Cases

ORDER GRANTING MARS INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION That children and forced laborers pick cocoa beans,on a daily basis is indisputably an international tragedy. The debatable question is whether defendants Mars, Inc., and Mars Chocolate North America, LLC, must inform consumers at the point of sale that Mars choc

*956ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 16 JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION “The use of child slave labor in the Ivory Coast is a humanitarian tragedy.” Doe I v. Nestle USA, Inc., 766 F.3d 1013, 1016 (9th Cir.2014), The fact that major international corporations source ing

647 F.Supp.2d 1014 (2009) Shelly MAYDEN, Plaintiff v. SUPERIOR AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., Defendant. Cause No. 2:07-CV-311 RM. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. July 10, 2009. *1016 Amy F. Debrota, The Debrota Law Firm LLC, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff. Jeffrey H. Lipe, Jordan D. Shea, Williams

928 F.Supp. 1339 (1996) INTERFAITH COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-2097 (AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 25, 1996. *1340 *1341 Bruce J. Terris, Carolyn Smith Pravlik, Eric A. Bilsky, Terris, Pra

McKEE, Circuit Judge. Wedgewood Village Pharmacy appeals the District Court’s order affirming the Magistrate Judge’s denial of Wedgewood’s motion to quash an administrative warrant issued to agents of the Food and Drug Administration. Wedgewood argues that it is exempt from FDA inspection under provisions of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FDCA”), 21 U.S.C. § 301

ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 42) MASTROIANNI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. I. Introduction Glorena B. Consedine (“Plaintiff’) brings this employment discrimination ac*256tion against Willimansett East SNF (“Willimansett East” or “Defendant”), her former emp

HOWARD, Chief Judge, Plaintiff Raymond Murray sued his former employer Warren Pumps, LLC and its parent company Colfax Americas, claiming that their actions toward him violated the Americans with Disabilities. Act (“ADA”) and its Massachusetts analog. 42 U.S.C. §§ 12112(a), (b)(5)(A); M.G.L. ch. 151B, § 4(16). He also- asserted a state common law claim that he had been terminate

Re: Dkt. No. 122 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge This lawsuit arises out of Defendant Trans Union, LLC’s identification of Plaintiff Sergio L. Ramirez as potentially matching the name of a person on the United States government’s list of terrorists, drag traffickers, and others with w

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. Named Plaintiffs Devi Khoday and Denise Townsend bring this class action against Defendants Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”) and Digital River, Inc. (“Digital River”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for misrepresentations the Plaintiffs allege Defendants, made in connection with the sale of download insurance between 2005 and 2011. The

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 22 JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION “The use of child slave labor in the Ivory Coast is a humanitarian tragedy.” Doe I v. Nestle USA Inc., 766 F.3d 1013, 1016 (9th Cir.2014). The fact that major international corporations source ingredients for their products from supply chains involving s

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION LARRY ALAN BURNS, District Judge. The Court previously stayed this case pending the appeal of the denial of class certification in O’Shea v. Epson America, Inc., Case No. 9-CV-8063 (C.D.Cal.). It expected that on appeal the Ninth Circuit would confront and resolve a question that has become a kind of spike strip in the class certification o

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Sanjeev Lath v. Civil No. 16-cv-534-LM Opinion No. 2018 DNH 075 City of Manchester, NH; Gerard Dufresne; BMS Cat; and Amica Mutual Insurance Company O R D E R Before the court is Sanjeev Lath’s motion for leave to amend his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) to add a claim for de

People v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 04756) People v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 04756 Decided on August 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department MOULTON, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-1-2005 Wedgewood Village v. USA Precedential or Non-Pr

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Sanjeev Lath v. Civil No. 16-cv-463-LM Opinion No. 2018 DNH 013 Oak Brook Condominium Owners’ Association, Gerard Dufresne, and Betty Mullen AMENDED ORDER1 In document no. 152, the court gave Sanjeev Lath permission to file a motion for leave to amend his complaint to add two new claims aga

586 F.Supp. 1289 (1984) Andrew COLSON and Huston Lumber & Supply Co., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Lyle E. BERTSCH, Defendant. Lyle E. BERTSCH, Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Andrew COLSON, Counterclaim Defendant, and Major Pool Equipment Corp., et al., Additional Defendants on Counterclaims. Civ. A. No. 82-3640. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. May 8, 1

545 U.S. 469 (2005) KELO ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW LONDON ET AL. No. 04-108. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 22, 2005. Decided June 23, 2005. *470 Scott G. Bullock argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were William H. Mellor, Dana Berliner, and Scott W. Sawyer.<

736 F.Supp. 387 (1990) William C. HAYS, Executor of the Estate of Arthur Groves, Plaintiff, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 87-1089-WF. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 10, 1990. *388 Robert F. Corliss, Corliss & Romero, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff. Robert M. Gault, H. Joseph Hameli