Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Shawn Hamilton”
Bryan Avants v. Shawn Hamiltonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00129-COA BRYAN AVANTS APPELLANT v. SHAWN HAMILTON APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/24/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEBBRA K. HALFORD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: PIKE COUNTY CHANCERY COU
Mark Shawn Hamilton v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-16-00186-CR __________________
Shawn Kenneth Hamilton v. The State of Wyomingpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 89 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2023 September 8, 2023 SHAWN KENNETH HAMILTON, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-23-0068 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff).
Shawn Shannon v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1108 SHAWN SHANNON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Shawn T. Slaughter v. Grover T. Millspublic domain
12/19/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 16, 2018 Session SHAWN T. SLAUGHTER V. GROVER T. MILLS ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 11-C-434 Jeff Hollingsworth, Judge ___________
Hamilton v. Millerpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Lippman. We hold that, in these personal injury actions, it was an abuse of discretion to order plaintiffs to produce, prior to the defense *598medical examinations, medical reports detailing a diagnosis of each injury alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs and causally relating those injuries to plaintiffs’ expo
United States v. Shawn Serfasspublic domain
WIENER, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Shawn Daniel Serfass pleaded guilty to possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court applied a two-level sentencing enhancement under United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 201.1(b)(5) 1 based on the
Hamilton v. Holderpublic domain
584 F.3d 1284 (2009) Shawn James HAMILTON, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent. No. 09-9505. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. October 27, 2009. Submitted on the briefs:[*] Yalila Guerrero, Houston, TX, for Petitioner. Anh-Thu P. Mai-Windle, Senior Litigation Counsel, Ann M. Welhaf, Civ
Hamilton v. Statepublic domain
GOSHORN, Judge. Jessie Shawn Hamilton appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. Hamilton pled nolo contendere to this charge after reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. We reverse. At the hearing on Hamilton’s motion the State elected to rely on the arrest *1146affidavit in lieu of live testimony.
Kelly v. Hamiltonpublic domain
816 N.E.2d 1188 (2004) Chad KELLY and Shawn Tyree, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Terri HAMILTON, Appellee-Defendant, and Allstate Insurance Company, Appellee/Garnishee-Defendant. No. 85A05-0401-CV-53. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 4, 2004. *1189 Tom Belleperche, Blackburn & Green, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorney for Appellan
Suggs v. Hamiltonpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 92-3-00648-5, David R. Draper, J., entered April 5, 2001. Affirmed in part and reversed in part by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J., concurred in by Houghton and Armstrong, JJ.
Johnson v. Hamilton Medical Grouppublic domain
[1AMY, Judge. Defendant-appellee, Hamilton Medical Center, Inc. d/b/a Southwest Medical Center — Lafayette (hereinafter “SMC”), has filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal in Part,” in regards to the appeal filed by plaintiff-appellant, James Ronald Johnson (hereinafter “Johnson”). Johnson was awarded a judgment against SMC in the amount of “$62,127.25, together with legal interest from date of judicial demand until paid” and “$18,9
Johnson v. Hamilton Medical Grouppublic domain
AMY, Judge. hThe plaintiff filed suit, seeking damages for injuries he allegedly sustained after he fell while trying to alight from a wheelchair. The trial court awarded the plaintiff $50,000.00 in general damages and $18,975.32 in future loss of earning capacity. The plaintiff appeals the amount awarded for his future loss of earning capacity, the assessment of legal interest, the denial of past loss of earning capacity,
Hamilton v. Cannonpublic domain
Fletcher, Presiding Justice, dissenting. Although an argument can be made for limiting the public duty doctrine to police nonfeasance, no one on this Court has made it. Instead, in an answer that is shorter than the question raised, the majority decides that the public duty doctrine is limited to the “police protection context.” The opinion offers no explanation or support for its holding other than a citation
Hamilton Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Cannonpublic domain
CARNES, Circuit Judge: These appeals arise from the tragic death of Kim Orlena Hamilton at a Montezuma, Georgia municipal swimming pool. The three plaintiffs — Hamilton’s mother, Hamilton’s minor child, and the Administratrix of Hamilton’s estate — brought this action in federal district court alleging constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law negligence claims.
Commonwealth v. Hamilton, S.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 75 MM 2022 Respondent V. SHAWN JAMES HAMILTON, Petitioner ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 4t" day of November, 2022, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Hamilton v. Cannonpublic domain
PER CURIAM: This case arose from the tragic death of Kim Orlena Hamilton at a Montezuma, Georgia municipal swimming pool. The three plaintiffs — Hamilton’s mother, Hamilton’s minor child, and the Administratrix of Hamilton’s estate — brought this action in federal district court alleging constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law negligence claims. The complaint named as defendants Macon County, Georgia; the Ma
Hamilton v. Villinespublic domain
David Newbern, Justice. The appellant, Larry Hamilton, sought certification of a class consisting of Pulaski County taxpayers. His claim against the appellees, Pulaski County Judge Floyd G. “Buddy” Villines, III, and the members of the Pulaski County Quorum Court, is of an illegal exaction. We will refer to the appellees collectively as “Pulaski County.” The illegal exaction claim, brought under Ark. Cons
Phynelopha Johnson v. Shawn Myerspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1015 PHYNELOPHA A. JOHNSON, Administrator of the Estate of Phillip Osborne, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHAWN MYERS, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distri
Shawn Eagan v. Michael Dempseypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-3184 SHAWN EAGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL DEMPSEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the