⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Shawn Hamilton”

Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00129-COA BRYAN AVANTS APPELLANT v. SHAWN HAMILTON APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/24/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEBBRA K. HALFORD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: PIKE COUNTY CHANCERY COU
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2018-03-21 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-16-00186-CR __________________
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2023-09-08 · Published · cited 0× · 534 P.3d 1253; 2023 WY 89
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 89 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2023 September 8, 2023 SHAWN KENNETH HAMILTON, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-23-0068 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff).
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022-07-12 · Published · cited 14× · 39 F.4th 868
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1108 SHAWN SHANNON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
12/19/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 16, 2018 Session SHAWN T. SLAUGHTER V. GROVER T. MILLS ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 11-C-434 Jeff Hollingsworth, Judge ___________
Hamilton v. Millerpublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 2014-06-12 · Published · cited 19× · 23 N.Y.3d 592; 15 N.E.3d 1199
OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Lippman. We hold that, in these personal injury actions, it was an abuse of discretion to order plaintiffs to produce, prior to the defense *598medical examinations, medical reports detailing a diagnosis of each injury alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs and causally relating those injuries to plaintiffs’ expo
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012-06-15 · Published · cited 141× · 684 F.3d 548; 2012 WL 2161401; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12197
WIENER, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Shawn Daniel Serfass pleaded guilty to possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court applied a two-level sentencing enhancement under United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 201.1(b)(5) 1 based on the
Hamilton v. Holderpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009-10-27 · Published · cited 11× · 584 F.3d 1284; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23674; 2009 WL 3430121
584 F.3d 1284 (2009) Shawn James HAMILTON, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent. No. 09-9505. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. October 27, 2009. Submitted on the briefs:[*] Yalila Guerrero, Houston, TX, for Petitioner. Anh-Thu P. Mai-Windle, Senior Litigation Counsel, Ann M. Welhaf, Civ
Hamilton v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989-10-26 · Published · cited 0× · 552 So. 2d 1145; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2507; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5989; 1989 WL 125984
GOSHORN, Judge. Jessie Shawn Hamilton appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. Hamilton pled nolo contendere to this charge after reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. We reverse. At the hearing on Hamilton’s motion the State elected to rely on the arrest *1146affidavit in lieu of live testimony.
Kelly v. Hamiltonpublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004-11-04 · Published · cited 8× · 816 N.E.2d 1188; 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 2187; 2004 WL 2473838
816 N.E.2d 1188 (2004) Chad KELLY and Shawn Tyree, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Terri HAMILTON, Appellee-Defendant, and Allstate Insurance Company, Appellee/Garnishee-Defendant. No. 85A05-0401-CV-53. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 4, 2004. *1189 Tom Belleperche, Blackburn & Green, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorney for Appellan
Suggs v. Hamiltonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 116 Wash. App. 1016; 2003 Wash. App. LEXIS 1049
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 92-3-00648-5, David R. Draper, J., entered April 5, 2001. Affirmed in part and reversed in part by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J., concurred in by Houghton and Armstrong, JJ.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005-04-20 · Published · cited 3× · 900 So. 2d 341; 5 La.App. 3 Cir. 00204; 2005 La. App. LEXIS 1042; 2005 WL 901040
[1AMY, Judge. Defendant-appellee, Hamilton Medical Center, Inc. d/b/a Southwest Medical Center — Lafayette (hereinafter “SMC”), has filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal in Part,” in regards to the appeal filed by plaintiff-appellant, James Ronald Johnson (hereinafter “Johnson”). Johnson was awarded a judgment against SMC in the amount of “$62,127.25, together with legal interest from date of judicial demand until paid” and “$18,9
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006-02-01 · Published · cited 0× · 921 So. 2d 1183; 2006 La. App. LEXIS 158; 2006 WL 229883
AMY, Judge. hThe plaintiff filed suit, seeking damages for injuries he allegedly sustained after he fell while trying to alight from a wheelchair. The trial court awarded the plaintiff $50,000.00 in general damages and $18,975.32 in future loss of earning capacity. The plaintiff appeals the amount awarded for his future loss of earning capacity, the assessment of legal interest, the denial of past loss of earning capacity,
Hamilton v. Cannonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997-03-21 · Published · cited 19× · 482 S.E.2d 370; 267 Ga. 655; 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 970; 1997 Ga. LEXIS 102
Fletcher, Presiding Justice, dissenting. Although an argument can be made for limiting the public duty doctrine to police nonfeasance, no one on this Court has made it. Instead, in an answer that is shorter than the question raised, the majority decides that the public duty doctrine is limited to the “police protection context.” The opinion offers no explanation or support for its holding other than a citation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996-04-19 · Published · cited 3× · 80 F.3d 1525; 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2048; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8663; 1996 WL 156862
CARNES, Circuit Judge: These appeals arise from the tragic death of Kim Orlena Hamilton at a Montezuma, Georgia municipal swimming pool. The three plaintiffs — Hamilton’s mother, Hamilton’s minor child, and the Administratrix of Hamilton’s estate — brought this action in federal district court alleging constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law negligence claims.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 75 MM 2022 Respondent V. SHAWN JAMES HAMILTON, Petitioner ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 4t" day of November, 2022, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Hamilton v. Cannonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997-06-05 · Published · cited 0× · 114 F.3d 172
PER CURIAM: This case arose from the tragic death of Kim Orlena Hamilton at a Montezuma, Georgia municipal swimming pool. The three plaintiffs — Hamilton’s mother, Hamilton’s minor child, and the Administratrix of Hamilton’s estate — brought this action in federal district court alleging constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law negligence claims. The complaint named as defendants Macon County, Georgia; the Ma
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996-02-19 · Published · cited 2× · 323 Ark. 492; 915 S.W.2d 271; 1996 Ark. LEXIS 104
David Newbern, Justice. The appellant, Larry Hamilton, sought certification of a class consisting of Pulaski County taxpayers. His claim against the appellees, Pulaski County Judge Floyd G. “Buddy” Villines, III, and the members of the Pulaski County Quorum Court, is of an illegal exaction. We will refer to the appellees collectively as “Pulaski County.” The illegal exaction claim, brought under Ark. Cons
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022-11-16 · Published · cited 25× · 53 F.4th 1063
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1015 PHYNELOPHA A. JOHNSON, Administrator of the Estate of Phillip Osborne, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHAWN MYERS, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distri
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021-02-09 · Published · cited 569× · 987 F.3d 667
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-3184 SHAWN EAGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL DEMPSEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the