Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sharon Lynn Fleming”
SHARON LYNN FLEMING v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SHARON LYNN FLEMING, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case N
Fleming v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed.
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Stewart v. VCU Health System Authoritypublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ralph Stewart, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting the Virginia Commonwealth University Health System Authority’s petition for attorney’s fees and ordering that he pay attorney’s fees in the amount of $28,547.25 as a sanction for his failure to comply with th
Stewart v. VCU Health System Authoritypublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Ralph Stewart, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reconsideration and granting his request for an extension of time to file objections to the recommendation of the magistrate judge (No. 12-1190) and the court
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2016 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Mandella v. Penningtonpublic domain
73 So.3d 1257 (2011) Robert A. MANDELLA, Sr., and Sharon Mandella v. Eric PENNINGTON. 2100131. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. June 17, 2011. J. Farrest Taylor and Karol Fleming of Cochran, Cherry, Givens, Smith, Lane & Taylor, P.C., Dothan, for appellants. R. Mac Freeman, Jr., and J. Evans Bailey of Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett, P.A., Mont
Goble v. City of Smyrna, Georgiapublic domain
ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge Plaintiff William Alen Goble was a firefighter who, after disclosing he suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder *1353(“PTSD”), was terminated after more than twenty years of employment with the City of Smyrna Fire Department. Plaintiff argues that he was discriminated against based on his d
ENRIQUE MENENDEZ v. UNITED STATES.public domain
Reid, Senior Judge: A jury found appellant, Enrique Menendez, guilty of first-degree child sexual abuse; the jury also responded to two questions on the verdict form, finding that at the time of the offense, (a) the victim was under the age of twelve, and (b) the victim was under the age of eighteen and “[Mr.] Menendez had a significant relationship to [the victim] in that [Mr
McGowan v. Christiansenpublic domain
HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petitioner, through counsel Colleen P. Fitzharris of the Federal Defender Office, seeks habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which he challenges his convi
DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________
Winterhalder v. Burggraf Restoration, Inc.public domain
256 P.3d 84 (2011) 2011 OK CIV APP 38 Ed WINTERHALDER, Blue Collar Financial Group of Oklahoma, Meridian Capital, Donna Murphy, Sharon Feary, Bill Gregory, Gale Davis and Carolyn Davis, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BURGGRAF RESTORATION, INC., et al., Defendants/Appellees, Perry W. Newman, Third Party Defendant. No. 106,868. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma,
Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. Taftpublic domain
459 F.Supp.2d 626 (2006) PLANNED PARENTHOOD CINCINNATI REGION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Bob TAFT, et al., Defendants. No. C-1-04-493. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. September 27, 2006. *627 *628 Alphonse Adam Gerhardstein, Jennifer Lynn Branch, Gerhardstein Branch &am;
Commonwealth v. McGheepublic domain
Spina, J. In this case, we are asked to consider, for the first time, the constitutionality of the Massachusetts sex trafficking statute. On November 21, 2011, the Legislature approved “An Act relative to the commercial exploitation of people,” which criminalized sexual servitude, forced labor, and organ trafficking as of its e
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-14-00421-CV RONALD RALPH TREGELLAS AND WIFE, DONNITA TREGELLAS, APPELLANTS V. CARL M. ARCHER TRUST NO. THREE AND MARY FRANCES G. ARCHER TRUST NO. THREE, MARY ARCHE
Thomas v. Statepublic domain
Birdsong, Judge. Sharon Lynne Thomas was convicted of theft by taking (shoplifting) and sentenced to twelve months. She brings this appeal enumerating as the sole alleged error an insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of guilty. Held: The facts show and, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction (Watts v. State, 239 Ga. 725, 727 (1) (238 SE2d 894)), were suffici
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Repor
2020 IL App (1st) 191648 No. 1-19-1648 Opinion filed September 14, 2020 First Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINO
Tregellas v. Archerpublic domain
OPINION ON REHEARING James T. Campbell, Justice The motion for rehearing filed by appellants Ronald Ralph Tregellas and wife Donnita Tregellas (hereafter, “Tregellas”) is overruled in part and granted in part. The motion for rehearing filed by appel-lees Mary Archer Dixon and Carla Archer Johnson as trustees of the Carl M. Archer Trust No. Three and the Mary Frances G. Archer Trust No. Three1<