⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

17 opinions for “Sharon Raye Brown”

California Court of Appeal · 2000-04-10 · Published · cited 24× · 94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 535; 79 Cal. App. 4th 935; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2760; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3719; 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 267
94 Cal.Rptr.2d 535 (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 935 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL SCIENTISTS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME et al., Defendants and Respondents; Albert W. Mills et al., Interveners and Appellants. Albert W. Mills, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Department of Fish and Game et al., Defendants and Appellants, Nos. C023075, C023184.
California Court of Appeal · 2004-09-14 · Published · cited 13× · 18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 715; 122 Cal. App. 4th 284; 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8445; 2004 Daily Journal DAR 11480; 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1529
18 Cal.Rptr.3d 715 (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 284 C & C CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. C040761. Court of Appeal, Third District. September 14, 2004. Rehearing Denied October 13, 2004. Review Denied December 15, 2004. <
California Court of Appeal · 2014-07-31 · Published · cited 0× · 228 Cal. App. 4th 676; 175 Cal. Rptr. 3d 448; 2014 WL 3767076; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 694
Opinion RAYE, P. J, Substantial legal questions loom in the trial court as to whether the high-speed rail project the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) seeks to build is the project approved by the voters in 2008. Substantial financial and environmental questions remain to be answered by the Authority in the final funding plan the voters require
California Court of Appeal · 2008-10-21 · Published · cited 1× · 167 Cal. App. 4th 990; 84 Cal. Rptr. 3d 523
OPINION The El Dorado County Department of Child Support Services (County) filed a complaint for child support against incarcerated prisoner Jerry B. Nutt. The court found Nutt owed a duty of support, but found he presently has no income and so reserved jurisdiction on the amount of support. On appeal, Nutt asks us to find him "exempt" from all current and future support obligations. We decline and shall affirm the judgment.
Adoption of E.B.public domain
California Court of Appeal · 2022-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 2/15/22; Certified for Publication 3/16/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- Adoption of E.B., a Minor. C092765 M.B., (Super. Ct. No. 19AD0
California Court of Appeal · 2020-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/27/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- CITY OF CHULA VISTA et al., C080711 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2014-
California Court of Appeal · 2021-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 11/30/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- JOHN TOS et al., C089466 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2016-
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00711-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 6/18/2015 5:16:29 PM
California Court of Appeal · 2016-01-04 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 12/2/15 Certified for Publication 1/4/16 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- NORTH COAST RIVERS ALLIANCE et al., C072067 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2010-
California Supreme Court · 1989-05-04 · Published · cited 308× · 771 P.2d 1247; 48 Cal. 3d 805; 258 Cal. Rptr. 161; 1989 Cal. LEXIS 1292
48 Cal.3d 805 (1989) 771 P.2d 1247 258 Cal. Rptr. 161 CALFARM INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, as Governor, etc., et al., Respondents; ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION et al., Real Parties in Interest; AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURANCE et al., Interveners. Docket No. S007838. Supreme Court of California. M
People v. Wrightpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 1988-06-30 · Published · cited 243× · 755 P.2d 1049; 45 Cal. 3d 1126; 248 Cal. Rptr. 600; 1988 Cal. LEXIS 144
45 Cal.3d 1126 (1988) 755 P.2d 1049 248 Cal. Rptr. 600 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARL A WRIGHT, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. Crim. 24087. Supreme Court of California. June 30, 1988. *1131 COUNSEL Frank O. Bell, Jr., State Public Defender, under appointme
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001-04-18 · Published · cited 3× · 143 F. Supp. 2d 727; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5468; 2001 WL 432499
143 F.Supp.2d 727 (2001) Imelda T. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LAREDO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, and Paul Cruz, in His Official and Individual Capacities, Defendants. CIV.A. No. L-99-22. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Laredo Division. April 18, 2001. *728 David T. Lopez, David Lopez & Associ
California Court of Appeal · 2008-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 166 Cal. App. 4th 1121
166 Cal.App.4th 1121 (2008) ROBERT MARTINEZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. C054124. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. September 15, 2008. As modified October 7, 2008. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*]
People v. Neelypublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1999-03-09 · Published · cited 8× · 70 Cal. App. 4th 767; 82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 886; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1791; 99 Daily Journal DAR 2281; 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 197
Opinion MORRISON, J. J.After two earlier felony convictions and prison terms, defendant Charles Frederick Neely committed his first robbery murder in 1956. (.People v. Neely (1958) 163 Cal.App.2d 289 [329 P.2d 357].) After completion of his “life” sentence (his second) he was loosed upon the populace in 1975 and thereafter committed a home-invasion robbery murder on March 15, 1982. {Peopl
Nelson v. Statepublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 1964-12-30 · Published · cited 0× · 397 P.2d 700; 144 Mont. 439; 1964 Mont. LEXIS 148
397 P.2d 700 (1964) Wilburn A. NELSON, Petitioner v. The STATE of Montana, Respondent. No. 10896. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted December 10, 1964. Decided December 30, 1964. William Dee Morris, Butte (argued), for appellant. PER CURAM. Wilburn A. Nelson, an inmate of the Montana State Prison, through his counsel, William Dee Morr
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00478-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/18
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS