, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON PUBLISHING CO., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 87-1736-OG. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 29, 1988. *47 Timothy Brown and James C. Harmon, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Wiley Branton, Washington, D.C., for defendant. MEMORAN

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Vicki Dempsey represented debtors in four bankruptcy cases before Central District of Illinois courts. In each case, Dempsey requested attorney’s fees in excess of $1,000, the Central District’s presumptive attorney’s fee limit for Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases. However, the bankruptcy court found that Dempsey failed to justify fees in excess of the $1,000 l

Deemer, J. (dissenting). — As I understand the record, the deceased, at the time he was injured, was not engaged in repairing an old block or signal system, but was employed to, and was, in fact, engaged in putting on new cross-arms upon the telegraph poles, for the purpose of installing an entirely new and independent automatic system, to replace the old hand system — a system which required new arms, wires, and new construction

PUTNAM, J. (dissenting). Irrespective of the question whether the articles of machinery which are the subject of the controversy in this action were, at the time of the execution of the mortgage, fixtures, and thus a part of the realty or personal property, we see no reason to doubt that by the terms of the mortgage they were conveyed to the mortgagee as security for the loan then made for $12,000. The machinery was attached to a

Mr. Chief Justice Vickers delivered the opinion of the court: On February 4, 1907, the city of Sterling passed an ordinance providing for the construction of the east end sewer system. A petition was thereafter filed praying that steps be taken to levy a special assessment to pay for such sewer system. The special assessment was levied and duly confirmed May 30,

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND.........................................................682 II. LEGAL STANDARD ....................................................683 A. Summary Judgment Standard.........................................683 B. The Applicable Law (Maritime Law).....

Sheldon, J.: This is a motion to discharge a rule to give an additional appeal bond in a larger sum. It is an appeal from the Appellate Court. The circuit court rendered a decree for $36,000. An appeal was taken to the Appellate Court, and the circuit court' required a bond of $40,000. That bond was given. The Appellate Court affirmed the decree. On appeal from the Appellate Court to this court an appeal

ERVIN, Justice (dissenting) : We were petitioned for a certiorari review of the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in Tiernan v. Sheldon, 191 So.2d 87, that adjudicated a second appeal in this case. The first appellate decision in this case was rendered by the District Court of Appeal, Second District, prior to the creation of the Fourth District Court of Appeal. See Sheldon v. Tiernan

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 330, 333, 336, and 341] YOUNG, District Judge.1 I. INTRODUCTION Patricia Ann Livingston, Deborah Selby, Douglas Livingston, and David Livingston (the “Plaintiffs”) bring this action for the wrongful death of Gerald Livingston (“Livingston”), allegedly caused by exposure to asbe

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 23, 2011 Session PATRICIA ANN GHO MASSEY v. GREGORY JOEL CASALS Direct Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County No. F7887 Herbert Lane, Special Judge No. W2010-00284-COA-R3-JV - Filed May 3, 2011 Appellant filed a motion to quash garnishment of his individual retirement accounts

334 B.R. 455 (2005) In re ALI PROPERTIES, INC., MJB Motels, Inc., Debtors. No. 03-10433. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas. August 3, 2005. *456 Keith Miles Aurzada, Akin Gump Strauss et al., Dallas, TX, Robert W. Challquist, Kansas Department of Revenue, Topeka, KS, Collin Dietiker, Independence, MO, Brian L. Friedman, Proskauer

Mr. Chief Justice Cartwright delivered the opinion of the court: The county collector of Whiteside county applied to the county court of said county, at the May term, 1908, for judgment against lands of the appellees and an order of sale for an unpaid assessment levied by the commissioners of Union Drainage District No. 5 of the towns of Montmorency and Coloma, in said county, a d

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

KELLER, J. This appeal arises from a medical malpractice action brought by the plaintiffs, Thomas and Roxanne Mahoney, both individually and on behalf of their minor child, Teaghan Mahoney (child), against the defendants, Lori Storch Smith and Bay Street Pediatrics, the professional corporation in which Dr. Storch Smith practiced. The plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Storch Smith was neglige

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and is AFFIRMED. In September 1999, plaintiff Raymond J. Mincone filed an amended complaint against defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, alleging that the New York State Legislature passed amendments to the State Constitution in 1949, 1962, and 1985, in violation of his right to due process. The Dis

PATTERSON, District Judge: Appellant New York City Employees’ Retirement System (“NYCERS”), joined by amicus curiae the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Inc. (“NACBA”), the State of New York, H. Carl McCall, Comptroller of the State of New York, and the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System (“NYSTRS”), appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (A

OPINION TERRY McCALL, Justice. The jury convicted Donald Schnidt of aggravated robbery. The trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for a term of sixteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a fine of $5,000. Appellant challenges his conviction in four issues. We affirm.