Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Sharon Wooden v. Andrea Wooden”
Blommer Chocolate Co. v. Nosira Sharon Ltd.public domain
776 F.Supp. 760 (1991) The BLOMMER CHOCOLATE COMPANY and Insurance Company of North America, Plaintiffs, v. NOSIRA SHARON LTD., Fednav Ltd., in personam, and M/V NOSIRA SHARON, her engines, boilers, tackle, etc., in rem, Defendants. No. 88 Civ. 7577 (BN). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 4, 1991. *761</
People v. Brevermanpublic domain
MOSK, J. I dissent. In this cause, as in many others, the analysis required of the reviewing court entails consideration of whether the trial court erred and, if so, whether its error was reversible. Because the majority do not resolve either question correctly, I cannot join in their opinion. I By information filed in the Superior Court of Los Angeles
People v. Neashampublic domain
Filed 10/8/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A134873 v. GLENN ANDREW NEASHAM, (Lake County Super. Ct. No. CR925185)
Ochall v. McNamerpublic domain
[Cite as Ochall v. McNamer, 2016-Ohio-8493.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Andrea Ochall et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellants/ : No. 15AP-772 Cross-Appellees, (C.P.C. No. 14CV-5498) v. : (REGULAR CALEN
People v. Ngpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHARLES CHITAT NG, Defendant and Appellant. S080276 Orange County Superior Court 94ZF0195 July 28, 2022 Justice Groban authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Je
People v. Johnsonpublic domain
Opinion CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J. A jury convicted defendant Billy Joe Johnson of the first degree murder of Scott Miller (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)),1 and found true the special circumstance allegations that the murder was committed by means of lying in wait (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(15)), and for the benefit of, or at the direction of, and in association with, a criminal street gang (§ 19
Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 661 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 662 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
United States v. Pedro Luis Christopher Tinocopublic domain
BIRCH, Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants Manuel Hernandez and Tito Daniel Estupinan appeal their convictions under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, 46 U.S.C. app. § 1901 et seq. (1994 & Supp. V 1999) (“MDLEA”). They were convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine while on board a vessel subject to the jurisdictio
People v. Gutirrezpublic domain
564 N.E.2d 850 (1990) 205 Ill. App.3d 231 151 Ill.Dec. 395 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victorio GUTIRREZ, properly known as Marco Alvarez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-86-1376. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. August 3, 1990. Rehearing Denied September 27,
Boss v. Rockland Electric Co.public domain
95 N.J. 33 (1983) 468 A.2d 1055 JEFFREY AND SHARON BOSS, THE WEINSTEINS, THE YOKOIS, THE SULLIVANS, THE KALLITS, THE QUESTERS, THE GUILIANOS, THE PEDRETTIS, THE RIPPES, THE BANKOFFS AND THE ALESSIOS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ROCKLAND ELECTRIC COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS CO., AND TENNESSEE GAS AND TRANSMISSION CO., DEFENDANTS. The Supreme Court of New Jerse
Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.public domain
609 F.Supp.2d 951 (2009) HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor U.K. Ltd., and Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland GmbH, Plaintiffs, v. RAMBUS INC., Defendant. No. C-00-20905 RMW. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. February 23, 2009. *954 Allen Ruby, Law Offices
Fulks v. United Statespublic domain
*541ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR RELIEF UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge. INTRODUCTION Chadrick Evans Fulks was sentenced to death by a South Carolina federal jury for the 2002 carjacking and kidnapping resulting in the death of Alice Donovan. After an unsuccessful appeal to the United States Court of App
Schaefer v. Tannianpublic domain
CONSENT JUDGMENT GADOLA, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties to the entry of a Consent Judgment finally and fully resolving all of the remaining claims in this action; and It appearing to the Court that this action, initially commenced some twenty-two years ago, involves claims of discrimination based upon gender in hi
State v. Edwardspublic domain
868 S.W.2d 682 (1993) STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Milburn L. EDWARDS, Appellant. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. March 25, 1993. Permission to Appeal Denied August 2, 1993. *685 Jeffrey A. DeVasher, Sr. Asst. Public Defender, Nashville (on appeal), Karl F. Dean, Metro Public Defender, and Laura C. Dykes
American Library Ass'n, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
201 F.Supp.2d 401 (2002) AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., v. UNITED STATES, et al. Multnomah County Public Library, et al., v. United States of America, et al. Nos. CIV.A. 01-1303, CIV.A. 01-1322. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 31, 2002. *402 *403 <
ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS