Cases

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. I would defer to the district judge’s exercise of discretion regarding the express threat of death enhancement. I do not see much of a distinction between this case and the quoted language in Application Note 2, U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3. The Applica*873tion Note says that where tw

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1610 NOEL ARISTIDES CANALES-RIVERA, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued: October 30, 2019 Decided: Jan

OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on motion to compel discovery filed by plaintiffs on October 25, 2010. (Docket No. 77.) A response in opposition to the motion to compel was filed by defendants on November 12, 2010. (Docket No. 78.) The motion to compel was originally denied on November 15, 2010. The attorneys were order to meet

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Roy Mata (“Mata”) appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) & (b)(l)(A)(vii); and possession of a

ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1591 HERNAN PORTILLO FLORES, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. ------------------------------ AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCI

Re Document No.: 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge Granting in Part and Denying In Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Leslie M. Cornish (“Cornish”), an employee at the Superior Court of th

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge. This case involves parties and events that have been before this and other courts many times. Previously, Wade Robertson sued William Cartinhour in this Court, but the jury found against Robertson and returned a verdict in Cartinhour’s favor for $3.5 million in compensatory damages and $3.5 m

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAMUEL SHANKS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-0311 (CKK) INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER (July 7, 2026)

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED MARCH SESSION , 1997 November 19, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9604-CC-00171 ) Appe llant, )

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE