Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sheila C Bonner”
Hallock v. Bonnerpublic domain
(2008) Susan HALLOCK and Ferncliff Associates, Inc., doing business as Multimedia Technology Center, Plaintiffs, v. Robert C. BONNER, Richard Will, Dennis P. Harrison, Margaret M. Jordan, Thomas Virgilio, Unknown Agents of United States Customs and Treasury, Unknown Agents of United States Justice Department, Unknown Agents of United States Postal Service, Unknown Agents of United States Marshal Service, and John & Jane Doe 1-25, Defendants.<
Sheila T. Harper v. Lawrence Countypublic domain
FAY, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to determine whether the district court properly rescinded its order converting a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment. We must also determine whether the court properly denied Defendants qualified immunity. After reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, we AFFIRM IN P
Cox v. Howertonpublic domain
MELTON, Justice, concurring. While I concur in the majority’s holding, I write separately to emphasize that, under the facts of this case, the trial court soundly concluded that there was no reasonable probability that Cox would not have pled guilty and insisted on going to trial. Cox was indicted for four counts of aggravated child molestation, two counts of incest, and twenty-three counts of sexual
Waldock v. Rover Pipeline, L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Waldock v. Rover Pipeline, L.L.C., 2020-Ohio-3307.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY Thomas Waldock, Trustee of the Trust Court of Appeals No. WD-19-048 Agreement of Thomas A. Waldock, et al. Trial Court No. 2017-CV-0256 Appellants v. Rover Pipeline, LLC, et al
ACCEPTED 04-15-00534-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
Austin v. Howard Universitypublic domain
267 F.Supp.2d 22 (2003) Larry AUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01-1026(RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 2, 2003. *23 Steven C. Kahn, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, P.L.C., Washington, DC, for Larry Austin. Larry Austin, Washington, DC, pro se.
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENOR Andrew W. Hull Gregory F. Zoeller APPELLEES Alice M. Morical Attorney General of Indiana J. Lee McNeely Hoover Hull, LLP McNeely Stephenson Thopy & Indianapolis, Indiana Thomas M. Fisher Harrold Solicitor General
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER . DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Relators Ricia Johnson and Health Dimensions Rehabilitation, Inc. (“HDR”) (together, “Relators”) initiated this qui tam action, on behalf of the United States of America (the “Government”), against Defendants Golden Gate National Senior Care, L.L.C.; GGNSC Holdings, L.L.C; and GGNSC Wayzata
Brannon v. City of Tulsapublic domain
932 P.2d 44 (1996) Latricia BRANNON, Teresa Cole, Glendale Bonner, Shelonia Bonner, Connie Bastion, Mahlon Bastion, James Parson, Maxine Scott, Richard Scott, Ronald Miller, and Sheila Johnson, Appellants, v. CITY OF TULSA, Oklahoma, Appellee. No. 84257. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3. December 13, 1996. Michael C. Taylor, Stephen M. Grayless, Mi
Parker v. Shelmar Prop. Owner's Ass'n, Inc.public domain
GROSSHANS, J. *1220Sherrye Parker (Appellant) appeals a final summary judgment in favor of Shelmar Property Owner's Association, Inc. (Appellee). Concluding that material issues of fact remain regarding Appellee's duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. App
Parker v. Shelmar Prop. Owner's Ass'n, Inc.public domain
GROSSHANS, J. *1220Sherrye Parker (Appellant) appeals a final summary judgment in favor of Shelmar Property Owner's Association, Inc. (Appellee). Concluding that material issues of fact remain regarding Appellee's duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. App
Frederick Renee Ruffin v. Antoine Maurice Robertspublic domain
BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge: Appellant Frederick Renee Ruffin challenges a Consent Custody Order awarding sole legal and physical custody of her biological son, A.R., to the child’s biological father, appellee Antoine Maurice Roberts. Ruffin claims that the trial court issued the order without her consent. Alternatively, she argues that the trial court erred in determining
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT McKesson to make its 30(b)(6) WITNESS AVAILABLE AND PRODUCE IMS DATA (# 185) COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge. The duly-noticed hearing on the plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel McKesson [Corporation]1 to Make its 30(b)(6) Witness Available and Produce IMS Data (# 185) was scheduled to occur at 11:30 A.M. on April 6,
Kardell v. Ackerpublic domain
OPINION Opinion by: Patricia 0. Alvarez, Justice Patricia Jo Kardell, Martin Murphy Snowden, Mickey Darrell Snowden, and Mary Delilla Snowden (Snowden Heirs) appeal the trial court’s judgment declaring that Edwin V. Acker Jr,, Stephen Adolph Acker, Elaine Acker George, Sheila Acker (Reinke) Bonner, and Edwin Scott Acker (Acker Heirs) “own an undivided non-participating one-fifth of the who
Janice Stough and Sheila H. Sasser v. Crenshaw County Board of Education: John Rex Sport, Etc.public domain
*1480 LEWIS R. MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge: The Crenshaw County Board of Education, the defendant below, adopted a patronage policy in 1976 which prohibits board employees from sending their children to private schools. Janice Stough and Sheila Sasser, the plaintiffs, are tenured teachers employed by
ACCEPTED 04-15-00534-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/18/2015 4:46:17 PM
602 F.Supp.2d 277 (2009) NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FIRST DATABANK, INC. and McKesson Corporation, Defendants. District Council 37 Health and Security Plan, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Medi-Span, a division of Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 05-11148-PBS, 07-10988-PBS. United States D
415 F.3d 994 In re Stanley Kirk BURRELL, dba/ Bustin' Publishing, aka/M.C. Hammer; In re Stephanie Darlene Burrell, aka/Bustin' Publishing, Debtors,Felton Pilate, dba/Felstar Music; Felster Publishing, Appellants,v.Stanley Kirk Burrell, aka/M.C. Hammer, Hammer, dba/Bustin' Publishing; Stephanie Darlene Burrell, individually and as business associates of unknown character, Appellees. No. 02-16466.
Orantes-Hernandez v. Meesepublic domain
685 F.Supp. 1488 (1988) Crosby Wilfredo ORANTES-HERNANDEZ, Organizacion De Professionales Y Tecnicos Salvadorenos, Casa El Salvador-Farabundo Marti; Salvadoran American Professional Association; Concilio Manzo; Central American Refugee Program; El Rescate; Marta Ester Paniagua-Vides; Jose Sanchez Flores; Dora Alicia Ayala De Castillo; Adelso Salome Flores; Uvaldo Aguilar; Dora Elia Estrada; Juan Francisco Perez-Cruz; Jose Adilman Barahona; Ana Estela Gue
Albers v. Lyonpublic domain
[Cite as Albers v. Lyon, 2026-Ohio-209.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO JAMES ALBERS, : APPEAL NO. C-250017 TRIAL NO. A-1903421 FRIEDA AARON, : PATRICIA ADAMS, : JUDGMENT ENTRY MICHELLE AGEE,