Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sharp v. Powell”
Powell v. Evanspublic domain
FAIR, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Before this Court for review is the enforcement of an agreed judgment. It was clearly within the chancellor’s authority to consider the intent of the parties in entering into the agreed judgment and to fashion a way to carry out that intent. Reluctantly, however, we must reverse and remand for the chancery court to join Bel-issa Powell as a necessary party, after her mother, J
Powell v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurancepublic domain
252 P.3d 668 (2011) Mildred POWELL, Appellant, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. 55159. Supreme Court of Nevada. May 5, 2011. *670 Matthew L. Sharp, Reno, for Appellant. Koeller Nebeker Carlson & Haluck, LLP, and Megan K. Dorsey and Ian P. Gillan, Las Vegas, for Respondent. BEFORE CHERRY,
Powell v. Statepublic domain
881 So.2d 1180 (2004) William Paul POWELL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D04-1419. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. August 27, 2004. *1181 William Paul Powell, Jr., Century, pro se. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney G
Sharp v. Perduepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RASHARI N’ZINGA SHARP, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:19-cv-2393 (TNM) THOMAS J. VILSACK, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rashari Sharp claims, pro se, that
HUMANA HEALTH PLANS, INC. v. Powellpublic domain
603 F.Supp.2d 956 (2009) HUMANA HEALTH PLANS, INC., Plaintiff v. Patti POWELL, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:07CV-385-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. February 25, 2009. *957 John David Kolb, Linda H. Clare, Gibson & Sharp PSC, Louisville, KY, for Plaintiff. Joseph D. Satterley, Kenneth L.
State v. Sharppublic domain
On August 18, 1994, a Clinton County police officer filed an affidavit in the Clinton County Municipal Court requesting a warrant to search the home of defendant-appellant, Donald E. Sharp. The warrant was issued, and with it police officers entered appellant's home, seizing marijuana and other controlled substances, drug paraphernalia, several firearms and ammunition. On August 22, 1994, the grand jury charged appellant with a seven-count indictment.1<
State v. Sharppublic domain
[Cite as State v. Sharp, 2021-Ohio-273.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2020-08-089 : DECISION - vs -
Powell v. Statepublic domain
717 So.2d 1050 (1998) Thomas O. POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Victor BATEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nos. 97-1285, 97-1286. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. August 7, 1998. *1051 James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Anne Moorman Reeves, Assistant Public Defende
State v. Sharppublic domain
[Cite as State v. Sharp, 2020-Ohio-3497.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2019-10-181 : OPINION - vs -
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation (collectively “Sharp”) appeal the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, Sharp Corp. v. United States, 852 F.Supp. 1072 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1994), affirming an antidumping administrative review by the Commerce Department’s International Trade Administration (“
Menzies v. Powellpublic domain
Appellate Case: 19-4042 Document: 010110764297 Date Filed: 11/07/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 7, 2022
Honie v. Powellpublic domain
Appellate Case: 19-4158 Document: 010110804325 Date Filed: 01/26/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 26, 2023
Powell v. Statepublic domain
W. SHARP, Judge. We affirm defendant James Powell’s judgment and sentences for grand theft of an automobile,1 grand theft,2 possession of a firearm by a convicted felon,3 and two counts of grand theft of a firearm.4 Powell pled guilty to these charges pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement. In exchange, the stat
Powell v. Statepublic domain
THOMPSON, Justice. Richard J. Powell appeals the sentence imposed by the trial court for Powell’s conviction for the offense of burglary of a structure. The burglary offense also formed the basis for a violation of probation. The trial court sentenced Powell to five years in the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) with credit for time served for the violation of probation. For the burglary offense, Powell received a concurrent
Powell v. Cartretpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-347 No. COA20-406 Filed 20 July 2021 New Hanover County, No. 18CVS2952 LARRY POWELL AND ALL AMERICAN BAIL BONDING, LLC, A North Carolina Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs, v. MARK WAYNE CARTRET, Defendant. Appeal by the North Carolina Department of Insuran
Powell v. Cartretpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-347 No. COA20-406 Filed 20 July 2021 New Hanover County, No. 18CVS2952 LARRY POWELL AND ALL AMERICAN BAIL BONDING, LLC, A North Carolina Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs, v. MARK WAYNE CARTRET, Defendant. Appeal by the North Carolina Department of In
People v. Sharppublic domain
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court People v. Sharp, 2015 IL App (1st) 130438 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption KEYSHON SHARP, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. First District, Third Division Docket No. 1-13-0438 Filed January 21, 2015 Rehearing denied
Powell v. Powellpublic domain
COBB, Judge. This is an appeal by the wife, Margaret Alice Powell, from a final judgment regarding property rights, alimony, attorney fees and costs awarded by the trial court in conjunction with a dissolution of her fourteen-year marriage to Harry E. Powell. It is the contention of the appellant that the trial court erred in denying her claims for special equity and lump-sum alimony in regard to promissor
Powell v. Riverside Hospitality Inc.public domain
COBB, Judge. This is a premises liability case. Powell slipped and fell while descending a wet outdoor cement staircase. She sued the owners of the building on the theory that non-skid tape affixed to the surface of the steps had worn out. The trial court granted a defense motion for directed verdict, and Powell appeals. Powell’s argument is predicated upon the assumption, for which she cites no authority
People v. Powellpublic domain
I. FACTS A. Guilt Phase Evidence 1. Prosecution evidence Tammy Epperson was a recovering heroin addict who had recently completed a 12-step treatment program and held a responsible job. Epperson lived on her own at Ballington Plaza, an apartment complex that accepted referrals from substance abuse recovery and in